1. Mathams and Adheenams operate differently in Tamil Nadu. So to pontificate to the @KanchiMatham is to target this great institution and to reinforce Dravidianist anti-Brahmin vitriol.
2. The entire point of the opposition to the Dravidianist ideology is its targeting of Brahmins and misrepresentation of Mathams. Birth-based selection and training happens across the board in Mathams and Adheenams.
3. So if you don't have the guts to talk about non-Brahmin institutions, first grow a spine and find your voice to speak up even with respect to such institutions.
4. When Brahmins of Tamil Nadu are already staring at d next wave of virulent anti-Brahmin vitriol, act with a sense of responsibility instead of pushing RW Wokeism in the name of social justice. As I said, wokeism is colonial and equally afflicts the Left and the so-called RW.
5. I stand by @KanchiMatham & its practice. Those who have a problem with my position & find it Brahminical and/or castiest can take a hike.I do not for a moment identify with those who hold forth on such issues & wear their ignorance as a badge of honour with added sanctimony.
6. I don't believe in holding an opinion for the sake of public validation nor do I need the badge of a social justice warrior. I stand by traditional institutions of all groups within the Hindu fold, including Mathams, and their right to preserve their respective identities.
7. Feel free to unfollow, block or boycott me. Continue attacking me. Even if I am alone in holding my views, I don't mind and I will not change my position. My allegiance is to Dharma as practiced by the Matham/Sampradaya I subscribe to. Not to the Twitter crowd or a party.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. So the farm laws have been repealed and predictably, the reactions to it have become the test of fidelity/loyalty/fealty to the dispensation. Even legitimate expressions of disappointment lead to the same done to the death question- so will you vote for the opposition?!
2.If d constituents of a dispensation do not express their disappointment,who will?Not every expression of disappointment is a litmus test of ideological allegiance. In any case,apart frm ideological leanings,d reality of this country today is d absence of a credible alternative.
3. Precisely becoz there is no credible alternative to the current dispensation at the Centre,the constituents themselves have a duty to criticise where criticism is warranted, just as credit has been given where it is due. After all, what is the value of a shill's opinion?
1. Ever since the release of my book #IndiaThatisBharat and its positive reception,a few handles have increased their direct & sly attacks on me, which I think is a back-handed compliment. Their latest tirade rides on the back of my tweets from 2015 on the subject of caste.
2.Apparently I am supposed to b embarrassed that my views on caste have evolved.That my views evolved significantly after I took up d Sabarimala case is something I have myself stated at least on 2 occasions,once in a discussion wid @UnSubtleDesi & again in my recent CH session.
3. Here's d link to my discussion wid @UnSubtleDesi & @pratyasharath held last year during d lockdown where d specific subject was the tug of war between the so-called "trads" & "Raytas". To the trawlers,at 15.33,I specifically discuss my tweets of 2015 -
Took part in a Twitter spaces discussion on State Control of Temples a short while ago.Every time someone from d Left participates in a discussion on this topic,I am absolutely amazed at their factual ignorance & their desperate attempts to couch it in vague inanities. Terrible.
All they resort to are the same old done to death tropes about caste and demonising community stakeholdership without an iota of knowledge of the legal framework as it stands or the Constitutional position or the visible degradation of the Temple ecosystem under State control.
When confronted with facts, "Arre what's the point of discussing minutiae!", chalo let's discuss the legal framework "Arre too technical!", OK how about the Constitution "arre this issue goes beyond the Constitution!". Lol. Had it not been a serious issue this was funny as hell.
When the plight of Bengali Hindus doesn't get a fraction of the traction in Bharat than that of Afghan Muslims, well, you know where you stand as a community. Nowhere.
Here's a fact for those asking us to not look at d situation in Afghanistan thru a communal lens- Existing Afghan refugees in Bharat did not speak up (& still haven't spoken up) for d plight of Hindu & Sikh Afghans until their brethren from the Ummah were targeted by the Taliban.
Clearly,notwithstanding d vague platitudes about universal brotherhood,wen d chips r down ur community is ur first & foremost safety net. It's time Dharmic communities understood & drilled this deep in their heads.Learn frm d experience of Pak,Afghan/Bangladeshi Hindus & Sikhs.
Bharat is not a Dharamshala.The priority must be to save Indic communities. It has to & must look out for itself first. It can't endanger its already precarious demographic balance to please the gallery & win empty humanitarian accolades. It can provide material aid & that's all.
Here's is an interesting exchange from Shri Chandraprakash Dwivedi's Chanakya on accommodating refugees citing "athithi devo bhava" because the problem is they won't be merely athithis for long -
Americans & Pakistanis have created this mess in Afghanistan. It is for them to clean it up,not Bharat.Demographic inversion is already a reality in several parts of Bharat & the Indian State shudnt worsen this situation. Only Indic communities are an exception to this position.