Justice DY Chandrachud led bench hears an appeal by National Medical Commission in a case
Justice DY Chandrachud: This is a case where in a padeatric ward all children were admitted without any problems. Have you seen the Munnabhai MBBS movie counsel ?
SC: NMC as well as Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College is before this court against HC order. The order was by Bombay HC order of Jan 25, 2022
Justice Chandrachud observes in between of dictating order: what we have observed is shocking in terms of the inspection.
SC: The medical College which was established in 1992 with an intake capacity of 100 seats for MBBS course. The medical College submitted an application on Nov 2020 for increase in capacity to 150 for 2021-22
SC: On July 15 renewal license was granted that continuation of recognition will be in accordance with law. The assessors appointed by the NMC conducted a physical inspection on Oct 8/9 2021 and a letter on intent was issued
SC: College submitted a letter of undertaking and thereafter intake capacity was increased. On Jan 14, 2022, surprise inspection was conducted. Based on the report, on Jan 19 NMC withdrew increase in intake
SC: It directed admissions to stop for 2021-22. Writ was filed before Aurangabad bench of Bombay HC by college. By Jan 25 order, an option was given to medical College to either go for reinspection or avail of appellate remedy
SC: The college said it will go for fresh re-inspection. The HC order has been challenged by the NMC saying HC order has been passed without noticing provision of NMC act.
SC: It appears that medical College also filed a civil application to modify earlier Jan 25 order on the ground that grounds urged before HC was not dealt with.
SC: HC has recorded that medical College has accepted re inspection proposal. Both medical College and NMC is aggrieved by the HC order. NMC says gross negligence was observed during the inspection.
SC: Medical College says there cannot be any dispute about the original complement of 100 seats. HC has not dealt with submission by rival parties and thus we cannot intervene under Article 136. We set aside the impugned orders of HC and restore the plea before HC
SC: SG Tushar Mehta appeared for NMC, Dr Singhvi and MR Nishesh Gupta appeared for the medical College. All rights remain open before HC. #supremecourt
[Hospital admitting fake patients] Have you seen Munnabhai MBBS? Supreme Court to medical college
The High Court had on February 10 barred students from wearing hijab, bhagwa and other religious garments in educational institutions which have a prescribed dress code/ uniform.
#SupremeCourt to hear petition seeking a direction to the Central government to frame a Model Builder Buyer Agreement to ensure transparency and to protect the interests of homebuyers as per the aims of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 @AshwiniUpadhyay
Sr Adv Menaka Guruswamy: The Solicitor General was asked to get response of the Centre. It's about how union can be involved in law reforms in this area. Sections 41 and 42 of RERA provides of central advisory council
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: The model BBA has already been adopted and circulated. We have said so in the counter too. For those UTs who did not the law, onus was on centre to provide the agreement
#SupremeCourt to hear plea stating that ₹8 lakh cut-off for inclusion in the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) criteria cannot be implemented for #NEETPG202223 (NEET PG 2022-23) since EWS issue is pending before SC & would be taken up for hearing in March, 2022 @advocate_tanvi
Dr Charu Mathur requests for Passover
Justice Chandrachud: What is this petition. How can we stop the process ..we will decide the matter in March
Mathur: it's about the window deadline
DYC J: That we cannot stop. If authorities have set out a window then so be it
SC: When we are looking at under Article 32 se will pass directions at appropriate time under the Dr Nunes case
Mathur: but there is no whisper of Dr Nunes in the prospectus of NEET PG 2022 23
Karnataka High Court is set to pronounce its judgment in a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act, 2021, which prohibits and criminalises betting on and playing games of skill, including online games.
#KarnatakaHC: We have no struck down the entire act.
However, the consequences of striking down the provisions shall follow. However, nothing in this judgement should be construed to prevent an apt legislation from being brought about concerning the subject
The investigation related to a complaint in 2015-16 where Anand Subramanian was hired as a Group Operating Officer / Advisor to MD at a salary of 1.6 crores. This was a 10 fold jump from Rs. 15 Lakhs which he was drawing in his previous job at Balmer & Lawrie @NSEIndia#SEBI
Anand Subramanian was appointed without any advertisement for the post and interview.
He was on a 4 DAY WORK / WEEK and his compensation jumped to 4 crores in April 2016.
He travelled FIRST CLASS and was in Chennai every WEEKEND.
In a democracy, different yardsticks cannot be applied for different religions. Ghungats, bindis, turbans, dupattas, scarves and so on are in a similar league: Meenakshi Arora