When it gets this volatile, it's important to zoom out
Let's talk about some variables to consider while investing in EMs for the next decade
👇
- Labor supply growth (demographics)
- Private and public debt levels (room to lever up still?)
- Politics & reforms
- Valuations
The United Nation prospects for working-age population growth in selected EMs are shown below.
Asia (ex-China) plus Mexico and South Africa are looking good under this metric.
Eastern Europe, Russia, China and Brazil less so.
On a private + public debt levels as % of GDP, few countries are still below 150% combined
Mexico: 83%
Indonesia: 85%
Turkey, Russia, Poland and South Africa also below 150%, while China and Brazil already in the 200-300% area
Ok, but not all liabilities are the same.
And assets matter too.
This neat table from Rabobank shows a bunch of interesting indicator: I underlined two metrics for ''liabilities'' (current account deficit and external debt) and one for ''assets'' (# of import months covered by FX reserves).
Have a look!
Putting it all together on the economics side and considering the political stability side too, some attractive EM countries for the long-term seem to be:
- India & Indonesia
- Mexico
Now, a quick look at valuations.
12m forward P/Es:
- India: 25 (2y real yield: -1.0%)
- Indonesia: 16 (2y real yield: 2.5%)
- Mexico: 14 (2y real yield: 1.5%)
Turkish and Russian equities have very low fwd P/Es, already discounting sanctions and/or political instability.
Obviously, when considering long-term growth potential you need to overlay your macro views on big secular shifts like commodities, for instance.
If you think Copper is here to stay, Chile becomes attractive!
Summarizing.
Selected places in Latin America (e.g. Mexico, or ESG commodities producers) and South-East Asia (e.g. Indonesia) in my opinion offer reasonable growth prospects over the next decades at rational entry valuations.
What are the emerging markets you like, and why?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nobody can predict how the Russia/Ukraine story is going to unfold - I don’t have the slightest clue.
But in my career I learnt how to deal with such episodes to skew the odds a bit more my way.
1/5
Ex-ante, this is the typical low probability / high impact event.
In the run up to the outcome of such binary events, people overpay for insurances - the incentive scheme for big real money accounts is to show their bosses “they hedged”, at whatever cost.
2/5
You will hence find most effective hedges to be expensive.
My advice is NOT to move to proxy hedges: this is an expensive lesson I learnt, but when/if liquidity dries up during a major low probability & high impact event, correlations often blow up and goodbye proxy hedge.
3/5
If you don't understand how our monetary system works and the different tiers of money populating our financial system, you'll miss the very foundation of your global macro analysis.
A short and sweet primer on money from Cullen.
2/9
What if I am wrong in my secular bond bullish thesis?
What if this time is REALLY a ''regime change''?
Running a large portfolio, I learnt that coherently challenging your own highest conviction macro thesis is a great exercise to do: tough, but very useful.
Challenge me.
1/7
Since I started managing money professionally, I had to endure at least 3-4 ''this time is different'' episodes: people would argue rates were going higher, big times higher.
2010-2011 QE = money printing
2013 taper tantrum
2018 rates to 5%+
2021-2022 fiscal paradigm change
2/
I stand behind my bond bullish secular trend until facts change.
What facts?
- Declining rates of potential growth: low population growth and ageing society
- Stagnant productivity: capital misallocation & co.