Jst N Anand Venkatesh of #MadrasHighCourt commends Tamil Nadu Govt for being committed towards the cause of #LGBTQIA + community.
"Really happy that the Govt. has come forward to protect this community from harassment by police personnel and others," says Justice.
Records the court's "deep appreciation" to the State Govt for having brought out a glossary to address persons belonging to the #LGBTQIA+ community with dignity in the media and other fora.
Directs the media to henceforth use the words that are referred to in the glossary.
Judge reiterates confidence on the press and media and sincerely hopes that they would use the dignified expressions while addressing #LGBTQIA+ community and follow the court direction in letter and spirit.
Judges says, "the Govt's inclination to amendment the TN Police Service Rules and prescribe punishment for policemen who harass #LGBTQIA+ community people is a milestone and a decisive step which gives hopes to them that they are in safe hands."
Judge hopes that in the future the LGBTQIA+ community would not be facing any harassment by police personnel.
Records that sensitisation programmes are being conducted regularly for policemen and says the DGP & TN police dept deserves appreciation.
Judge agrees with petitioner's counsel @manuraj1983 that TN Govt is the first in the country to use the expression LGBTQIA+, instead of using the term transgender alone, while amending the TN Police Service Rules.
Additional Advocate General tells the court that, "TN Govt has framed a draft transgender policy and circulated it to all stakeholders. It will be finalised soon and placed before the court."
Central Govt senior panel counsel tells the judge that, he is in constant touch with the Centre to ensure that the Garima Greh shelter scheme is not restricted to the transgender alone & extended to the entire #LGBTQIA+ community as suggested by the court during the last hearing.
Judge says NGOs working for the welfare of LGBTQIA+ community must be enlisted and recognised so that there's some accountability.
"Unfortunately, the probability of abuse is more because of perverted minds," the judge adds.
Judge appreciates efforts put in by an expert committee constituted by National Medical Commission to look into concerns expressed by the court on the need to modify the medical curriculum which teaches wrong notions about sexual orientation.
BREAKING: @RashmiDVS approaches Karnataka HC in ongoing #HijabRow case. Inter alia avers “alarmed at purported attempt to introduce symbols widely regarded as tending to promote discrimination & exclusion of women in state-run edu. institutions under garb of Freedom of Religion”
.@RashmiDVS tells Karnataka HC that she herself was once a student of PU College & recalls that she & peers adhered to a strict uniform code which they welcomed as it “fostered sense of sameness & community”, “fulcrum upon which entire student body united” #HijabRowInKarnataka
Despite views expressed by noted scholars & activists such as “Hijab is meant to keep muslim women oppressed” (Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed), “Veil not mandatory in Islam” (Indian muslims for secular democracy) etc, religious chauvinism being pushed: @RashmiDVS to #KarnatakaHC
#SupremeCourt holds condition imposing gender cap on Orchestra Bars in Maharashtra allowing them to keep only four women singers/artists and four male singers/artists on stage to be void.
A bench of Justices KM Joseph and S Ravindra Bhat held that the said restriction directly transgressed Article 15 (1) and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India.
"While the overall limit of performers in any given performance cannot exceed eight, the composition (i.e., all female, majority female or male, or vice versa) can be of any combination", held the bench.
Allahabad HC pushes for a "bio-social approach" while dealing with cases where charges under #POCSO Act get slapped even in matters of teenage affairs.
The court said, "Their decision could be impulsive, immature but certainly not sinful."
High Court was hearing a bail plea of a youth who was facing prosecution for various offences including rape and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act.
The man, who was himself a teenager at that time, had run away with a 14- year-old girl and got married. The couple now has a child too.
Granting bail to the man, the high court observed,
"The scheme of the POCSO Act clearly shows that it did not intend to bring within its scope or limits, the cases of the nature where the adolescents or teenagers involved in the dense romantic affair.”
The Advocate General has completed arguments from perspective of whether the Government has any say in deciding uniforms of PU Colleges. Now, they are rebutting submissions which claimed that Hijab will be an ERP & is a fundamental right. #HijabRow
“The method and manner in which GO is assailed must be taken note of, not challenged earlier,” advocate general adds #HijabRow
Advocate General: Article 25(2) speaks of power of state to restrict or regulate by way of order. Similarly, 19(1) right can be restricted by “law to be made by state”
A #KarnatakaHighCourt bench of Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit & Justice JM Khazi to resume hearing in plea(s) by girl students challenging the alleged ban of wearing #Hijab in government pre-university colleges in Udupi district. #KarnatakaHijabRow
Yesterday, one of the intervenors, Dr. Vinod Kulkarni argued that “banning #Hijab is tantamount to banning Quran” & “that allowing sporting of hijab was paramount for preserving mental health of muslim students during Ramzan & on Fridays” lawbeat.in/top-stories/ba…
The day before, one of the petitioners lawyers drew corollaries between allowing girls to wear Hijabs to school/pre uni colleges as men in turbans are allowed in the army & bindi’s and the crucifix are common symbols in institutions #HijabRow