@Belisarius2020
There are 63 emails with a Draft of the Hinman speech. At the same time these emails are going back and forth a memo was being written analyzing w/r #XRP was a security. That memo was finished on June 13, 2018 - the day before Hinman’s speech.
There are 63 emails with a Draft of the Hinman speech. At the same time these emails are going back and forth a memo was being written analyzing w/r #XRP was a security. That memo was finished on June 13, 2018 - the day before Hinman’s speech.
https://twitter.com/moonlamboio/status/1499781391080464392
Therefore, the people who responded to the Draft Speech wouldn’t have read the #XRP memo. #XRP was battling #ETH for the number 2 spot for years. What is the likelihood that at least one person in the chain asked:
“What about XRP? Or Wouldn’t today’s XRP also not be a security?”
“What about XRP? Or Wouldn’t today’s XRP also not be a security?”
Here’s more food for thought. We also know that the Estabrook notes from the Roisman and @bgarlinghouse meeting favors @Ripple and Brad. We know that b/c the SEC turned over the notes from the Clayton / Hinman meeting and didn’t claim privilege. The SEC is clearly cherry picking.
One more thing: We know Clayton was the ONLY Commissioner to review the speech before it was given and who provided input. Hinman did not email the speech to Roisman or @HesterPeirce. Why not? B/c he likely knew that Roisman and Hester might speak up about #XRP or other tokens.
I’m very confident that these emails and the Estabrook notes 📝 are HUGE pieces of evidence that will drive either a settlement or an ultimate victory. We just need the ruling to come down as it should.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
