Share this page!

ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Twitter logo
Feb 27 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
#LiesInLeavingNeverland

Two Completely different stories about how the Safechucks’ relationship with Jackson started!

In Leaving Neverland we have Stephanie saying “One day the phone rang and I picked it up: ‘Hi, this is Michael, I’m calling from Australia...." this implies ⤵️ Image
Jackson made contact first and called James out of the blue.

"And that started the relationship"

With Michael still in Australia he sends a crew to film/interview James.

James then goes on to say that a secretary or someone called to invite them to dinner at the ⤵️
Havenhurst house.

This is how Jacksons relationship starts with the Safechucks according to Leaving Neverland!

However, in Safechucks lawsuit he claims after the Pepsi commercial Michael wrote him a letter (dated March 10th 1987) but if you notice the first sentence starts ⤵️ Image
with "Thank you for your letter” which clearly indicates that Jackson was replying to a letter James had previously sent him.

After receiving James's letter the Safechucks were invited to Jacksons Hayvenhurst home and by Thanksgiving Day (Nov 26, 1987) they are already good ⤵️ Image
friends with Jackson.

This is quite a different story to what we see in the film, wouldn't you say?

#LiesInLeavingNeverland

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ

ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MJsFact_Vault

ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Mar 9
☆Thread☆
 
1/
 It is my understanding #DianeDimond was the first to publicly release the 1994 Michael Jackson / Chandler settlement document that she obtained directly from the leaked source.
2/
 During Dimonds CourtTV exclusive (June 15th 2004) she announced to the world Michael Jackson paid $25million to the Chandler family.

Shortly after, a copy of the settlement document made it's way to various media outlets, but the $15,331,250 was mistakenly left unredacted.
3/
In the days following Dimonds “bombshell exclusive” some media outlets simply echoed Dimonds claims that Jackson paid $25million without any verification.

edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/16…

ew.com/article/2004/0…

nypost.com/2004/06/16/jac…
Read 19 tweets
ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Feb 7
☆ The Evolving Memory Of #WadeRobson ☆

In Wade Robsons complaint(s) he said the alleged abuse started on the SECOND night after his sister wanted to sleep upstairs because she supposedly expressed concern about sleeping in a bed with Michael.
Chantal however tells a different story - she said she slept upstairs the FIRST night and downstairs the SECOND night because by then she was more comfortable with
her friendship with Michael.
Joy Robson said in her 2016 deposition that Chantal fell asleep in Michaels bed the second night but went upstairs when she woke up, this contradicts Wade, who said that Chantal suggested they both go upstairs, but he said he didn't want to.

So, did Chantal fall asleep ⤵️
Read 14 tweets
ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Sep 24, 2021
Another one retweeting from behind their block button, like the gormless troll they are!

Here's your reply!

Since you don't understand what I just wrote, let me break it down for you in simple terms, for a simple mind! Image
Michael Jackson purchased an annuity from an annuity broker. Then from there a STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT ANNUITY was set up for the Chandlers. These are most always underwritten by an insurance company. This is typical for MOST personal injury settlements.
You say molestation, but they see it as a personal injury case since the agreement was signed not accepting liability/fault.

If you don’t understand how one works, then please google it, because I don’t have time to continue to educate you.
Read 4 tweets
ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Jan 10, 2021
#MJFam
1/
 Uneducated guiltiers (such as this one) are quick enough to bark "Michael Jackson didn't have lupus) blah blah blah

However......
2/
 Below is Michaels discharge summary from his scalp burn (Pepsi Commercial) accident in 1984.

Under "hospital course" you will see Dr. Hoefflin had a verbal consultation with Dr Klein & it was revealed that Michael had recently been diagnosed with discoid lupus erythematosus
3/
 Prednisone is listed in Michael Jacksons autopsy

documentcloud.org/documents/2517…

Prednisone is a corticosteroid that is used to treat inflammation on the skin for people with Lupus, it is also FDA approved.

This drug was found in the house that Michael died.
Read 4 tweets
ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Nov 30, 2020
Certain uneducated trolls are passing this "facts" screen shot around like its a share bag of Haribo, however its riddled with your usual guiltiers hope & dreams aka utter BS!
1/
 Robson/Safechuck say that they defended him under oath bc they did not yet understood that what MJ allegedly did was wrong or abuse.

Nowhere did they say in LN that MJs lawyers coached them & there is no way anyone could be coached to answer all those questions when MJ ⤵️
2/
 wouldn't/didn't even know what the questions would be.

Which lawyer coached them & how exactly?

Safechuck never claimed that Jackson made him believe that he would go to jail. That is not part of his complaint(s), his declaration or what he said in Leaving Neverland.
Read 21 tweets
ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴊᴀᴄᴋꜱᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ᴠᴀᴜʟᴛ Profile picture
Nov 7, 2020
#MJFam #MJInnocent #LeavingNeverland #LiesOfLeavingNeverland
1/
 Let us address how certain uneducated guiltiers love to claim that Joy Robson stuck to her story regarding her "family" going to the Grand Canyon in order to not perjure herself. ⤵️
2/
 Joy does NOT qualify by law to be charged with perjury, reason being Joy was not a material witness, if she was, then she would have been subpoenaed by the prosecution to insure that she testified ⤵️
3/
 Material witnesses are incredibly important to prosecuting the accused & by law they can legally detain that person to ensure they testify & to try ensure a conviction. So many witnesses lie on the witness stand, it was given the nickname of “testilying” ⤵️
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @MJsFact_Vault has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @MJsFact_Vault!

Read all threads by @MJsFact_Vault

:(