1/🧵As we are entering phase 2⃣ of the stand-up with Russia over the future of European security, it's worth to sum-up phase 1⃣, in which Russian and Western positions have been clarified in a series of meeting in Geneva/🇺🇸🇷🇺, Brussels/NATO-Russia Council, Vienna/OSCE, Brest/🇪🇺
2/The starting point was 🇷🇺military build-up at 🇺🇦 borders in autumn & formulation of 🇷🇺demands for “security guarantees” from US/NATO on stopping NATO’s enlargement, withdrawing allied forces from the eastern flank, halting military cooperation with🇺🇦a.o.
osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/…
3/The West agreed to talk to 🇷🇺, but first allies&partners engaged in a wide consultation process among themselves, i.e. 🇺🇸-NATO-🇪🇺-partner nations of both orgs. This was important as some voiced concerns about 🇺🇸🇷🇺 deals on European security “above the heads of Europeans”.
4/As a consequence a double-track approach of the West towards 🇷🇺 was developed. It includes: 1⃣sticking to rules on which European security is based (sovereign rights of states to freely choose the course of their foreign and security policies, right to self/collective defence).
5/2⃣ being open to a limited dialogue with Russia in 🇺🇸🇷🇺 talks, within NATO-Russia Council and in the OSCE. At the same time the US, NATO and the EU repeat their warnings about serious consequences and high costs in case of further Russian aggression on Ukraine.
6/This double-track approach is an outcome of differing Western perceptions of 🇷🇺, political-social and economic contexts and traditions of developing Russia and security policies. The Western stance is a compromise which tries to reconcile allied positions.
7/The West doesn't want a military confrontation, diplomacy is the preferred way BUT without fulfilling 🇷🇺demands that equal compromising core principles on which European security&international order are built. Therefore:“no-go” issues + offer of a limited dialogue
8/In Geneva 🇺🇸 declared that it will not discuss with 🇷🇺 guarantees for: halting NATO enlargement, stopping military cooperation with 🇺🇦, withdrawing US forces from the eastern flank or issues directly concerning allies or Ukraine without their involvement.
9/🇺🇸 declared that they are ready to talk about the future of certain missile systems in Europe (context is the now defunct INF Treaty), reciprocal limits on the size and scope of military exercises, and improving their transparency.
10/In Brussels NATO confirmed that the open door policy will be continued as well as NATO's efforts to be able to defend all allies, i.e. the enhanced Forward Presence on the eastern flank a.o. will be maintained.
11/At the same time NATO is open for dialogue with 🇷🇺 on transparency of military exercises, prevention of dangerous military incidents, space&cyber threats reduction, or arms control, disarmament & non-proliferation.
12/NATO wants Russia also to re-open its permanent mission to NATO (🇷🇺 decided to close it in October 2021) & NATO’s military liaison mission as well as information office in Moscow (🇷🇺 withdrew their accreditation in October 2021).
13/The West wishes to revive a dialogue on European security also in the OSCE. The positions of 🇪🇺🇺🇸 were closely aligned: there is a will for dialogue combined with red lines – discussions need to be based on non-negotiable principles on which European security is based.
14/What about the EU? Before US/NATO-Russia talks some demanded to include 🇪🇺 into the meetings. After wide consultations between 🇺🇸-NATO-🇪🇺 the European Commission & @JosepBorrellF felt to be included into forging common position & underlined unified Western stance.
15/What is 🇷🇺 answer? Mixed signals with regard to the dialogue linked with threats of military consequences if all of Russian demands are not accepted, Russian military build-up around Ukraine, infos about possible Russian provocations.
16/What is 🇷🇺 strategy? Intensified military pressure on 🇺🇦 & the West, cyber attacks, use of energy deliveries, disinformation campaigns. All to diffuse the Western stance, divide the allies, deepen internal divisions in key countries - 🇺🇸&🇩🇪 to obtain far-reaching concessions.
17/What should be the strategy of the West? Sticking to the 🇺🇸NATO🇪🇺line, withstanding 🇷🇺pressure without entering rotten compromises that will provoke further demands, imposing sanctions in case of an aggression, strengthening defences of the eastern flank in such a scenario.
18/In Europe all eyes are on Germany, that sends confusing signals. If Berlin enters into any side deals with Russia, it will only embolden the aggressor. A worthwhile read👉“Russia policy of the German government needs a substantial correction”
zeit.de/zustimmung?url…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justyna Gotkowska

Justyna Gotkowska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jgotkowska

Jan 14,
1/ Długi 🧵: Gdzie jesteśmy w kwestiach europejskiego bezpieczeństwa po intensywnym tygodniu spotkań: USA-Rosja w Genewie (10.01), Rady NATO-Rosja w Brukseli (12.01), OBWE w Wiedniu (13.01), ministrów spraw zagranicznych i obrony we francuskim Brest (13.01)?
2/Przypomnijmy punkt wyjścia: rosyjskie żądania z 17 grudnia dotyczące m. in.: nierozszerzania Sojuszu, wycofania sił NATO z wschodniej flanki, zaprzestania współpracy wojskowej z Ukrainą i innymi państwami poradzieckimi.
Więcej @MarekMenkiszak 👉osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/…
3/Serię spotkań z Rosją poprzedziły szerokie konsultacje i koordynacja stanowisk (USA-NATO-UE + państwa partnerskie obu organizacji). Związane to było z wyrażanymi w Europie (przez niektórych) obawami o 🇺🇸🇷🇺 deal dot. bezpieczeństwa europejskiego "ponad głowami Europejczyków".
Read 22 tweets
Oct 28, 2021
1/ 🧵Eine Perspektive aus der Ostflanke - im Hinblick auf 🚦Koalitionsverhandlungen im Bereich der Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik
🔴@HeikoMaas @SiemtjeMdB @NilsSchmid 🟢@nouripour @agnieszka_mdb @bueti @tobiaslindner 🟡 @Lambsdorff @michael_g_link @MAStrackZi @DjirSarai
2/ Das sicherheitspolitische Umfeld verändert sich rapid:
👉Russland bleibt eine Bedrohung mit Aufrüstung seiner Streitkräfte & Entwicklung neuer Waffensysteme
👉China wird zum Herausforderer des liberalen internationalen Systems
👉Der Westen ist im Wandel
osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/…
3/ Die Verunsicherung an der Nord- und Ostflanke wächst. In Polen werden öffentlich heftige Diskussionen geführt, die die jetzigen sicherheitspolitischen Arrangements kritisch hinterfragen:
Kann man sich auf die NATO, USA, die westlichen Verbündeten in der Zukunft verlassen?
Read 11 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
1) 🧵 Discussions on ‘European defence’ have intensified in the recent weeks with the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and the AUKUS deal.

As I have recently written an article on European security and defence policy, here’s a thread on where we are:
osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/…
2) A few more issues have an impact:
👉the work on the Strategic Compass, the EU’s security and defence strategy
👉the French presidential election in April 2022 & France's presidency in the EU in the 1st half of 2022
👉the outcome of German elections?
3) France has ever wanted an ambitious EU’s security&defence policy – in terms of arms industry support, EU operations in southern neighbourhood, capability development in the EU.
+ It is Macron's topic, and the French defeat due to AUKUS is looming large before the election in F
Read 21 tweets
May 11, 2021
WĄTEK
1. Warto zapoznać się z przyjętymi wczoraj konkluzjami Rady UE w obszarze bezpieczeństwa i obrony, ponieważ podsumowują toczące się procesy i pokazują dalszą drogę. Tu kilka kwestii ważnych z mojej perspektywy.
2. Co chce robić UE w bezpeczeństwie?
W konkluzjach nie ma wzmianki o „European strategic autonomy” jest „increasing the EU’s capacity to act autonomously”, a to spora różnica.
👉Dyskusja o European strategic autonomy przeniosła się w międzyczasie na inne obszary działalności UE.
3. Wyszczególnione w konkluzjach cele UE:
- enhancing its ability to act as a global security provider through CSDP missions
- deepening security&defence cooperation amongst member states
- increasing defence investment
- enhancing civilian and military capability development
Read 16 tweets
May 10, 2021
"Steadfast Defender 2021 will be the first large-scale test of NATO’s adapted Command Structure, with the involvement of two new NATO commands – Joint Support and Enabling Command based in Ulm, Germany and Joint Force Command Norfolk, based in the US."
nato.int/cps/en/natohq/…
(1) The first phase of Steadfast Defender 2021 focuses on the rapid reinforcement of NATO’s European Allies by North American forces. This phase is led by JFC Norfolk and will include a maritime live exercise with around 5,000 forces and 18 ships.
(2) A table-top part of the exercise will take part in Ulm. This will train and test the ability of NATO’s new Joint Support and Enabling Command to coordinate the speedy movement of Allied forces and equipment across European borders. Some 300 personnel will be involved.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 21, 2020
1/ Informacje z marca się potwierdzają i tak wyglądają plany niemieckiego MON co do zastępstwa samolotów Tornado osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/…
2/ Przy czym tak jak pisałam „pojawia się pytanie, czy umowa na pozyskanie amerykańskich samolotów zostanie sfinalizowana w tej kadencji Bundestagu – i czy posłowie SPD w parlamentarnej komisji budżetowej poprą finansowanie tego programu – czy też jej podpisanie zostanie odłożone
3/ Plany niemieckiego ministerstwa dotyczące zastąpienia samolotów Tornado to wypadkowa sprzecznych interesów politycznych i przemysłowych.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(