Cutting a cable may not constitute an act of war, but that doesn't mean the cable isn't a military target.

What are the implications of subsea fibers being considered military targets?

What @naval_service capabilities should we have to protect this critical data infrastructure?
Firstly, severing a subsea fiber isnt as simple as it sounds. Breaking a cable is one thing, severing it, is quite another.

Fiber optics are lightweight glass products, but propagating light across oceans requires power, so the cable is more a power cable as it is a fiber cable.
What's worth noting is that as the technology evolves, the form factor of subsea cables start to change.

More fiber cores are being pumped into small cables, means longer cables can be spooled onto cable laying ships.

But that presents a challenge

There is no one size fits all
If a critical legacy cable is broken, & spare cable isn't available on the shelf, a replacement length may need to be custom built to order.

Factor that in to aggressive manufacturing schedules, and you could be talking weeks, if not months to produce.
Then you need a ship that is capable, compatible, & available to collect the cable and deploy it.

These ships are in high demand with equally aggressive installation schedules to work against.
Repairing a cable doesnt always occur at the damage itself.

Diagnosing the fault can offer an indicative distance to the first break, but that is the dist of the cable, not the route.

The ship would bracket the fault over a multi km span, cut out & replace the bad section.
So when you see that 2.5 miles of cable has been removed from a circuit, that is an attack designed to strain the supply chain.

Ireland should take serious note of that and @IRLCoDF will hopefully be making recommendations to support maritime security.

thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4…
Why is all this important in the context of military targeting?

Because if the cable is deemed an acceptable military target. Then what about the cable laying ship? Or the manufacturer's factories? Or stores? Or the repair crews themselves?

Is the entire supply chain at risk?
Yes, a malicious nation state actor can sever a cable, and temporarily disrupt connectivity, but if they wanted to sustain that impact, they would have to attack the supply chain.

This is where we get into dodgy grounds with the laws of armed conflict.
Could a cable laying ship be considered a military contract vessel?

What if it is a French ship is attacked by a Russian submarine working on a Transatlantic cable landing in the UK, responding to a cable break in Ireland's EEZ?

What are the implications of that?
There has already been reports by @JohnMooneyIRL that Russian spies are conducting reconnaissance on Irish landing points. Suspicious trawlers linked to Russia have been detected in Irish EEZ. Russian submarines are tracked by Royal Navy through our EEZ too.

What are we doing?
If Ireland was cut offline. How long before that results in violence?

Imagine the misinformation campaigns over the mediums that are left accessible. It would be carnage.

The economy would be irreparably damaged, and I couldn't see the big tech attraction to an offline nation
How can the @defenceforces help?

1) Fund the Naval Service so that it is an attractive career
2) Build capability in anti-sub warfare, subsurface surveillance & multi-role vessels.
3) Engage network carriers & offer naval protection within 🇮🇪 EEZ to repair ships during conflict.
How can you help?

Spread the word.

Have a conversation about the impact of Ireland going offline with your colleagues. See where it goes

Advocate for more defence funding. (Defence isn't a dirty word).

Call on your TD to promote investment in the Naval Service.
Lastly, if Ireland does suddenly get cut off from the internet and go offline, don't tune into RT and have them convince you it was a @NATO plot to use trained sharks to bite through cables to reduce the information flow so that they can control the Irish population.

Just don't.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Gilbey

Robert Gilbey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RobGilbey

10 Jan
Is neutrality a hill worth a United Ireland dying on?

Hypothetically, if a #UnitedIreland was conditional on the State applying for @NATO membership, would it be worth surrendering the undefined policy of #neutrality?

@sinnfeinireland
@fiannafailparty
@FineGael
@labour
To get as broad a viewpoint as possible, any retweets of the poll would be appreciated.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Too many questions to answer in a single tweet, so I'll thread my reply.

Firstly, I will ask what is your interpretation of #neutrality?

I have to ask because Irish neutrality is subjective

It is not a written policy, nor is it recognised officially by any other nation or body
Actually, the latter point isn't strictly accurate, as @NATO acknowledges Ireland's "military neutrality" (note: they spelt out what it means to them).

Beyond that, there's no legally binding defined statement of Irish neutrality.

It does not exist.

nato.int/cps/en/natohq/…
"Military Neutrality" is meaningless, the term is a self-licking lollipop.

Unless the country is run by a Junta, the military doesn't have a say in where it gets deployed. As an instrument of political will, it is completely indifferent.

Politically, Ireland is far from neutral
Read 14 tweets
11 Mar 21
The last line is telling.

THREAD

The @IRLCoDF need to be seen to do something on #Cyber because @IRLDeptDefence offloaded general #CyberDefence responsibility onto @Dept_ECC & @ncsc_gov_ie.

But The National Cyber Security Strategy doesn't cater for defensive & offensive Ops.
So how can the @IRLCoDF build that capability into the @defenceforces as part of it's recommendations?

SPOILER:

It can't all sit with the Communication and Information Services (CIS) Corps.
1st, the @defenceforces needs an Intelligence Corps.

One that has career structures built to develop talent in the field of technical and military Int collection, collation, analysis & effective dissemination.

We need to be capable of making big data driven decisions fast.
Read 16 tweets
14 Feb 21
Irregular warfare has and continues to be a feature of modern conflict.

Should Ireland have an Irregular Reserve as part of an Irish Resistance Operating Concept?

It's not as dramatic as it sounds.

At <0.3% GDP spent on Defence, Ireland can't afford to build a mass of professional part time combat arm Reservists.

The current model of relying on individuals to be professional military standard volunteers has failed.

So if armed volunteers is the policy, how can it work?
Conscription or National Service in Ireland?

Given the discourse around EU Armies, I sincerely doubt that either be acceptable to the public without some existential driver behind it.

Conscription is typically viewed through a 20th century lens.
Read 13 tweets
17 Dec 20
Thread:

"With regard to the RDF, the Commission will consider a wide range of options and will make recommendations to better leverage the capabilities of the RDF in their supports to the PDF and to make service in the RDF a more attractive option."

Let's unpack that.....
Thankfully, the "Abolition of the Reserve" wasn't considered an option in the Terms of Reference as it was in the DoD's 2012 "Value for Money" Review of the RDF.

I would link the source, but the DoD have opted not to host it despite it informing the 2015 White Paper Policy.
The 2012 Steering Committee comprised of Civil & Military (but not a single Reservist) personnel saw no role for the Reserve as the "PDF could meet all day-to-day tasks".

8 years on, & DF capability is limited due to a crippling retention crisis as a result of DoD mismanagement.
Read 30 tweets
26 Nov 20
This is a significant step forward for @dfreserve

"The decision to join or stay in the Reserve should be informed by a more ambitious approach to its role" -@simoncoveney responding to @davidstantontd

Special thanks to @BerryCathal for his proposals for Defence Act amendments
@simoncoveney - "I will be encouraging [The Commission on Defence] to be ambitious & if necessary, quite radical to reflect the future defence & security challenges"

"I think we're in a good space here"

@BerryCathal "What the Minister has proposed has exceeded my expectations"
Solid foundations are being laid for what might well be a very progressive set of recommendations by the Commission on Defence.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(