Trying to make sense of this. In Feb 16, Zillow said they were involved in 3.1% of transaction sides in 2014 and 3.9% in 2015. Yesterday said were involved in 3% in 2021. So sides were down from 2015 to 2021 and PA revs as % of agent commissions generated are 33%, up from 10%. ImageImageImage
I don't know if its a different methodology or I'm doing something wrong. But now they are forecasting doubling transactions involved in to 6% by 2025. So would love to understand the trajectory from 2015 to now, to better handicap the likelihood of 2021 to 2025.
Zillow now says prior to 2019 they couldn't calculate the number of transactions that they were responsible for. But the fewer transactions they were responsible for, the higher the ratio of PA revs to commissions generated, meaning less upside in PA 4.0 and Flex etc. Image
With PA revs to commissions generated at 33%, Flex is now seen more as a conversion driver than generating upside per transaction. The initial rationale I thought was that they were leaving money on the table, but that seems not the case. Need to drive transaction counts. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with modest proposal

modest proposal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @modestproposal1

Feb 11
Latest attempt at sizing the ad platforms*. These are my estimates and probably wrong. Posting Gross Profit $ first, because of different margin structures, and most people don't click to the second tweet in a thread, and I think GP$ are more important.

*ex TikTok
Here's ad platform revenue estimates. TikTok is supposedly $4B in 2021 and $12B in 2022 to put it into perspective.
An interesting way to look at it is by y/y change in dollars added to revenue. For instance, Google Search grew $12.8B in 2019, down almost 20% Y/Y. In 2021 it added $44.4B!

Snapchat is the only platform that on current estimates will grow dollars added in 2022 vs 2021.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
fascinating thread on what *may* explain the huge gap between economic conditions and consumer confidence
As of July, the gap basically didn't exist
Cohn posits the gap opened up as the public recoiled at the Afghanistan withdrawal, not due to anything about the economy
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
When guests vis­ited Mr. Kilmis­ter’s home and were of­fered a drink, he of­ten handed them an en­tire bot­tle of Jack—as though it were a beer, Mr. Ol­liver said. He said the late Mr. Kilmis­ter was sel­dom drunk but car­ried on life with “an even-keeled buzz.”
Mr. Quint and his team cre­ated a blend of 40% bour­bon with 60% rye that would make for a spicy and pep­pery fla­vor pro­file. The re­sult­ing Slip­knot No. 9 is de­scribed by one re­viewer as “quite flo­ral, with notes of hon­ey­suckle and lily.”
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
This Q reiterates the point. They beat estimates in the most competitive market, and they announced price increases, so idea that competition is the problem doesnt hold IMO.

The longstanding question remains, what level of subs can be gained in APAC/LATAM at what price point.
Per a thread last week, Nathanson raising the issue that perhaps an ad supported mobile only tier is going to be necessary in EMs in order to get the type of penetration they expect.
Nathanson been for years "is streaming a good business". Like me asking is ecommerce a good business. In general, no! Streaming and ecomm for the median co are shittier businesses than linear tv/B&M retail. The winners are very valuable, because scale trumps inferior economics.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
“The final feature of the great superbubbles has been a sustained narrowing of the market and unique underperformance of speculative stocks, many of which fall as the blue chip market rises. This occurred in 1929, in 2000, and it is occurring now.“
No points for guessing who wrote it gmo.com/americas/resea…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 12
Great note from @darioperkins on challenges of analyzing post covid economy:

"Much of the confusion about the current state of the economy has its origin in people trying to
apply classic business-cycle analysis to COVID-19 macro distortions... But this is not a business cycle"
"Faulty business-cycle analysis has unduly influenced inflation debate, rapid price gains assumed to be a sign of “overheating”. Yet GDP in most of the world is ~ where it was expected to be in the absence of pandemic... two years ago, the main debate was about a liquidity trap"
"In short, investors must be careful not to infer “new secular growth trends” from what might merely be “levels” effects associated with (and largely confined to) the pandemic."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(