1/13 Okay then, I just became $SHOP shareholder. Tbh I don't think it's quite dirt cheap. It seems more "fair" to me (~HSD IRR potential) now than I ever did. So why buy something "fair" when perhaps a fire sale is going in some stocks?
2/13 SHOP makes a ton of sense for me in the portfolio context. I already own $FB, $GOOG, and $AMZN.
FB and GOOG are the super-aggregators. SHOP merchants pay tax to FB and GOOG to generate sales.
AMZN is THE marketplace. Love it or hate it, most 3P sellers gotta be there.
3/13 E-commerce is likely to continue to supersede overall retail sales growth for another 10-15 years. So e-commerce remains a very much secular growth theme.
4/13 SHOP, the one that's counter-positioned to AMZN, is the operating system for e-commerce in North America (and increasingly to the world).
Over time, I expect a sizable profit pool in e-commerce to be shared among these four companies: FB, GOOG, AMZN, and SHOP.
5/13 Post- Covid and SFN related frenzy, investors started embedding high expectations in SHOP's stock price. I was skeptical of SHOP's chances to build the kind of SFN that can be a potent competitor to the incumbents.
6/13 Now that enough doubts have been cast on SFN, along with the whiplash on growth land, SHOP has come back to a more palatable level to my taste.
7/13 With FB, GOOG, AMZN, and SHOP, I now have exposure to end-to-end in North America retail which was more important to *me*; that's why SHOP makes ton of sense from *my* portfolio context than individual stock picking bet.
I know, I know times have changed.
8/13 So after 50% drawdown, people are *much* more interested in the valuation multiples debate today. Religion, politics, and valuation multiples are three topics I advise people to avoid with strangers. In any case, here's my math.
9/13 Multiples are function of growth, ROIC, and reinvestment runway. I'm using 30x FCF for a company that I'm underwriting ~20% topline growth for a decade. If SHOP can post 20% or more topline growth till 2030, I believe it's likely I'll generate at least HSD IRR here.
10/13 SHOP's take rate is currently ~2.7%. I'm giving Tobi and his team this whole decade to figure out how to increase it. If they can do it, that's great. If not, it may not be end of the world.
Every social-facing company wants to get into social commerce.
11/13 There is one common denominator everywhere. They all want to partner with SHOP's juggernaut of merchants. It's likely SHOP will be able to milk its privileged position in the broader retail operating system to eek out a bit more take rate than ~3%. We'll see.
12/13 Of course, 10 years is a LONG time, and a LOT can change. I'm not forecasting anything here; that's why I'm just expanding my exposure to the overall profit pool of a secular theme that I think is highly likely to sustain.
13/13 Given the pace of this downturn, I started with a small position and hope to scale up if SHOP continues to go down. Do your own due diligence, and happy hunting!
1/9 When Covid sell-off happened, I wrote down a few things on twitter which I still read from time to time. Always instructive to re-read what you're thinking when the market was under fire.
So here goes some thoughts.
2/9 This correction is likely to be more challenging psychologically than Covid drawdown, especially if the pace of drawdown doesn't die down and bottom doesn't appear in the next couple of months.
Everything was down during Covid.
3/9 You could tell yourself it's "okay" to not have pandemic in your scenario. I think a lot of the people may not be so forgiving to themselves this time.
They may introspect "what was I possibly thinking when I paid >50x sales?"
As an $IAC shareholder, I was curious about $TURO IPO (IAC owns ~27% of TURO) and was glancing through the S-1. Some quick notes.
What is TURO?
"Turo is the world’s largest car sharing marketplace where guests can book any car they want"
2/10 ~85k active hosts and ~160k active vehicle listings as of 3Q'21
Insurance is included for the trip.
"Since April 2020, every trip booked on our platform automatically generates a proprietary Turo Risk Score"
3/10 "As of September 30, 2021, we have collected data from over 23 million Days, 5.5 million transactions, 2.2 billion miles driven, and 10 years of claims data since inception to inform our proprietary Turo Risk Score algorithms and use more than 50 data inputs per…
I just closed the poll for deep dives in 2022. Some tight calls there, and some interesting data points about my subscribers.
Let me share the poll results in this thread.
2/ My email for the poll went out to ~800 annual subscribers. Open rate for the email was 71.4% and 298 participated in the poll. Pretty decent participation.
3/ Subscriber base for MBI Deep Dives is almost equally divided between individual investors and professional investors.
It's challenging to write for an audience with this level of diversity, but I relish it every month!
1/ Thread: My presentation for Bangladeshi startups
North South University (NSU), a Bangladeshi university, invited me today to talk about financial modeling for the startups they are incubating. I started with a disclaimer that I never built any model for any startup...
2/ So my presentation was largely more qualitative than quantitative.
One of the common misperceptions I think is many believe they just need to be better than the "average" investor to beat the market in the long-term. The reality is very, very different.
Let me explain.
2/6 Imagine 10 people started actively managing their money today. They all have $100. They invest for 30 years and they all generate different return over that period.
Three got completely wiped out. Five people generated between 1% and 5% CAGR.
3/6 Of the initial 10 people, you have 8 of them who have generated anemic returns over 30-yr period.
If you make better than 5%, you will be among the top 20 percentile. You can also *feel* much better than the average investor.