The risk of nuclear war is greater than at any time since 1945. Not even the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 - which, it should be recalled, was triggered by Kennedy's refusal to allow Soviet missiles in the Western Hemisphere - posed as great a danger. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar#NATO
Sixty years ago, even in the midst of a major confrontation, both the US and Soviet governments were seeking to negotiate a way out of the crisis and avoid war. Not so today: both US/NATO and the Putin government are acting with a staggering level of recklessness. 2/
Having been backed into a corner by the relentless expansion of NATO, Putin's desperate invasion has played into the hands of US and European imperialism. US strategists often boasted about plans to turn Ukraine into "Russia's Afghanistan." 3/
But the logic of military escalation, combined with hysterical anti-Russia propaganda, threatens to turn the rapidly developing war between US/NATO and Russia into civilization's graveyard. 4/
Utilizing their vast propaganda resources, the US and European media have incited a frenzy within substantial sections of the affluent middle class. The protests that have developed in response to the invasion of Ukraine are anti-Russian, not anti-war. 5/
Genuine anti-war protests do not call for a #NoFlyZoneOverUkraine that could trigger a nuclear confrontation. They do not applaud and call for massive increases in military budgets. They do not forget he war crimes committed by the governments of their own countries. 6/
Opposition to war does not consist in calling for assassinations of the leaders of the "enemy" country, nor with hailing the military exploits of fascistic forces with a long history of genocidal crimes. 7/
An anti-war movement must be built through the mobilization of the working class against not only the Putin government but also the US/NATO alliance, which seeks to utilize this war to advance its global interests. 8/
Read and circulate the statement of the World Socialist Web Site: "Oppose the Putin government’s invasion of Ukraine and US-NATO warmongering! For the unity of Russian and Ukrainian workers!" 9/9 wsws.org/en/articles/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Russian comrade, who firmly opposes the invasion of Ukraine, describes the mood within Russia as deeply conflicted. There is widespread sentiment that nothing positive can come out of the #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
But many people believe that NATO forced Putin into a corner, with the aim of provoking a war that will create conditions for regime change in Moscow and the break up of Russia. 2/
The Kremlin is trying to appeal to the population by arousing nationalist and chauvinist sentiments. But the success of these efforts is limited. Only to the extent that it is seen as a defensive action is the war supported. 3/
On July 23, 1939, Leon Trotsky, exiled in Mexico, met with journalists and gave his appraisal of the international situation. Though confined within the walls of a villa in Coyoacan, Trotsky's grasp of world politics was unequaled. 1/
Speaking in English, Trotsky told the assembled reporters: "The capitalist system is in a state of impasse. From my side, I do not see any normal, legal, peaceful outcome of this impasse. The outcome can only be created by a tremendous historic explosion. 2/
"Historic explosions are of two kinds - wars and revolutions. I believe we will have both." All governments and the established mass parties were being overwhelmed by events. 3/
The April 1949 edition of the "Fourth International" - the theoretical journal of the world Trotskyist movement - published a statement on the founding of the North Atlantic Alliance (which was to become known as NATO). It stated: 1/ marxists.org/history/etol/n…
"Four years after the collapse of Hitler’s 'New Order' a new balance of power is being forged on the old continent. 2/
"At the head of the coalition, for the first time in. modern history, stands a non-European power – American imperialism, chief victor in the recent war, inheritor of the mantle of the British Empire, unrivaled pretender for the role of master of the world." 3/
The war is having a devastating impact on historians. There are entirely principled and leftwing grounds upon which the Russian invasion of #Ukraine should be opposed, and which do not require adapting to the US-NATO coverup of fascism in Ukraine's past and present. 1/
But unfortunately, even historians who have written major works on the fascist Stepan Bandera, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and the UPA (Ukrainian Insurgent Army) are renouncing their own scholarship to suit the needs of the US-NATO propaganda campaign. 2/
The "Statement on Ukraine by scholars of genocide, Nazism and WWII" is a disgraceful example of the intellectual and moral capitulation of significant segments of the academic community to the demands for historical falsification. 3/
The deep-rooted and essential causes of a war are revealed not in how a war begins but, rather, how it develops and to what it leads. The American Civil War was not caused by the firing on Fort Sumter. The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand did not cause World War I. 1/
That the Civil War was ultimately about the destruction of slavery (and the resulting unfettered growth of modern capitalism In the United States) would become clear in historical retrospect. 2/
That the assassination of the Austrian archduke in Sarajevo was little more than a trigger event for the eruption of long simmering inter-imperialist conflicts was apparent in 1914 only to the most farsighted Marxists (especially Lenin, Trotsky and Luxemburg). 3/
In today's climate of amnesia, journalists, historians and other professional framers of middle class public opinion - whose moral compass is set by the #NYTimes - seem to have forgotten the bloody days of "shock and awe," back in March 2003, when the US pulverized Baghdad. 1/
The page 1 article by the Times' reporter began: "In a blaze of heavy bombing, American air power devastated parts of Baghdad tonight, including several government buildings and palaces built by Saddam Hussein, as waves of fresh ground forces swarmed into Iraq from the south." 2/
The report continued: "The air battle was most visible in the capital, but military officials said it was only the beginning of an unfolding campaign that in the first 24 hours was expected to hit 1,500 targets all across Iraq." 3/