#SupremeCourt to hear petition seeking a direction to the Central government to frame a Model Builder Buyer Agreement to ensure transparency and to protect the interests of homebuyers as per the aims of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 @AshwiniUpadhyay
Sr Adv Menaka Guruswamy: The Solicitor General was asked to get response of the Centre. It's about how union can be involved in law reforms in this area. Sections 41 and 42 of RERA provides of central advisory council
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: The model BBA has already been adopted and circulated. We have said so in the counter too. For those UTs who did not the law, onus was on centre to provide the agreement
Bhati: Please see the statutory rules annexed herein. It was filed..
Bhati: We are submitting that small amount of leeway can be given to small builders
Guruswamy: Centre has always said that state govt notifies its own rules. But we are saying this kind of fractured legislation is the issue
DYC J: we have the slum rehabilitate authority in Mumbai but that may be not anywhere else
Guruswamy: Centre says they don't have power but it's not correct. We have no quarrel with local laws
SC: You can formulate some common minimum norms which must be there and then leave it to the states
Bhati: This has already been done. Union is not shirking away from its responsibilities
SC: Have you examined all state rules to see that buyers interest is not compromised?
SC: Have you seen all state rules to see that it adopts the essential ingredients of the rules by RERA and buyers interest is not compromised.
Bhati: There has been threadbare comparison with states where there are heavy constructions.
SC: Tell us that you have examined all rules of states. States which have not been examined should be done so now
Bhati: West Bengal has not followed it.
SC: Mr Bharuka had filed an MA asking RERA to be used in WB. But we said that it cannot be done so by the MA. But we recorded the statement.
Bhati: we will conduct this excercise and report back.
SC: Ms Guruswamy you also examine that if state rules follow the essence of RERA rules
Guruswamy: Niti Aayog which is a part of Central Advisory Council can also look into it.
J. Surya Kant: Wherever you find there is a discrepancy, we can direct the state to adopt the rules therein.
Bhati: The audio of the court is disrupted. We only hear the beginning of sentence and last of it. Please get it rectified
Guruswamy: it is just like the model BBA!
SC: We will come back in 5 minutes and see this.
ASG Bhati suggests that Mr Bharuka may be appointed as an amicus in the case
SC ORDER: Centre has filed a compilation of additional documents. On Nov 5 2016 RERA had formulated rules and all states were requested to forward copy of rules as notified.
SC: compliance is yet to be made by WB , some North eastern states and Jammu and Kashmir. This excercise be carried out at two levels. Union Ministry for Housing shall scrutinize the state rules and report to this court if they comply with the 2016 rules by centre
SC: We also appoint Mr Bharuka as the amicus in this case and also assist this court is carrying out this excercise #modelBBA
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The High Court had on February 10 barred students from wearing hijab, bhagwa and other religious garments in educational institutions which have a prescribed dress code/ uniform.
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench hears an appeal by National Medical Commission in a case
Justice DY Chandrachud: This is a case where in a padeatric ward all children were admitted without any problems. Have you seen the Munnabhai MBBS movie counsel ?
#SupremeCourt to hear plea stating that ₹8 lakh cut-off for inclusion in the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) criteria cannot be implemented for #NEETPG202223 (NEET PG 2022-23) since EWS issue is pending before SC & would be taken up for hearing in March, 2022 @advocate_tanvi
Dr Charu Mathur requests for Passover
Justice Chandrachud: What is this petition. How can we stop the process ..we will decide the matter in March
Mathur: it's about the window deadline
DYC J: That we cannot stop. If authorities have set out a window then so be it
SC: When we are looking at under Article 32 se will pass directions at appropriate time under the Dr Nunes case
Mathur: but there is no whisper of Dr Nunes in the prospectus of NEET PG 2022 23
Karnataka High Court is set to pronounce its judgment in a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act, 2021, which prohibits and criminalises betting on and playing games of skill, including online games.
#KarnatakaHC: We have no struck down the entire act.
However, the consequences of striking down the provisions shall follow. However, nothing in this judgement should be construed to prevent an apt legislation from being brought about concerning the subject
The investigation related to a complaint in 2015-16 where Anand Subramanian was hired as a Group Operating Officer / Advisor to MD at a salary of 1.6 crores. This was a 10 fold jump from Rs. 15 Lakhs which he was drawing in his previous job at Balmer & Lawrie @NSEIndia#SEBI
Anand Subramanian was appointed without any advertisement for the post and interview.
He was on a 4 DAY WORK / WEEK and his compensation jumped to 4 crores in April 2016.
He travelled FIRST CLASS and was in Chennai every WEEKEND.
In a democracy, different yardsticks cannot be applied for different religions. Ghungats, bindis, turbans, dupattas, scarves and so on are in a similar league: Meenakshi Arora