The likelihood of a Russian gas cutoff to Europe seems low, but would be catastrophic if it happened. Europe would have to import much more LNG at exorbitant prices, industries would shut down due to unaffordable energy bills, and the European economy would take a massive hit.
Options for Europe to import more gas are limited, w other pipeline suppliers close to capacity. There is not enough LNG to accommodate the loss of Russian gas supplies into Europe, & Europe would need to pay price needed to pull all the flexible supplies it could away from Asia
To the extent you can substitute other fuels (eg coal, oil) for gas, much of that is already being done. Europe would likely face growing calls internally to ramp up its own gas production (e.g., Groningen), and to reverse or cancel planned nuclear closures.
Energy prices have already shown they react sharply to even small changes in balances. If prices soared to $60/mmbtu (compared to $4 in US) on a cold day when Russian deliveries were a bit weak, can you imagine where they’d be if we lose all Russian gas exports? $100+/mmbtu.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here are 10 major energy & climate trends I’m watching in 2022. A quick thread: 🧵
1) BBB: make or break
If BBB climate provisions become law, US has a shot of meeting its 2030 goals. Without them, it’s very hard.
With the right policy, green industrial policy can reduce GHG at home, spur economy & cement US leadership globally. foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/15/bid…
2) Volatile energy prices
Risk ahead: Oil price spikes. Mismatched energy supply investment & demand will prompt market crunch. With SPR already used once & dwindling OPEC spare capacity, fewer antidotes exist. Energy crises this winter were not one off. foreignpolicy.com/2021/09/24/ene…
A decade after Fukushima, nuclear power is getting a fresh look for 3 reasons: the urgency of meeting ambitious climate goals, significant advances in nuclear technology, and national security concerns.
I have a deep dive essay in @ForeignPolicy. See this thread for highlights🧵
First, as the urgency to combat the climate crisis grows, there is growing recognition that the pathway to net-zero emissions will be faster, easier, and cheaper if nuclear energy is part of the mix of solutions.
@Grimezsz got it right re: Diablo Canyon in California: “This is crisis mode, and we should be using all the tools that we have.”
At the end of a busy day, a few thoughts on today’s SPR release: 🧵 #OOTT
Effectiveness should be measured not by price response today but what it would have been absent the “verbal intervention” of the past few weeks. Expectations of a release contributed (tho not entirely responsible) to drop of $8/b since Oct & helped stem price run up.
It’s notable because it is not an emergency response to a severe supply disruption, as required for a major sale, but (as an exchange) an effort to tame higher oil price expectations amidst deep concerns about inflation.
Just back from @MunSecConf, where @ColumbiaUEnergy organized a side event on energy’s use as a geopolitical weapon, and I moderated a breakfast discussion on #NordStream2. Here are a few reflections from this year’s #MSC2019 & intersection with energy/climate. (Thread)
At a broad level, the dominant theme was concern among participants about the perception that America was retreating from the global stage and its leadership role in the rules-based international order.
It was notable that the US sent its largest contingent ever of members of Congress from both sides of the aisle, perceived by many as an effort to send a signal that the USG is comprised of more than just the White House.
THREAD: We wrapped @Davos#WEF19 today & I want to share my thoughts on the mood this year. Discussions focused on geopolitical & economic risks to the energy sector, #climatechange, optimism abt the pace & promise of technological innovation & outlook for clean energy.
Compared to 2018, the economic mood @Davos was more grim & subdued. Ongoing US-China trade dispute weighed heavily.. Many expect some resolution before March 2 deadline, but thorny issues in relationship will persist & China digging in for long-term. Brexit added to worries.
Last year’s lamenting by world leaders that the U.S. had withdrawn from the Paris climate agreement were replaced w/ deep concern that the U.S. has exited the world stage completely.
A few thoughts on the energy and climate mood in #Davos2018 this year as my train rolls away through the gorgeous Swiss countryside. Three big themes around climate, energy markets, technology.
The most striking thing about the mood in Davos this year is the tremendous optimism business leaders have about the global economic outlook. That's bullish for energy demand and prices (not great for GHG emissions btw)
Many of the most prominent world leaders noted the threat of climate change as among the top challenges the world faces today. Modi placed it first, along with terrorism & globalization backlash. Macron pledged to shut down coal plants by 2021.