1 #ufotwitter - Thanks to whoever posted this the other day, it's now all over Twitter. Is this what happened when Dr. James Lacatski saw the object at #Skinwalker? Was it "popping in" from a higher dimension?
2 Dr. James Lacatski (JL): "We went into the ranch manager’s home and sat down. Now, we were having a casual conversation. You know, I’m certainly noticing that there are twelve or more crosses and crucifixes on the wall, and I was thinking, 'Hmm, Jim, I wonder if I really should
3 JL: "'have come here.' But in any case, you know, we’re having a nice conversation and then Bob (Bigelow) and the ranch managers went into, I’d best call it a personal finance discussion, which I felt kind of awkward being there. And I kind of went into a daze, you know, just
4 JL: "glancing around the room, seeing what’s the lay of the land in the rooms. And then this object appears, floating in the kitchen. Quite distinct. I mean, I looked away from it and it maintained its position and allowed me, I guess, actively allowed me to come back and look
5 JL: "at it and examine it more closely. It was not a blurry vision, it was not a speck in my eye. It was there, it was about 18 inches tall, 18 inches wide, floating in the middle of the kitchen. And that kitchen is quite distinct. Its style is 1950s style so the colors of the
6 JL: "tiles are quite distinct.
Noory: "Did it look like it just appeared?"
JL: "It just appeared. It just appeared and it was very sharp. Now, let me give you an exact description. Take a piece of spaghetti about six inches long. I’m just
7 JL: "saying, you know, in practical terms, to form a model of it. Get it wet or boil it and let it drop and start bunching up on itself. But at the very end that you’re holding, allow it to droop downwards, and stick out. Now that was super clear, that portion of it. It was a
8 JL: "truncated, it was a solid light yellow and it was surrounded by a different shade of yellow cloud. So, you know, I’m looking at this taking notes of what it looked like and just a few minutes ago, I looked back at my original drawing of it because I wanted to catch the
9 JL: "impact. And, as someone, I guess, I noted to someone and they’ve repeated it (Bigelow repeated it to @g_knapp), it looked very much like the cover object of Tubular Bells, the album from back, I guess it was in the 80s. Except it wasn’t chrome, it was yellow, and it
10 JL: "was solid. Quite clear and then it got fuzzy as the droopy portion went into the cloud. And that was it. There was nothing that dramatic about it. And that’s when we went into a discussion of, you know, I made the comment, 'Well, is this your decorating style?' And Jean
11 JL: "said, 'Oh, yes, this is my decorating style. Strange, though, but, you know, before you showed up, a cross flew out of the bathroom, horizontally, into the wash basket, on top of the washing machine.' So I’m thinking, 'Oh, hmm.' Well that’s when we went back and
12 "we went right through where the object was, as we all went back and toured the rest of the house and had further discussions about what was going on there. So it’s not a complex story, but that’s it."
13 Was the phenomenon trying 2B seen so Lacatski would be so impressed, he would suggest to Senator Reid that they start AAWSAP to study #UFOs AND related phenomena? If so, why? Did "it" want more people to visit Skinwalker Ranch so "it" could spread elsewhere, like a virus?
14 If you want to read more and see what I'm talking about regarding the alleged spreading like a virus...
15 If you like what you see on my blog (ufojoe.net), YT (youtube.com/ufojoe1) & voluminous tweets, and would like to support my effort to do this as much as possible...
LE: Oct. 2017 & coming out of the shadows on that stage with TTSA: With his previous job, he was used to having enemies & being anonymous. He wasn't used to using his name.
2 LE: Lots of people came before us with these type of claims about UFOs, JFK, etc. so I don't take it personally that media didn't take it seriously until the NYT ran their article. This field has a lot of interesting characters so you need to figure out who is who.
3 LE: Pentagon full of good people but when there are pockets of people who are jaded & even corrupts. When I went public, people in my chain of command were pissed off. How come I wasn't briefed? Why were you briefing Sec. of Defense staff & WH liaison & not two-star equivalent
1 Great book. Art Bell partook in some big time #UFO-tainment (Ed Dames was his ratings king) but he was so good at what he did, you didn’t realize it. One of the best interviewers I’ve ever heard and always asked the questions you were thinking.
2 I communicated w/Art on FB & messenger & we talked about 2012 (I wanted him as my host for a 2012 TV show I never did. He was open 2 the idea), Trump (Art really liked him) & I brought up Dames & the dangers of, “I interview the guest & my audience decides if they’re credible.”
3 I wasn’t a fan of that bc Art would prop up & praise Dames in his intro. and make him sound more credible than he was. In reality, after training in NYC, Ingo recommended Dames NOT be a remote viewer bc his imagination got in the way. So Dames was just a monitor in the program
"When we can specially take up that subject, one of our leading ideas, or credulities, will be that near approach by another world to this world would be catastrophic: that
2 "navigable worlds would avoid proximity; that others that have survived have organized into protective remotenesses, or orbits which approximate to regularity, though by no means to the degree of popular supposition.
"But the persistence of the notion that we must be
3 interesting. Bugs and germs and things like that: they're interesting to us: some of them are too "interesting.
"Dangers of near approach - nevertheless our own ships that dare not venture close to a rocky shore can send rowboats ashore -
1 If 2019 West Coast events & other unexplained incursions from "drones" are actually #ufos, it makes many of us think (as Eric Davis said) the phenomenon dictates disclosure. Is it trying to force us into revealing their presence? If so, it could be a mixed bag of good/bad.
2 Are we facing some near-future calamity that will need us to get our act together quickly in order for us to deal with it? Bad. Are "they" trying 2 wake us up? Good. Are "they" trying to alert us that we're also dealing w/some other negative intelligence that's taking advantage
3 of us? Bad. All speculation. Whatever it is, if it's trying to get us to evolve in some way, that could be good. Or, it could be the Vallee control system that's kicking in. If it's "automated" or dictated by certain social conditions that we've reached, that could be bad.
1 #ufo Was referencing Lue's comments earlier today on this
Lue: "Not a single one of these have been shot down, not a single one of these have ever been recovered from the ocean, not a single one of them has had a mechanical issue, not a single one has been able 2B intercepted.
LE: "And by the way, we have helicopters on these ships and not a single one has been caught by one of our helicopters or aircraft. You know, okaaaay. But you really got to do a lot of mental gymnastics then, to prove to me that that is some sort of
3 LE: "drone technology. I’m not saying it’s impossible. What I’m simply saying is you’ve got to build a case then to prove that. Because at this point, that’s a greater feat than saying it’s a UAP. Really. Because at that point, it’s, “Okay, well, we’re really talking about
1 Decent VF article from 12/22/17 that many may have missed.
"For Times editors, the primary considerations that led to the A1 publication of 'Glowing Auras and Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program' were more earthly in nature. 'The reason this was a story was
2 "'because the Pentagon acknowledged it had spent $22 million of taxpayer money to investigate U.F.O.s from 2007 to 2012 - & because Harry Reid had pushed for the funding, and was proud of it, on the record,' Washington Bureau Chief Elisabeth Bumiller, who oversaw the reporting,
3 "told me. 'We talked about it the way we talk about all stories - it had to be airtight.' Bumiller also noted that 'the story did not have a huge presence on A1 in print—it had only a small run on the front. On the Web, it had great play, in part because the video was so