Tweet

More from @TheUfoJoe

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

14 Jan

@RepRubenGallego

1 #ufotwitter - @RepRubenGallego: "There is absolutely no difference (between "UFOs" & "UAP") but I think the logic behind it is to basically demystify it all, to destigmatize the conversation about these phenomena, whether they are #ufos. Then we can talk further about that.

https://twitter.com/Akam1129/status/1481620652444504067

2 Gallego: "But one of the biggest problems we are recognizing, I recognize, is that we have a lot of 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 pilots, people in the military, that are afraid of uttering the word, "#UFO." So by kind of desanitizing the language, I think this is an approach to get

3 Gallego: "more people to actually talk about what they're seeing."

Why is Congress Directing The Pentagon To Study #UFOs?

Gallego: "I would say, probably, a lot of credit has to go to Harry Reid who kind of started this movement a couple of years ago (AAWSAP began in 2008)

Read 26 tweets

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

14 Jan

https://twitter.com/fin365/status/1480676619857580034

1 That's a good one, too. This is from my Wilson/Davis megablog.

"[Will] Miller teased that he was 'working with investigative journalists,' which turned out 2 be Leslie Kean, whose work we’ll cover a little later. Something known to diehard students of #UFO-logy is Chapter 13

https://twitter.com/fin365/status/1480676619857580034

2 "of the FEMA publication, 'Fire Officer’s Guide 2 Disaster Control' by William M. Kramer. The infamous Chapter 13 explains how 2 deal with #UFO crashes or landings. Back then, I remember telling a Tampa firefighter friend of mine, Bill, about the chapter. He was very skeptical,

3 "until he went to work and read it for himself. Needless to say, he was a bit baffled as to why that was in there.

"At the time, the current edition was dated 1992. But Miller said Kramer asked him to 'head up' and assist in revising that particular chapter. 'Our collective

Read 5 tweets

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

12 Jan

1 #ufotwitter - Just to be clear, since a few folks put words in my mouth: I don’t have a problem with people making $ in this field. Of course, the ones who do the best are Secure Team Bullshit & 3rd Phase of Clickbait. Then u have others who do zero research or studying. But if

2 folks want to support that or support #UFO-tainment, that’s their business. I would just hope you seek out and support the researchers/content providers who would do this even if no money was involved. They’re easy to spot and many have a long track record.

@ericalukesuap

3 I vehemently disagree w/ @ericalukesuap on various things but one cannot argue she doesn’t know her history or hasn’t put in a ton of effort & research into this field. She clearly has.

@OmniTalkRadio has been @ it for decades, is an international treasure, & a great guy.♥️

Read 5 tweets

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

12 Jan

1 Nothing fancy. Just an article about NIDS investigating the infamous Missouri/Illinois #ufo sighting of January 2000. Found it while looking for something else.

"Two members of a Las Vegas #UFO research organization (NIDS) returned home Wednesday after spending five days

2 "investigating a reported Jan. 5 sighting of a UFO near the Missouri-Illinois border.

"The National Institute for Discovery Science sent John Velier, a former FBI agent, and Roger Pinson, a retired police officer, to the St. Louis area Friday, Colm Kelleher,

3 "deputy administrator for the institute, said.

"'Our philosophy is to use scientific methods to get facts. We are not trying to push an agenda,' Kelleher said.

"Velier and Pinson spoke with many of the people who reported seeing a two-story high, arrowhead-shaped object make

Read 4 tweets

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

11 Jan

@alejandrotrojas

1 #ufotwitter - Going over @alejandrotrojas (AR) 2019 interview transcript w/Dr. Eric Davis & making sure it's accurate. Plus, adding my own touches.

AR: "But there are these ideas out there right now that this is part of some controlled disclosure, that this has all been

2 AR: "planned. And if that was so, that would mean that u were part of some bigger plan. I mean, is that something that u feel is credible at all? Do u see that? Or is this just kind of the fruits of your efforts, all of your efforts to bring kind of the credibility to these

3 AR: "more...what would be considered fringe areas of science?"

Eric Davis (ED): "Well, it's two things. It's the cumulative effect of all of our efforts, decades of efforts of hard work, but the release of this information is driven strictly by the phenomenon itself. All of

Read 8 tweets

Joe Murgia

@TheUfoJoe

30 Dec 21

@SenatorReid

1 #ufotwitter - Excerpt of @SenatorReid's forward to, "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon."

"Regardless of when AAWSAP ended or when AATIP began, the facts are undeniable. Data on #UAPs exist; they need to be analyzed; more data needs to be collected; and the public should be informed

2 Reid: "as much as possible. The confusion over these 2 programs also underscores why the U.S. gov't needs to establish and fully fund a centralized & coordinated effort focusing on the scientific, technological, & national security implications of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

3 Reid: "From whatever hypothesis you begin with - UAPs being technological leaps from foreign adversaries, natural occurrences distorting visual perception, visitations from other dimensions, or technology from otherworldly sources - the key point is we need to engage

Read 11 tweets

Share this page!

Joe Murgia

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @TheUfoJoe

Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?