Make sense to you?
“There is no need for mobilization in terms of the current threat. If we announce a training mobilization, it will cause panic in the streets. Everyone would consider that we knew something and concealed information that the enemy would attack tomorrow.”
“There is no need for mobilization in terms of the current threat. If we announce a training mobilization, it will cause panic in the streets. Everyone would consider that we knew something and concealed information that the enemy would attack tomorrow.”
No, me neither. uatv.ua/en/no-need-for…
“In terms of quantity of the soldiers of the armed forces of the Russian Federation, we are talking about a conditional 110,000 ground-to-ground component. Let us add the airborne and marine components, it would amount to 120,000-125,000 soldiers along the entire border ..
.. of Ukraine, including the administrative border, temporarily occupied Crimea. I repeat once again: the numbers are basically the same as in the spring of 2021.”
“At a time when our partners are already expecting a full-scale invasion almost tomorrow, about 400 foreign journalists from the USA, from UK, France, Germany, and other countries have applied for obtaining accreditation to the hostile zone. ..
.. These are not just war correspondents! Do you think any state would allow its citizens to take such risks if there was a real danger?”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
