1. Miami just overtook NY and LA and of course the Bay Area as the nation's most unaffordable housing market. This trend was patently obvious for sometime, and does not bode well for the region or other hot rising centers. therealdeal.com/miami/2022/02/…
2. Miami's housing market has soared driven by an influx of rich, indeed super-rich buyers from NY, LA and other places. Houses are routinely being flipped for multiples of their pre-pandemic values
3. The hand writing was on the wall even before the pandemic. For context, let me send along links to several reports we did for the now defunct @MIAUrbanFuture. Here's one from 2019 on ehem Miami's housing affordability crisis: digitalcommons.fiu.edu/mufi-reports/6/
7. The fact of the matter is that a metro like Miami is not equipped to handle this kind of growth. The influx of out-of-towners - the global super-rich - puts extraordinary pressure on the housing market ... and more.
8. And local wages/ incomes are low, in what is still mainly a hospitality and tourism economy, among the lowest in the country. Although things are changing, the Miami economy still looks more like Las Vegas than NY or the Bay Area.
9. And it's not just the poor and the essential workforce - think workforce housing - that are priced out, increasingly professionals/knowledge workers are priced out.
10. Then there is the traffic, the pressure on schools, the lack of slots at private schools ... I could go on.
11. And this is not just a Miami problem, it is impacting all the rising COVID big sort metros - Austin, Denver, Nashville, and ZoomTowns like Bozeman, NY's Hudson Valley, and on and on.
12. Some call this "trickle down" migration, and it is. But it adds up to a rapidly metastasizing housing affordability crisis. I am getting an earful about lack of inventory, bidding wars, & unaffordability in just about every place I visit ...
13. When outsiders from bigger, more affluent cities come in, they quickly housing prices up. If a metro like Miami with 5-6 million people cannot scale sufficiently to absorb this influx, it becomes that much harder in smaller metros.
14. What is unique and exceptional about Miami is that with very few exceptions, there is a general unwillingness to even raise or discuss or have a conversation about such challenges. The default is a kind of extreme boosterism.
15. Miami lacks the civic institutions like the RPA or Center for an Urban Future in NY, or SPUR in San Francisco, or universities in Boston - or even that exist in Austin, Denver, Nashville to focus and mobilize around the key challenges.
16. Hard to see how these issues of housing affordability, inequity, transit all elements of the New Urban Crisis that have already hurt coastal superstar cities can be addressed.
17. These become real limits to growth. Perhaps the region can continue to "grow" based on imported capital. But these problems can only worsen.
18. This is why I increasingly like to say the New Urban Crisis has super quickly become an almost Everywhere Crisis.
19. It will be interesting to see which of America's rising metros can effectively address these challenges.
20. At the end of the day, the reason we have very few US metros over 6 million people is that cities are very, very hard things to scale ...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Fantastic and fantastically interesting new @nberpubs study by @rebeccardiamond and Enrico Moretti on cost of living differentials by class of workers across US cities: nber.org/papers/w29533
2. The study documents HUGE differentials in living costs/quality of life across US metros ...
3. Expensive coastal metros are ... well ... really expensive.
1. The world of innovation is spiky and appears to be getting spikier, according the later NBER working paper by Bill Kerr and Brad Chattergoon at Harvard Business School: nber.org/papers/w29456?…
2. The study tracks patents for all patents, and for software and non-software patents from January 1976-December 2020. Here are some of the key findings ...
3. "U.S. patenting has become much more spatially concentrated around tech clusters like SanFrancisco and Boston compared to the 1970s, making these places more productive for researchers ... important for business organization, and central to high-tech startups."
2. "Traditional theories of cities emphasize production decisions and the costs of workers commuting between their workplace and residence."
3. "However, much of the travel that occurs within urban areas is related not to commuting but rather to the consumption of nontraded services, such as trips to restaurants, coffee shops and bars, shopping centers,
cultural venues, and other services."
1. A quick thread on the new book Survival of the City by Ed Glaeser & David Cutler. Just finished it this afternoon. It's terrific. A must, must read. There is a lot to the book, so I'll focus on what it has to say for cities and urbanization.
2. First off, it's an extremely well-crafted book - a GREAT READ.
3. For me the highlight of the book are the chapters which trace the history of pandemics & plagues & their impacts on cities and urbanization. It's clear Glaeser loves this material and that he has a penchant for economic history and it shines as a high point of the book.
1. Interested in the future of downtowns & central business districts. Let's take a little time machine back to 1958 and see what Jane Jacobs had to say on the subject in her seminal essay, "Downtown Is for People." innovationecosystem.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/6…
2. "We are accustomed to thinking of downtowns as divided into functional districts – financial, shopping, theatre – and so they are, but only to a degree."
3. "As soon as an area gets too exclusively devoted to one
type of activity and its direct convenience services,
it gets into trouble; it loses its appeal to the users
of downtown and it is in danger of becoming a
has-been."