Supreme Court to today hear plea by Mamta Banerjee's election agent and Trinamool Congress leader SK Supian @ Sheikh Sufiyan accused of killing a Bhartiya Janta Party Supporter Debabrata Maiti at Chillogram in Nandigram after the results were declared. #postpollviolence
Supian has challenged the Calcutta High Court order dismissing his anticipatory bail application in the post-poll violence case. #postpollviolence
A division bench of Justice L Nageswara Rao and Justice BR Gavai had recently granted interim protection to Supian after remarking that the court can hear the matter only after the statements are placed on record.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal begins his submission on behalf of Supian.
Sibal: First chargesheet did not name me as an accused. After that matter was taken over by CBI.
Sibal: The charge-sheet relies upon statements made under Sec.164 CrPC. These statements did not even mention my name. I was not made an accused even under the second charge-sheet.
Sibal: Suvendu Adhikari made statements saying he will have me arrested along with a few others.
Court asks ASG Aman Lekhi to provide relevant documents to the petitioner.
Court: The statements made under S.164 by Manoj Kumar Behra and Sulekha have not been provided to them.
Court: Statements recorded on November 11 and 18 have not been given to them.
ASG Lekhi: The second charge-sheet filed on January 6 have relied on these statements.
Sibal: I have not been provided these statements.
Senior Advocate Paramjit Patwalia appears on behalf of wife of the deceased.
Court: There is already a server issue. If all of you speak together we cant understand a thing.
Court: We will hear it on Thursday. Make sure all replies have been served to all the parties concerned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court to continue hearing plea against marital rape exception in IPC.
@karunanundy for RIT Foundation: The last proposition of Independent Thought that is binding upon the present decision is that marriage is not institutional but personal.
Justice C Hari Shankar: Ms. Nundy is this your understanding of how the inversion test is applied according to Nevada.
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing the plea by a woman judge seeking reinstatement on the grounds that she was forced to resign as she was transferred for raising sexual harassment allegations. SGI to make submissions
SG:She substantiates her resignation on basis of 3 grounds.
Justice Gavai: After her transfer her representations were rejected. She had no other alternated.
SG: A mere incident of transfer based on rejection of representation is not enough to say its coercion
SG: She seeks the #SupremeCourt to declared that High Court connived together with others to enable her resignation. Findings of the committee were not challenged, so far as the transfer is concerned the committee says its irregular. This merely is no reason to say she was tormen
Kerala High Court recently dismissed a woman's appeal against #divorce decree noting that the #husband had been able to prove that he was treated with such cruelty that he had feared for his life.
The woman had alleged that she had been forced to leave her marital home, however, the husband had contended that on the contrary, she had deserted him as she had mental issues and used to exhibit excessive anger since the inception of marriage.
The husband had also alleged that she even used to threaten to kill him during his sleep. He had said that when he asked her to take treatment for her mental issues, she always denied pursuing proper medication.
The couple's daughters had also testified against their mother.
Salve: The petition is filed in the following circumstances of desperation. @RBI has come up with a scheme in 2020 for those who were hit by #Covid_19 . We entered into an agreement , it required certain payments. Assets had to be sold. We could not do so
#AllahabadHighCourt declines to handover the custody of minor girl child from her father to her mother in a habeas corpus writ petition.
Court said that in such matters, writ of habeas corpus will be entertainable only if the child has been detained illegally/without authority.
The couple had already filed for divorce. Taking this fact into account, court said that in such matters, the remedy would lie under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 or Guardians, and Wards Act, 1890 GWA, as the case may be and, accordingly, rejected woman's plea.
Marriage between child's parents had taken place in 2014 and she was born in 2016.
In 2020, following matrimonial disputes, her mother was allegedly kicked out of the house and since then she was seeking her child's custody.
#SupremeCourt will today hear the bail plea of #Punjab MLA Samarjit Singh Bains, a bailable warrant was issued against him after he failed to appear in a case pertaining to the violation of #Covid_19 norms.