What do we teach when we teach "Medieval Europe"?
Do we teach Europe to set up Historical #Comparison?
OR to teach a Global (or, Alex West @siwaratrikalpa's much more coherent Hemispheric) #MiddleAges?
Here's how I see the two options...
(obvs others, I'm a Byzantinist after all)
My students discuss CWickham's intro in
Medieval Europe (2016; Review: I like the book)
CW argues for "Medieval Europe" as artificial category with value in setting up historical #comparison.
There's a cleverness to that.
But here's my problem, as explained to my students...
There is no comparison.
Practically speaking.
To do a comparison, you don't need to just find a region with some big similar stats (geog, pop, resources), you need to find something similarly studied, with comparable bibliographies.
MAYBE, in not too long, "Medieval China"?
Did I mention I'm a Byzantinist?
How does Byzantium fit into comparative discussions of "Medieval Europe"?
Hint: rhetorical question; always going to end up in a non sequitur.
Comparable region ("Eastern Mediterranean") hasn't been studied as such.
Or else--opps--it's sub-Europe:
Alternative: Global Middle Ages is the right instinct.
BUT it hasn't been given the right framework.
Alex West (@siwaratrikalpa)'s framework of the "HEMISPHERIC" Middle Ages works.
Two big payoffs of his proposed approach ... indomedieval.medium.com/the-hemispheri…
1. "Middle Ages" does actually work for a (broad, general) historical descriptor--a period when peoples across Afro-Eurasia were connected in certain ways.
It doesn't need to just be "artificial" and "for the sake of comparison".
Because ...
2. Medieval Peoples ALLLL across Afro-Eurasia
were CONNECTED & INTERACTING.
THAT's the story!
All the recent paradigm-shifting Black Death research
(vid.: Monica H. Green @monicaMedHist)
one-stop proof-texts this point:
Black Death IS Hemisphere-wide! smithsonianmag.com/history/did-bl…
Conclusions: "Medieval"/"Middle Ages" useful
NOT (old reason) bc "helps explain Europe today"
NOT (newish reason) bc useful analytic in
Global Comparative History
BUT bc is hella ACTUAL connectivity & interaction across Afro-Eurasia during the era
& we gotta learn about that.
Conclusions2:
Scholars of fields like #Byzantine Studies (me!), the Indian subcontinent & elsewhere
can stop working under oppressive need to make our area "comparable" to Europe.
Instead: learn how peoples connected & interacted.
Because that stuff is AMAZING and NEW.
/fin
2/ Acc. to this hist, key contexts for #Wesleyan’s AAUP:
-- a rich lib arts college into #highered “experimentation”
-- a “Little Uni” w/ PhD progs in sciences
-- square circle: low tenure density & high contingency
-- longstanding Junior Faculty Org (JFO) addressed contradiction
3/ @WesleyanAAUP hist notes contradictions in 1915-17 statements of @AAUP prez John #Dewey & co-found Arthur Lovejoy:
profs + trusteees collab on everything to do w/ education (curriculum to budget to donations);
admin there to "implement".
Nonetheless: profs salaried employees.
Arguing that 1) legal case is settled that #ExecutiveBranch has right to forgive student debt. 2) need is urgent: 89% of debtors will be in financial insecurity if required payments resume.
@SenWarren makes the point that $50k forgiven would release 36m citizens completely from debt.
A little #ByzantineHistory and #DH thread.
One project this semester is returning to data & visuals students & I pulled from chronicle of Theophanes.
Potentially can show a lot.
My interest: how ninth-century Constantinople saw the space of #Roman history.
Images all Jesse Simmons (superstar Res Assistant!).
This shows all cities/settlements in Chronicle of Theophanes.
One obvious thing (expected): East/West discrepancy.
One obvious thing (p'haps NOT expected): interest in Syria/Palestine over Greece!
We made the data sensitive to *when* (under what date) a city/settlement is mentioned.
Differentiates the "space" of different eras or emperors' reigns in the Chronicle.
Blue is "space" of Constantine's Rome (ca. 310-35)
Yellow is "space" of Irene & Nikephoros (ca. 780-810).