$QQQ Some musings on a Saturday morning. @kevinmuir piece yesterday about HF continued buying of tech and selling of energy- something i had noted as well in several tweets from GS data made me think what is causing this apparent stupidity. H/t to Kevin for some of these charts
After all everyone knows that rising
Rates are bad for high duration assets. So why the continued doubling down on a losing bet. & even though the charts don’t show it, GS data shows the continued buying of tech & selling of energy ytd.
And then it hit me- we’ve had a generation of managers that have never seen anything but buy the dip & the fed has your back. Long term inflation data although rising are still for now not
Blowing out and so tech investors think a lot of these commodity prices will come down due to lower base effects and viola you will get a fed pivot and tech is then off to the races. Well what i think investors are missing is that inflation even if it comes off, will remain at a
Higher threshold & particularly at the lower income spectrums disposable income has really been squeezed. Think how many stimmy checks went towards IPhones, new streaming service subs etc etc. Well thanks to captalist exploits, i dug up this chart showing palm oil up 200% last
Few Years
Palm oil is used for a lot of processed foods. So we’ve seen bacon px up 28% ytd. Many other groceries up the same & gas prices are nearing $5+ /gallon in places like CA. So do we think people will continue consuming 5 streaming services and upgrading their iPhones every 2
Years or rather spending that $ on feeding their kids. Thus, if im right and even if the fed does become more dovish- something they may be forced to do despite the current hawkishness as the economy is slowing, it wont matter. See the current weakness in tech is 1. Caused by
Rising rates. 2. Recently concern about margin pressure. 3 will be even if rates start falling a concern on top line growth as consumers pull back and reorient their spending towards more Basic goods and less on frivolous tech spending. The tech bros are assuming #1 is
Transitory (and they may be right) but they haven’t figured out that #2 and #3 will crush the valuations. Dont forget in 2000-2002, fed funds rates fell hundreds of basis points and it didnt help nasdaq stop falling over 80%. And oh yeah there were a bunch of financial
Shenanigans like worldcom and Enron that didnt inspire confidence. My bet this cycle will be TSLA and CVNA & the implosion (asset freeze) of $ARKK if i had to make a bet. So thank you Kevin for inspiring me to remember a painful period in the markets!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$GLD $SLV Two years ago close to this day I made a fateful decision to dump all my $gdxj and buy $AR at $1/share. Close colleagues thought i was absolutely loony- sentiment on gold was sky high (similar to where oil sentiment is today fyi) and well sentiment on gas- you could
not find a more reviled asset. That was a life changing trade & even though i exited 1/2 my $ar at 10 & 1/2 at $14; the entries into $btu sub 3, and $5.50 ended up being even better switches. So why the back story-Twitter has made me so much $ from getting a real time sentiment
check on where sentiment is. Well now lets talk about oil; My timeline has everyone calling for $150 oil; don't believe me- look at COT o/s-now I'm not bearish oil- if anyone remembers for 2 years many of my followers have asked me about gold & i said nope-only care about energy
$PDN #uranium I had a quick catch up call with $PDN mgmt today. Some interesting insights. Firstly to address the sale of a directors 23% holding in the company which is what caused the stock to get smashed. In Australia, your tax liability is set based on when you are free to
Sell-given pdn just came out of blackout post results, that px was just recent & given Cliff Lawrence (chairman) did not want undue risk on px fluctuations, he sold to lock in the taxes due. This seems pretty reasonable. For someone who defended $AM mgmt for selling oodles of
Stock at 4.2 and bot boat loads sub $4,i can tell you over reaction for tax related selling can be costly ($AM since those sales has 3x including the generous dividend). In addition, mgmt is looking at expanding the LH resource such that there wont be a cliff in output from 9m to
$PANR $PTHRF. The benefit of the company having raised more $ than expected- as evidenced by the huge outcrop of support in a very oversubscribed deal is that when entering into negotiations to sell the asset a much stronger b/s leaves them in a much better negotiating position
See last line in the paragraph by Jay Chatheam. Mgmt told me that their phones were ringing off the hook from oil companies that were shocked PANR was able to pull of the fund raise. So for all the naysayers who are upset with the additional few % in diln- and are dumping the
Shares today, if your ultimate goal is to sell the asset to the highest bidder (recall the August webinar where Jay Cheatham said this is our last venture & we want to go out with a big win), you need a strong balance sheet so you don’t get pushed around- be it with a farm out
$PANR $PTHRF. This is amazing news. 1. The company raising 50 of the 70$m with a convertible at a 20% premium (around 80p) and is payable at company’s option in either cash or shares. Thus with the 70$M raise the company plans to drill all the zones but most importantly ALKAID
Which will be producing oil - so they can use the cash flow to prepay the convertible loans. Instead of giving 30-50% of the field to a farm out partner- Panr will own 100% less the dilution from this deal - and if they can use alkaid cash flow the dilution will be in the single
Digit %. I’m beyond amazed at the phenomenal financial deal PANR managed to secure. If this is a huge gusher- im glad we own 100% and not some small tiny %. (Note Exxon in Guyana etc ends up owning 20-30% of these massive fields) - we own 100%!!! Time to
These charts from @themarketear show just how much hate there is towards puts, and a strategy called “Texas Hedge” going long calls funded by selling puts (or in HF lingo called risk reversals) has gained in popularity. Problem is this is super super risky.
Here’s the chart showing folks going long calls, shorting puts.
#uranium. I’d encourage everyone to spend the first 15 mins to watch @brandon_munro give a fab update on what’s going on with the SPUT vehicle. Even for someone who watches the sector closely, I couldn’t help get more bullish with couple catalysts that one may have missed.Namely