Thread by @WesleyBKress

(1\7) Dan,
There is no accurate or perfect answer to this question. W/ that said let me see if I can help to add perspective. *NFA I would say that Metabonding really allows you to get exposure to early projects that may have a high asymmetrical return. It helps
$eGLD $MEX $LKMEX

https://twitter.com/DanPolidano/status/1497021990515150853

(2\7) to increase the diversity of one’s portfolio as well. If there are projects that end up becoming high quality blue chip projects, this helps to reduce your portfolio risk overall. As of now the LKMEX/EGLD LP Farm has a much higher % return than the Metabonding if I am

(3\7) correct. I believe this may be somewhat of an oversimplification as the % is a function of the level of participation in the specific reward system be it Farms or Metabonding, I believe. I think that one has to take into context this piece of information, as the % of

(4\7) MEX/LKMEX is very highly asymmetrical with a massive need of utility, underpinning all growing volume of trades. It has performed fairly poorly so far because of the correction in markets & $EGLD correcting due that but compounding has helped to off-set this while we

(5\7) wait for listing of it on other exchanges & increase volume of trades. All of this will improve as well with increased usage & adoption. The profile of LKMEX is much lower in my opinion than any other project but if there is a high quality project that you feel will

(6\7) help diversify the risk in your portfolio than I think it’s very wise to do so. Realize that some of these early mover projects on Elrond will thrive because of the nature of where we are in terms of adoption of the Elrond Ecosystem. Again, there are many variable in

(7\7) decision making around these elements. Many of those variables change the context of accuracy depending on one’s own unique situations and context. I hope this helps at least.

#CryptoWithKress #Crypto

$eGLD $MEX $LKMEX