1/n Let’s see in thread how people across ages have seen economic condition of India.
Let’s begin with François Bernier’s records in his work “Travels in the Mogul Empire.”
“There was no middle state. A man must be of the highest rank or live miserably.”
2/n Then he writes:
“Most towns in Hindustan are made up of earth, mud, and other wretched material; that there is no city or town (that) does not bear evident marks of approaching decay.”
3/n He goes on to add info of situation in Timurid (Moghul Empire):
“In eastern countries, the weak and the injured are without any refuge whatever; and the only law that decides all controversies is the cane and the caprice of a governor.”
4/n He laments about agriculture:
“The peasant cannot avoid asking himself this question: Why should I toil for a tyrant who may come tomorrow and lay his rapacious hands upon all I possess and value… without leaving me the means (even) to drag my own miserable existence?”
5/n François Bernier adds:
“The Timariots (Timurids), Governors and Revenue contractors, on their part reason in this manner: Why should the neglected state of this land create uneasiness in our minds, and why should we expend our own money and time to render it fruitful?
6/n We may be deprived of it in a single moment (...)Let us draw from the soil all the money we can, though the peasant should starve or abscond (...)”
7/n He then writes,
“The Timurids maintained a large army for the purpose of keeping people in subjection… No adequate idea can be conveyed of the sufferings of the people. The cudgel and the whip compel them to incessant labour (...)”
8/n He then talks about pathetic situation of Artisans:
“No artisan can be expected to give his mind to his calling in the midst of a people who are either wretchedly poor, or who, if rich, assume an appearance of poverty, and who regard not the beauty and excellence
9/n but the cheapness of an article; a people whose grandeess pay for a work of art considerably under its value and according to their own caprice (…) For it should not be inferred that the workman is held in esteem, or arrives at a stage of independence.
10/n Nothing but sheer necessity or blows from a cudgel keeps him employed; he never can become rich, and he feels it no trifling matter if he have the means of satisfying the cravings of hunger and of covering his body with the coarsest garment.
11/n If money be gained it does not in any measure go into his pocket, but only serves to increase the wealth of the merchant.”
12/n François Bernier goes on to write:
“(…)grandees pay for a work of art considerably under its value, and according to their own caprice. (…)When an Omrah or Mansabdar requires the services of an artisan, he sends to the bazar for him, employing force, if necessary,
13/n to make the poor man work;& after the task is finished,the unfeeling lord pays, not according to the value-of the labour,but agreeably to his own standard of fair remuneration;the artisan having reason to congratulate himself if the Korrah hasn’t been given in part payment.”
14/n Please note that above accounts of François Bernier who was a French physician and traveller. He visited India during the Timurid (Moghul) Empire from 1656 to 1668 AD.
I’ll add more informations in this thread in sometime.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“In India I found a race of mortals living upon the Earth, but not adhering to it. Inhabiting cities, but not being fixed to them, possessing everything but possessed by nothing.”
—Apollonius of Tyana
Will Durant says:
“India was the motherland of our race, & Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages: she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity;
mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all.”
He writes so in “The Case for India” published in 1931
"it symbolizes joining earth, space and swarg, thereby bringing connotation the "cosmic axis" by expressing the cosmic totality of the Vāsudeva, Supreme Deity. "
Source: Approaches to Iconology, Vol 4-6, Hans Gerhard Kippenberg
3/n The inscriptions of #Heliodorus stambha is very interesting written in Brahmi script (Sunga period), language being Central-western epigraphic Prakrit, with Sanskritized spellings (Richard Solomon).
It praises Vāsudeva, the God of Gods & has verse from Mahabharata.
1/n Words of hero of liberals, Voltaire on #Muhammad:
“ If the archangel Gabriel had brought the leaves of the Koran to Mahomet from some planet, all Arabia would have seen Gabriel come down: nobody saw him; therefore Mahomet was a brazen impostor who deceived imbeciles.”
Then he wrote a play titled “Mahomet”. He presented this to Pope Benedict XIV & wrote as below:
“(...) this performance ("Fanaticism, or Mahomet"), written in opposition to the founder of a false and barbarous sect.”
3/n Voltaire further writes:
“To whom could I with more propriety inscribe a satire on the cruelty and errors of a false prophet, than to the vicar and representative of a God of truth and mercy? (...)”
Source: Voltaire:François-Marie Arouet, Letter to Benedict XIV, 17/8/1745
AD (Anno Domini)=a Latin phrase meaning "in the year of the Lord", the full form of the abbreviation AD, which is used when referring to a year after Jesus Christ was born
3/n CE (Common Era)=the period from the birth of Jesus Christ, when the Christian calendar starts counting years as AD
SO basically it is the "year of Jesus or year of Christianity".
1/n When Umar-II tried to make Leo-III a momin, he spoke of fakery related to Quran.
Leo says:
“You say that it was written by God, & brought down from the heavens, as you pretend for your Furqan (Quran) although we know that it was 'Umar, Abfi Turab & Salman the Persian,...
2/n ...who composed that, even though the rumor has got round among you that God sent it down from the heavens.”
Source: GHEVOND'S TEXT OF THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN 'UMAR II AND LEO III
3/n He further says:
“None of the Prophets has announced to the world a fourthperiod,whether for doctrine or for the promises. On the contrary we are ofttimes warned by our Saviour not to admit any other Prophet nor any Apostle after the death of His
disciples.”