#EFT #CoalTwitter #OOTT

People are making the case that Russian #Oil and #Coal are fungible, and will make their way into global supply via eastern markets or huge discounts no matter where the war in Ukraine heads.

They will, but that’s missing the point.

Thread Time 1/n⬇️
First, a lot of those barrels and tons don’t have easy 1:1 alternative markets. For instance, Europe’s thermal plants and steel mills are tailored to Russian Kuzbass, Donets, Pechora coals - buyers can adjust mixes to an extent, but…

2/n ⬇️
that means pulling coal for a comparable blend from elsewhere on the seaborne market - not exactly easy, or cheap. Meanwhile, logistical shakeups like this make supply side shocks a lot more disruptive; see Queensland and NSW this year. Prices go ⬆️

3/n ⬇️
On the liquids side, Europe takes over 50% of Russia’s crude exports; China another 20%.

The ESPO already runs near max capacity; If Europe tries to wean off Urals, how much more tanker volume can the East handle? How much more do their refineries even want? 4/n ⬇️
Second, and more importantly; the economic damage the West just dealt Russia is unprecedented. Big boy banks are already guessing at the GDP drawdown ranging from 7-12% - the USSR’s collapse saw it drop 10%

For context, Russian crude production dropped 40% from ’88 to ’94. 5/n⬇️
What do you think Russian production capacity looks like 2, 3, even 5 years from now?

Venezuelan oil saved us last time - who steps in this go around?

6/n⬇️
Petro and Coal reserves don’t just develop themselves.

They require large capital outlays and experienced persons interested in sticking around to see them through over over the span of years.

7/n⬇️
Maduro didn’t kill PDVSA in a day, he killed it over half a decade by starving it of capital and scaring away the folks who knew what they were doing - that’s what’s at risk of happening in Russia.

8/n⬇️
The impact of this globally obviously gets insulated by whatever demand destruction occurs domestically in Russia (bleak, I know).

Oil rich nations typically have lower income elasticities for liquids relative to the global average, and Russia is no exception.

9/n⬇️
Russia consumes ~1/3rd of the oil they produce. If their production halves, and domestic demand only drops ~8%, where is that export gap made up?

similar vein: electricity demand is extremely inelastic in the short run, & Russia consumes over 50% of the coal they mine

10/n⬇️
What happens to their coal export capacity ~5 years from now if they fail to inject adequate capital into mine development?

In a world that won't lend capital to fossils, but can't scale nuclear quickly enough, you have to ask:

Where does that difference get made up?

11/n⬇️
Long story short:

Nowhere on this planet is going to be happy about any sustained shocks to Russian fossils export capacity, and that’s probably exactly what’s coming.

Recession risks are mounting, and energy might be the only safe haven you can expect

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Resources Roach

Resources Roach Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Roach_Resources

Feb 15
Thoughts on $ARCH earnings:

Already basically net cash, expects ARO 80% paid down this year.

Capital Returns Plan is to split discretionary FCF (ex Capex & ARO funding) 50/50 between:

1) Quarterly div

2) buybacks/spec divs/ dealing with convertible in some fashion.

⬇️ 1/N
- Say CapEx comes in around ~$130m for the year, contribution to Mine Retirement fund @ $100m...

not unreasonable at all to guess at ~$300m in returns coming to shareholders through Q2-Q4

2/N ⬇️
Met shipped 10% more volume than I would have thought, but costs were higher than expected (~$85/ton) and sales prices lower ($206/ton for coking). Would love clarity on what their seaborne realizations are relative to the USEC prints for HVA/HVB/LV...

3/N ⬇️
Read 6 tweets
Jan 26
$ARCH $AMR $HCC $METC #CoalTwitter


Here's a stupid 🧵 on Met Coal:

Ordinarily, steel px leads coking coal indexes, and I’d run as far as I could from the ferrous supply chain while HRC/EHR fall of a cliff (which they are).

However… 1/n
FOB AUS coking coal is trading above $430/tn (ATH’s) in the middle of china’s seasonal crude steel slump. 2/n
This is pure, unadulterated pirate booty for Met producers with the opportunity to sell into the seaborne market.

Now, I’m an idiot, and truly don’t know why seaborne met is so high right now, but it probably has something to do with this chart:
3/n
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(