Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi submits that as per Shayara Bano case, assuming a religious text permits doing of something need not necessarily mean that it is essential to that religion.
There is nothing in Karnataka Education Act which deals with uniform. There is residual rule making power but rule making power cannot go beyond Act. Even if assuming State has power, can it be exercised this way, No.
Kamat: State has said it has not made any decision but has left it to college development committee. That is worse because we are the mercy of some committee for exercise of fundamental rights.
My interim prayer is this: If GO says there is no restriction, then allow us to go attend classes wearing hijab. Please don't leave me at the mercy of principal and committee for exercise of fundamental rights: Kamat
Sajan Poovayya on behalf of College Development Committee says the prescription of uniform existed year on year. It is not something new. For this academic year, a resolution was passed as early as June last year indicating what the uniform is.
Nobody complained about it until now. Now it is being raised as if it is some artificial prescription coming out if nowhere. They don't have any prima facie case for interim protection: Poovayya
I will produce material that year on year, at the beginning of academic year, the CDC met, and passed resolutions after consulting all stakeholders, on uniformity of school uniforms: Poovayya
They have been followed from time to time until some artificial intervention from outside as if heavens are falling and there is some exclusion. There is no exclusion. Even these petitioners are students who have complied with the order: Poovayya.
Order: Considering the enormity of questions that are debated, this Court is of the opinion that the papers be kept before the Chief Justice if a larger Bench can be constituted to hear the subject matter.
Justice Kaul: so many courts have already noted that Forensic labs are lacking in numbers. You are a premier investigative agency and this is the condition.
Justice Kaul to ASG SV Raju: Also i dont want to recieve whatsapp messages concerning the case. Some one sneaks into my groups and leaves messages. We don't want to get into all of this.
Raju: I am a also a victim of this. Even I recieve such messages
#SupremeCourt notes that there are 19 cases where the accused has either passed away with appeals pending against their conviction or had already fulfilled their complete term of imprisonment
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea regarding a challenge to the upper-age limit for the NEET exam. The plea challenges the upper-age limit of 25 years for general category and 30 years for the SC/ST category candidates appearing in #NEET
Adv Gaurav Sharma appears for the respondent: the requirement if two year continuous study of 11th and 12th was always there
Sharma: The affidavits filed by the petitioners clearly show that they were aware of 11th and 12th class. In the present case students passed 12th but did not clear 11th
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by @amazon against a January 5 Division bench order of Delhi HC staying arbitration proceedings initiated by Amazon before a Singapore tribunal even when the tribunal proceedings were underway
Staying arbitration proceedings, the Division Bench stated there is a “prima facie case” in favour of the Future group companies in view of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) suspending its clearance given to Amazon’s 2019 deal with Future Coupons (FCPL) #AmazonvsFuture
CJI NV Ramana: sorry to say that papers have highlighted my observations. But future also wants to drag the matter. Anyways issue notice and list it next week #AmazonVsFuture
Sr Adv Nakul Dewan mentions the Amazon Future dispute
Dewan: We just wish to file the written submissions.
CJI NV Ramana: if you want to complicate, drag on and continue this type of litigation. Orders are reserved and now you file and other side will reply #SupremeCourt
CJI: I don't understand what is the practice. If that day you mentioned then it was fine. Now ask other party if they are fine with other side. We can't pass orders behind their back
Sr Adv KV Vishwanathan: This is a tactic to delay. I am opposing this.
Dewan appears for Amazon: We just need to crystallise the submissions of Sr Adv Gopal Subramaniam
CJI: If you think we cannot understand oral submissions. Then okay file. You so file Mr Vishwanathan