Thread by @JohnEDeaton1

Why hasn’t the judge thrown out the case?

Between tweets, DMs, and emails to my law firm, this question has been asked over 100 times. People ask w/ all the evidence related to conflicts of interests and appearances of improprieties, why hasn’t the judge dismissed the case?

The judge isn’t on Twitter, following this. The judge relies only on evidence she is presented by the PARTIES in the case. Except for a few inferences, Ripple has not offered evidence related to any possible corruption.

In fact, I’m the only one who has offered any evidence on the issue at all. The only reason I was able to submit any of this evidence is b/c the SEC attacked me personally, labeling me a clout seeking Twitter conspiracy theorist. I offered objective facts supporting my criticism.

Had they not attacked me, I wouldn’t have offered any evidence at all. My ability to file anything related to conflicts required strategy. @MoonLamboio @stephenchip & @Jeff_OnTheChain can attest to this strategy b/c I sent them an email predicting the attack before it happened.

We can’t conflate what’s stated on Twitter or YouTube with what the Judges actually review. For ex, emails between Hinman and his law firm that @EMPOWR_us received via FOIA litigation, are not part of the Ripple case. The judge hasn’t been provided any of those emails. 👇

https://twitter.com/jdduran126/status/1499152968301514753

The point I’m trying to make is that people shouldn’t expect the judges to throw out the case based on evidence that isn’t being presented to the judge. I’ve seen criticism of the judges b/c they aren’t doing something they haven’t been asked to do. It just doesn’t work that way.

I realize people are frustrated. I am as well. If you want something done then we have to get the Congressional oversight committees to ask for an investigation. Go to Crypto-Law.us and use the Connect to Congress app. International holders use the International app.