1 #ufotwitter - @RepRubenGallego: "There is absolutely no difference (between "UFOs" & "UAP") but I think the logic behind it is to basically demystify it all, to destigmatize the conversation about these phenomena, whether they are #ufos. Then we can talk further about that.
2 Gallego: "But one of the biggest problems we are recognizing, I recognize, is that we have a lot of 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 pilots, people in the military, that are afraid of uttering the word, "#UFO." So by kind of desanitizing the language, I think this is an approach to get
3 Gallego: "more people to actually talk about what they're seeing."

Why is Congress Directing The Pentagon To Study #UFOs?

Gallego: "I would say, probably, a lot of credit has to go to Harry Reid who kind of started this movement a couple of years ago (AAWSAP began in 2008)
4 Gallego: "by putting money to study #UAPs a couple of years ago. I think the other thing that really has happened is like there is a new, renewed sense of Congress that we need to know what's going on & us burying our head[s] in the sand is not going to help to find an approach
5 Gallego: "to this. I'm not the person saying, 'Oh, there's definitely some little green men in these UAPs out there.' What I'm saying is, 'If we 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 a problem, the problem is we have these unidentified objects. And if you have a problem like that, then you need to have a
6 Gallego: "solution to do that. And in order to have a solution, you need to have a study and treat this like a real, potential threat that it is. When I say 'potential threat,' it could be some really advanced Russian weaponry, some really advanced private weaponry. It could
7 Gallego: "be natural, things that are happening in nature that are affecting our radars. Or yes, it can be extraterrestrial, at the same time."

(Will @julianbarnes step in and try to tell us that by saying extraterrestrial, Gallego really meant meteors and/or solar flares? 🙄)
8 What is a UFO Rapid Response Team and How Would They Work?

Gallego: "OK, well it's not as cool as it sounds (laughs). But look, it's essentially a team that is to investigate occurrences of UAPs, right? And the most important thing for their job to do is to gather information
9 Gallego: "and gather information quickly. And what usually happens for a lot of these instances is that the information gets very stale, or people lose their nerve to talk, which is also bad, and then the information gets stale again. So, this organization, this
10 Gallego: "rapid response team would actually be there to collect information. And the information collection is really important because the next step is actually the 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 important...is the data that comes from it, right? The reason we don't have definitive answers -
11 Gallego: "besides that there's been, in my opinion, an obvious attempt by the government 𝘯𝘰𝘵 to look for the answers - [and] even when we do, we don't have any kind of real data. When is this occurring? How often does it occur? Where does it occur? What are the
12 Gallego: "similarities? And sometimes it's happening to @usairforce personnel & it's happening to @USNavy personnel. But maybe it happens to @USArmy personnel but they don't talk to anybody [except] to each other, right? So the idea of us having a department-wide office is for
13 Gallego: "us to be able to take in all this information so then we can turn around & analyze it. And once you have [a] good analytical basis to make decisions from, then you can actually move to next steps."

What Made You Push For More #UFO Research & Preparedness?
14 Gallego: "It's more of a national security...it is under my jurisdiction as the chairman of intelligence special operations. And the committee itself, the subcommittee - intelligence special operations - is new & it's part of my jurisdiction. So, of course, if it's part of my
15 Gallego: "jurisdiction, I'll investigate it. We knew that there was a report coming out from the @DeptofDefense, so I arranged a classified briefing of that report. And taking information from that report is what helped me create the amendment that you now find in the
16 Gallego: "defense budget that largely is also aligned with @gillibrandny.

What Does The Public Need To Know About UFOs and How Our Government Handles Them?

Gallego: "Well, I think the government is now moving in the right direction in dealing with #UAPs/#UFOs - or whatever
17 Gallego: "you prefer to call them - is that now that we're actually going to be looking at the data and actually looking, essentially, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 them. Not in the traditional sense that we're going to have people exploring, but we're actually going to be looking through past
18 Gallego: "instances, past witnesses, past encounters - whatever it is - and to be able to actually, again, form good data so that they can make some good decisions off that data. Whereas before, there really wasn't a concentrated effort
19 Gallego: "by the federal government to figure out what was going on. If anything, the goal was just to ignore and/or not talk about it, unless it was a direct, national security threat. When I mean it's a direct national threat, there was something that they weren't able to
20 Gallego: "identify but they thought was maybe Russian or Chinese or some type of threat. Then they would actually go look at it. Now we're actually going to take, basically, a real, across-the-board look at everything that we encounter."
21 Early in this interview Gallego praised Senator Reid & said, "there's been, in my opinion, an obvious attempt by the government 𝘯𝘰𝘵 to look for the answers - [and] even when we do, we don't have any kind of real data."

Well, I have no doubt that data exists but folks like
22 Gallego, Gillibrand, Rubio, etc. don't have access to it. THAT is the problem. Has the gov't avoided looking for the answers? Here's Senator Reid on S1 E6 of "Unidentified.

Reid: "You know why they’re not looking at it? They don’t want to. It’s another issue that they're
23 Reid: "trying to ignore. And that’s what’s happened over the years and that’s too bad. We now have the technology. What else is going on in space? That information is coming in. It’s all stored some place in a computer bank and it could be pulled up.”

ufojoe.net/unidentified-e…
24 I believe Reid was referring 2 satellite data Mellon has referenced. Put the right filter on historical recordings & voilà...UFOs. And it wouldn't shock me if Gallego watched "Unidentified" and, he and his staffers read, "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon."

amazon.com/gp/product/B09…
25 Gallego: "...we're actually going 2B looking thru past instances, past witnesses, past encounters."

Lots 2 choose from but one guy I'd interview would be Admiral Thomas R. Wilson & ask him about his experience in June '97. I'd have Dr. Eric Davis in the room. #crashretrievals
26 If you like what you see on my blog (ufojoe.net), YT (youtube.com/ufojoe1) & Twitter, and would like to support my effort to do this as much as possible...

Patreon = patreon.com/ufojoe

PayPal – ufojoe11@aol.com

Venmo - venmo.com/u/ufojoe

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheUfoJoe

14 Jan
1 That's a good one, too. This is from my Wilson/Davis megablog.

"[Will] Miller teased that he was 'working with investigative journalists,' which turned out 2 be Leslie Kean, whose work we’ll cover a little later. Something known to diehard students of #UFO-logy is Chapter 13
2 "of the FEMA publication, 'Fire Officer’s Guide 2 Disaster Control' by William M. Kramer. The infamous Chapter 13 explains how 2 deal with #UFO crashes or landings. Back then, I remember telling a Tampa firefighter friend of mine, Bill, about the chapter. He was very skeptical,
3 "until he went to work and read it for himself. Needless to say, he was a bit baffled as to why that was in there.

"At the time, the current edition was dated 1992. But Miller said Kramer asked him to 'head up' and assist in revising that particular chapter. 'Our collective
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
1/3 I think most folks on #ufotwitter will enjoy this. I know I did.

1974, Berkeley, Jacques Vallee, Robert Anton Wilson, Venus, contactees and intelligences making us think they’re ET, when they’re not.
2/3 I think most folks on #ufotwitter will enjoy this. I know I did.

1974, Berkeley, Jacques Vallee, Robert Anton Wilson, Venus, contactees and intelligences making us think they’re ET, when they’re not.
3/3 I think most folks on #ufotwitter will enjoy this. I know I did.

1974, Berkeley, Jacques Vallee, Robert Anton Wilson, Venus, contactees and intelligences making us think they’re ET, when they’re not.
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
1 #ufotwitter - Just to be clear, since a few folks put words in my mouth: I don’t have a problem with people making $ in this field. Of course, the ones who do the best are Secure Team Bullshit & 3rd Phase of Clickbait. Then u have others who do zero research or studying. But if
2 folks want to support that or support #UFO-tainment, that’s their business. I would just hope you seek out and support the researchers/content providers who would do this even if no money was involved. They’re easy to spot and many have a long track record.
3 I vehemently disagree w/ @ericalukesuap on various things but one cannot argue she doesn’t know her history or hasn’t put in a ton of effort & research into this field. She clearly has.

@OmniTalkRadio has been @ it for decades, is an international treasure, & a great guy.♥️
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
1 Nothing fancy. Just an article about NIDS investigating the infamous Missouri/Illinois #ufo sighting of January 2000. Found it while looking for something else.

"Two members of a Las Vegas #UFO research organization (NIDS) returned home Wednesday after spending five days
2 "investigating a reported Jan. 5 sighting of a UFO near the Missouri-Illinois border.

"The National Institute for Discovery Science sent John Velier, a former FBI agent, and Roger Pinson, a retired police officer, to the St. Louis area Friday, Colm Kelleher,
3 "deputy administrator for the institute, said.

"'Our philosophy is to use scientific methods to get facts. We are not trying to push an agenda,' Kelleher said.

"Velier and Pinson spoke with many of the people who reported seeing a two-story high, arrowhead-shaped object make
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
1 #ufotwitter - Going over @alejandrotrojas (AR) 2019 interview transcript w/Dr. Eric Davis & making sure it's accurate. Plus, adding my own touches.

AR: "But there are these ideas out there right now that this is part of some controlled disclosure, that this has all been
2 AR: "planned. And if that was so, that would mean that u were part of some bigger plan. I mean, is that something that u feel is credible at all? Do u see that? Or is this just kind of the fruits of your efforts, all of your efforts to bring kind of the credibility to these
3 AR: "more...what would be considered fringe areas of science?"

Eric Davis (ED): "Well, it's two things. It's the cumulative effect of all of our efforts, decades of efforts of hard work, but the release of this information is driven strictly by the phenomenon itself. All of
Read 8 tweets
30 Dec 21
1 #ufotwitter - Excerpt of @SenatorReid's forward to, "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon."

"Regardless of when AAWSAP ended or when AATIP began, the facts are undeniable. Data on #UAPs exist; they need to be analyzed; more data needs to be collected; and the public should be informed
2 Reid: "as much as possible. The confusion over these 2 programs also underscores why the U.S. gov't needs to establish and fully fund a centralized & coordinated effort focusing on the scientific, technological, & national security implications of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.
3 Reid: "From whatever hypothesis you begin with - UAPs being technological leaps from foreign adversaries, natural occurrences distorting visual perception, visitations from other dimensions, or technology from otherworldly sources - the key point is we need to engage
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(