This Q reiterates the point. They beat estimates in the most competitive market, and they announced price increases, so idea that competition is the problem doesnt hold IMO.

The longstanding question remains, what level of subs can be gained in APAC/LATAM at what price point.
Per a thread last week, Nathanson raising the issue that perhaps an ad supported mobile only tier is going to be necessary in EMs in order to get the type of penetration they expect.
Nathanson been for years "is streaming a good business". Like me asking is ecommerce a good business. In general, no! Streaming and ecomm for the median co are shittier businesses than linear tv/B&M retail. The winners are very valuable, because scale trumps inferior economics.
The bad news is, if NFLX isn't as good a business as we thought (and I still think it's the global winner with best long term economics), then the other players late to the party and doing so for existential reasons are in even bigger trouble.
which goes back to my thoughts on Disney and D+ forced into being a standalone value driver versus binding agent for the various divisions

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with modest proposal

modest proposal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @modestproposal1

Jan 20
“The final feature of the great superbubbles has been a sustained narrowing of the market and unique underperformance of speculative stocks, many of which fall as the blue chip market rises. This occurred in 1929, in 2000, and it is occurring now.“
No points for guessing who wrote it gmo.com/americas/resea…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 12
Great note from @darioperkins on challenges of analyzing post covid economy:

"Much of the confusion about the current state of the economy has its origin in people trying to
apply classic business-cycle analysis to COVID-19 macro distortions... But this is not a business cycle"
"Faulty business-cycle analysis has unduly influenced inflation debate, rapid price gains assumed to be a sign of “overheating”. Yet GDP in most of the world is ~ where it was expected to be in the absence of pandemic... two years ago, the main debate was about a liquidity trap"
"In short, investors must be careful not to infer “new secular growth trends” from what might merely be “levels” effects associated with (and largely confined to) the pandemic."
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10
Big Russ Hanneman Energy in the TURO S-1
need a name for unicorns with positive operating income
They are very clear in the document that Covid has helped them with rising awareness from both hosts and guests, and that the rental car shortage elevated pricing in the marketplace. Will be interesting to see how they message longer term margins.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 10
this thread makes it pretty clear that housing supply situation has not improved, and thus estimates for HPA for 2022 are likely too low. given the gains of last few years, have to start to think about ramifications given another year of likely double digit HPA. so let's look.
Bill at @calculatedrisk has his detailed look at home prices and affordability. On this index, things are still moderately affordable but getting less so by the day.

calculatedrisk.substack.com/p/real-house-p…
On the demand side, Evercore calcs underproduction through 2025, and that's after the sever underproduction of the last decade
Read 9 tweets
Jan 10
Very few CEOs talk the talk on capital allocation like Strauss Zelnick. Preaches opportunistic buybacks only when the stock is at "deep value". Selective M&A that they have not yet messed up. Very consistent messaging. Interesting to go back through the past few years comments.
"We bought back $360 million of stock at an average price of 97. At least today that looks like a smart move. We only do buybacks, when we believe we're executing them at deep value. That is just our opinion, but it is based on our view of the future"
"we opportunistically repurchased 1.26 million shares of our stock during the second quarter for $200 million with an average price of $158.67. This marks the first time in over two years that we repurchased our stock underscoring the deep value that we observed"
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2021
Covid was clearly bad for DIS Parks/Studio biz. But I've been thinking lately it was also bad for D+.

As @ballmatthew wrote, D+ was going to be a binding agent between the company and consumers, helping to drive the non streaming biz by establishing a direct relationship. Image
The reality of the pandemic is that D+/streaming role as a business unto itself was forced on the Company. Rather than being allowed to grow steadily and become integrated across the divisions, D+ became the focal point. Yes, the DTC biz is much larger today, but at what cost?
To date, we haven't seen the types of cross asset collaborations I would've hoped for. Obviously the pandemic has a lot to do with that! But management also dramatically upped the sub targets and investor focus is now squarely on the size and shape of DTC, not its halo effect.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(