#SupremeCourt notes that there are 19 cases where the accused has either passed away with appeals pending against their conviction or had already fulfilled their complete term of imprisonment
Justice SK Kaul accepts suggestion of Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal that the registry of Supreme Court should list such appeals expeditiously
SC: There is also a category where prisoners have undergone 14 years of custody. For disposal of such cases for grant of bail be listed expeditiously
SC: Registrar Judicial may also look into cases which are in after notice stage. #SupremeCourt
SC: We thank the amicus for the contribution to the larger cause of personal liberty of these individuals #SupremeCourt
Justice MM Sundresh suggests that if the amicus can point out the bottleneck where large number of such applications are rejected by such convicts. This is so that states can be called on to address the bottlenecks.
J Kaul: Some states have liberal and some conservative policy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Justice Kaul: so many courts have already noted that Forensic labs are lacking in numbers. You are a premier investigative agency and this is the condition.
Justice Kaul to ASG SV Raju: Also i dont want to recieve whatsapp messages concerning the case. Some one sneaks into my groups and leaves messages. We don't want to get into all of this.
Raju: I am a also a victim of this. Even I recieve such messages
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea regarding a challenge to the upper-age limit for the NEET exam. The plea challenges the upper-age limit of 25 years for general category and 30 years for the SC/ST category candidates appearing in #NEET
Adv Gaurav Sharma appears for the respondent: the requirement if two year continuous study of 11th and 12th was always there
Sharma: The affidavits filed by the petitioners clearly show that they were aware of 11th and 12th class. In the present case students passed 12th but did not clear 11th
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by @amazon against a January 5 Division bench order of Delhi HC staying arbitration proceedings initiated by Amazon before a Singapore tribunal even when the tribunal proceedings were underway
Staying arbitration proceedings, the Division Bench stated there is a “prima facie case” in favour of the Future group companies in view of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) suspending its clearance given to Amazon’s 2019 deal with Future Coupons (FCPL) #AmazonvsFuture
CJI NV Ramana: sorry to say that papers have highlighted my observations. But future also wants to drag the matter. Anyways issue notice and list it next week #AmazonVsFuture
Sr Adv Nakul Dewan mentions the Amazon Future dispute
Dewan: We just wish to file the written submissions.
CJI NV Ramana: if you want to complicate, drag on and continue this type of litigation. Orders are reserved and now you file and other side will reply #SupremeCourt
CJI: I don't understand what is the practice. If that day you mentioned then it was fine. Now ask other party if they are fine with other side. We can't pass orders behind their back
Sr Adv KV Vishwanathan: This is a tactic to delay. I am opposing this.
Dewan appears for Amazon: We just need to crystallise the submissions of Sr Adv Gopal Subramaniam
CJI: If you think we cannot understand oral submissions. Then okay file. You so file Mr Vishwanathan