Too late, too expensive, too risky and too uncertain. That, in a nutshell, describes NuScale’s planned small modular reactor project. 🧵(1/9) #nuclear#energytwitter#nuclearcosts
Communities and utilities are being lured to buy electricity from NuScale’s planned #nuclear reactor at the promise of a relatively low price of $58/MWh. But that’s only an estimate—and a flawed one at that. via @pfannyyy (2/9) postregister.com/news/inl/easte…
The #UAMPS power sales agreement for this nuclear project is essentially a blank check. Buyers who stick with the project will be on the hook for the actual costs and expenses of building and operating the reactor, which we predict will far exceed $58/MWh. @SmartEnergy1 (3/9)
NuScale claims it will be able to complete the #nuclear-related construction quickly and cheaply due to modularization. But this claim has been made by other power companies, and it hasn’t stacked up to reality. via @SmithRebecca (4/9) wsj.com/articles/pre-f…
Georgia Power Company made similar claims about modularization reducing the cost of the Vogtle 3 and 4 #nuclear reactors currently under construction in Georgia. But that project’s cost has increased by 140% since construction began in 2012. (5/9)
NuScale claims that the nuclear construction at its first SMR will be completed in less than 36 months. However, other recently built #nuclear plants have taken between 103 and 113 months to complete. (6/9)
NuScale faces an impossible task: its nuclear project must achieve a 95% capacity factor for power to remain cheap. At the same time, it must live up to promises of flexibility. If the project is ramping up and down, it can’t consistently maintain a 95% capacity factor. (7/9)
No matter how you cut it, the price of power from this #nuclear project will be higher—perhaps much higher—than the estimated target price of $58/MWh. And much higher than already existing alternatives from #renewables. (8/9)
Global oil majors are back in the black—but for how long?
Something is different about this #oilprice spike. Instead of rushing to drill, oil companies are cutting their capex, reducing debt and paying more to shareholders.
What’s going on here? 🧵
Former sources of value have become vehicles for destroying value. Investors—and, we suspect, even company management—understand that more drilling and expensive acquisitions are a bad bet.
High oil prices mean renewable energy, EVs and the variety of industrial moves to decarbonize are incentivized. Even volatility, the short-term problem caused by rising prices, is sufficient to drive calls for more rapid adoption of alternative fuels. ieefa.org/ieefa-u-s-pric…
Carbon capture and sequestration (or CCS) is being touted by some as a potential solution for #decarbonization in industries like cement and steelmaking. But how promising of a solution is it? A deep dive 🧵
There is only limited experience with CCS at industrial facilities beyond gas processing. Only one steel mill in the entire world (and no cement plants), capture CO2. Little info is available about how much they capture, and key info about cost and reliability is missing.
Only 3 of 26 CCS projects currently operating in the world have reported any information that would allow their “capture rates” to be determined. Without this information, it’s impossible to show that any existing CCS projects are economically, financially or technically viable.
Harvard’s decision to #divest its $40 plus billion endowment fund from fossil fuels is a precedent-setting event that warrants the attention of decisionmakers globally. Here’s why. 🧵
The complaint continued that the failure of Harvard to divest may be seen as a violation of the law. The issue needed to be vetted using the investigative resources of the @MassAGO. via @thecrimsonthecrimson.com/article/2021/5…
Around the world, we're seeing momentum towards #netzero pick up speed says @MLiebreich. Countries are turning commitments into formal contributions. #IEEFA2021
Are we in a world where countries are meeting their #netzero pledges—or a world in which promises are empty and nothing's being done? We'll look at that question says @MLiebreich. #IEEFA2021