Saudi Arabia got released some footage of "Iranian missiles in Yemen in 2017" that turned out to be "Saddam's missiles in Iraq from 2003" that someone stole from a documentary, #SevereClear A short thread on a wild story by @garymbaum in @THR.
The Saudis showed a satellite image of a port in Yemen where the claimed, followed by "secret" video showing the missiles. @miis_ford translated the slides. ImageImage
The problem, as many online observers pointed out, is that the video of the missiles is taken from a documentary about the invasion of Iraq called "Severe Clear." The Saudis showed a brief excerpt three times; the full clip that I added shows the full clip with US soldiers.
This was really lazy, or contemptuous, on the part of the Saudis. First, you can just reverse image search a still and Google will tell you it is from the movie. Image
Second, the missiles are "Al Samud II" short-range ballistic missiles. The briefer doesn't really give you a good look, but the missiles in the video they show have the same access panels as the Al Samud II. ImageImageImage
The gyroscope plate is also the same. You don't really need Sherlock Holmes here to do this identification. Iraq used a small number of these missiles in the 2003 Gulf War. I would be shocked if no one recognized their old friend. ImageImage
Third, an analyst could have tried to gelocate the video at the port. The arrow in the slide points at one building that simply isn't a match at all. (below). Most of the other buildings are trashed; none are a good match for the roof, windows, etc. Image
All of which is to say, this video would have been easy to verify if someone had many any effort at all. My students in the @MIIS #OSINT course can do, and routinely do, much better. This was either very lazy or deeply contemptuous of public opinion.
So many typos.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArmsControlWonk

Feb 11
The idea that international pressure can indefinitely keep Iran as a nuclear threshold state strikes me as one of the dumbest ideas I I have ever seen held by a government official.
Reminds me when I told a Japanese official that North Korea would test an ICBM and a thermonuclear weapon soon.
"Be patient, we need to give sanctions a few years to work."
"You don't have years."
That was November 2016.
Iran as a threshold state is almost certainly going to end up as Iran the opaque proliferator. I seem to recall some other state in the region that made that particular journey.
armscontrol.org/act/2007-06/fe… The general picture from th...
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30
A brief guide to DPRK missile watching online.

North Korea is going to be launching a lot of interesting stuff again. Here's the information we get, where we get it from and when.
Within minutes, the ROK Joint Chiefs of Staff usually texts an announcement to reporters first. This appears in @YonhapNews, ROK's state media, which will update the story repeatedly through the day, adding details each time. Yonhap has issued four versions of the story already. Image
The details usually include the time of launch, place, distance and apogee. The ROK used to give flight-time; lately they've been giving burnout velocity in the form of a Mach number. These estimates are rounded and often don't match what the North Koreans will later say.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 30
It's probably a 4,500 km-range Hwasong-12 IRBM based on the trajectory. Compare:

Hwasong-12 test on May 14 2012:
787 km range
2,111.5 km apogee
~30 minute flight time.

UI missile test on January 29, 2022
800 km range
>2000 km apogee
~30 minute flight time Image
North Korea has tested a lot missiles recently, but this is a big step. In 2018, Kim announced a moratorium on intermediate- and intercontinental-range ballistic missile launches. North Korea has now broken that moratorium. ICBM tests are almost certain to follow.
I should say: The ROK/GOJ numbers could turn out to be wrong. Or it could be a new missile, like a solid, with a similar range as the Hwasong-12. We won't know until we see pictures tomorrow. So, caveat lector. But for now, it looks like a Hwasong-12.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 6
A short thread on North Korea's "hypersonic" missile test. It's a MaRV.
All long-range missiles are hypersonic! The range of a ballistic missile is, to a first approximation, a function of the velocity of a missile at burnout. Any ballistic missile that travels more than a few hundred kilometers will be traveling faster than Mach 5 (1.75 km/s).
What North Korea tested was a hypersonic glider. The system flew 700 km. The warhead separated at some point and glided for a few hundred kilometers, including a 120 km cross-range glide. I mocked up some trajectories; they're only sort of to scale.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 5
I was quoted in this @defense_news story about Morocco's expanding air defense capabilities. Don't feel like writing a blog post, so here's a thread on what little I was able to add with OSINT.
defensenews.com/global/mideast…
In December, a Spanish-language publication reported that Morocco had taken delivery of some very capable Chinese surface-to-air missiles (HQ-9B/FD-2000B).
defensa.com/africa-asia-pa…
Defensa.com said the missiles were deployed at Morocco's "first military base dedicated to long-range air defense ... near the city of Sidi Yahya el-Gharb" and published a May 2021 satellite image from @googleearth of the site.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 23, 2021
This amazing reporting by @ZcohenCNN is exactly the kind of collaboration that @JamesMartinCNS wants to continue with @CNN and @planet. I think it is civil society at its best. A short thread.
In 2013, @JanesINTEL identified a missile base at this location; a few years later @fab_hinz noticed that the sit had changed significantly. We ultimately assessed the place was a Chinese constructed missile facility:
washingtonpost.com/world/national…
Our story prompted people in Congress to start asking questions. Eventually someone spilled the beans. The Trump Administration was actively withholding this information from Congress, @ZcohenCNN reported. cnn.com/2019/06/05/pol…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(