Thread by @WesleyBKress

(1\11)

1. This is because most people try to imprint or transfer their understanding of POS & POW directly to $SAITO or they try to take fragmented facts & imprint the rest as if it’s understood. In the video describing this, Validators which are $SAITO nodes don’t get paid

https://twitter.com/DBCrypt0/status/1492525837396189188

(2\11) immediately but they do get paid. The Validators collect TX’s ie value coming into the network. They are incentivized based on the consensus to pass the TX’s to the next Validator or miner along the path as they want to be sure to collect as many Golden Lottery tickets

(3\11) along the way. This is how they get paid. The hops are how $SAITO quantifies the amount to be paid, the golden ticket lottery & as well as the way the initiation for the Lottery is triggered. For instance after a certain amount of time the front facing nodes will have

(4\11) enough in their Meme pool to qualify for the Golden Lottery ticket. The miners are incentive to find the solution as they will get part of the pay split as of now 50% goes to paying Validator/Routing nodes and 50% goes to paying miners. This can be adjusted. Also, the

(5\11) Validator/Routing node that hits the threshold will be much further behind than the nodes behind them that have been collecting TX’s for the network, allowing for decentralization of value distribution (ie allowing for decentralization by design). Also, there is no

(6\11) barrier to entry meaning that anyone can run the $SAITO Validator/Routing nodes by downloading the client & waiting for a round of the history to be shared.
2. It’s important to understand that the rebroadcasting deals with the DATA on the chain being rebroadcasted not

(7\11) the original HASH & transaction. This means that there is always a full history but to keep DATA on chain it has a cost. This is why all blockchains have a Tragedy of the Commons issue which Saito Solves. People are incentivized to do as much DATA on the chain because

(8\11) there is not a known market price to making sure that all the DATA being kept on chain is paid for. This is one of the main economic problems. These problems are known as the Tragedy of the commons is the issue with not understanding that dumping of the DATA that cost

(9\11) is not being adequately accounted for will lead to a collapse of the Blockchain. Miners and stakers today can offload this cost to the future due to the economics
3. An example of a TX’s DATA not TX (history = hash to original provenance on Blockchain) no longer

(10\11) wanting to pay for the rebroadcast fee would be a 1 year full document 📄 of Life Insurance where they needed and wanted it to be on chain but possibly after year 3 it no longer made sense to keep the Data of the document on chain just the TX’s hash provenance to keep

(11\11) the historical record of occurrence.
Thus any idea around a security risk is unfounded. I think it originates from not understanding that the ATR fee is for DATA but NOT for historical provenance of the TX occurring that never goes away