We fail to understand this concept of intervention applications. We will hear petitioners and respondents and if we think it is required, we will seek your (intervenors') assistance: CJ Ritu Raj Awasthi
Article 51(c) is a fundamental duty to foster respect for international law and treaty obligations in the dealings of organised peoples with one another; and encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.
He Refers to Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18 - "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private"
Kothwal also refers to Convention on Elimination of discrimination against women. It has been ratified by India in 1993.
I don't have personal interest in this matter: Kothwal
Are you aware of PIL rules? Bench
Court now asking petitioner to show compliance with rules on PIL.
You are wasting time of the court in such an important and serious matter, pagination not proper. You are wasting time which can otherwise be used by your friends: Justice Krishna Dixit
Kindly pass an order today to wear hijab on Fridays which is auspicious day for Muslims and during the coming month of Ramzan. That is my prayer: Dr. Kulkarni
It is disturbing the mental health of individuals, and the Koran cannot be ignored. Hijab is not against public order or health or morality. Enough has been said about that, I will not dwell on it: Dr. Kulkarni
This GO is cryptic in nature, unconstitutional and illegal. We don't need judgments from Tanzania or London. When the Constitution came into being, up to 1960 there was no problem: Dar
We have to analyse the GO in the light of parameters in of Constitution of India which is a sacred book: Dar
Justice Dixit: Our Writ petition rules have adopted the rules of the Civil Procedure Code. You have not complied with these. Which institution are your petitioners studying, how have they been stopped from going to school?
Jha says Bombay and Kerala High Courts have addressed this and held this is not an integral part of Islam. There is an answer for all issues that have been raked up: Jha
Constitutional issues are involved. We need to answer it. Mediation cannot be done in this manner. It can be done only between consenting parties: CJ Awasthi
Karnataka High Court Bench rises for the day. Hearing to resume at 2.30 pm tomorrow. State through Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi likely to commence its arguments tomorrow.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea seeking quashing of the recovery notices issued by the Uttar Pradesh administration to recover the damage caused to public properties in connection with protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in the state #antiCAAProtests
During the last hearing, the bench observed that the Uttar Pradesh government has acted like a "complainant, adjudicator and prosecutor" by itself in conducting the proceedings to attach the properties of the accused #SupremeCourt
UP AAG: We have honoured the courts observations. All showcause notices have been withdrawn. District magistrates were also informed. All 275 files were also sent to the claims tribunal
Delhi Court to hear rebuttal arguments of Umar Khalid in an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act connected to Delhi Riots. #UmarKhalid#UAPA#DelhiRiots
Previously, for co-accused Khalid Saifi, senior advocate Rebecca John argued there was no 'conspiracy of silence' in criminal law only conspiracy, contesting a submission of the prosecution. #UmarKhalid#UAPA#DelhiRiots
Hearing starts. Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat presides. Senior Advocate Trideep Pais is representing Khalid. Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad appears for state. #UmarKhalid#UAPA#DelhiRiots
@vikramsampath has approached the High Court seeking Rs 2 Crore in compensation from these historians and an injunction on publication of the letter where allegations of plagiarism were raised. barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Justice Amit Bansal will start the hearing shortly.
#SupremeCourt to hear Haryana Government's challenge to the Punjab and Haryana High Court order which stayed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 which grants 75 percent reservation to Haryana domiciles in private sector jobs @mlkhattar#domicile
SG Mehta: What we could gather is that there are 4 states which has such a legislation
SG: This is for class 3 and class 4. domicile is approved by the court. There is no employment. 70 percent of these two courses could be reserved for them.
SC: Do you want us to transfer all the pending cases back here. Should we decide or decide on the stay and send to HC?