David North Profile picture
Mar 7 9 tweets 2 min read
The April 1949 edition of the "Fourth International" - the theoretical journal of the world Trotskyist movement - published a statement on the founding of the North Atlantic Alliance (which was to become known as NATO). It stated: 1/
marxists.org/history/etol/n… Image
"Four years after the collapse of Hitler’s 'New Order' a new balance of power is being forged on the old continent. 2/
"At the head of the coalition, for the first time in. modern history, stands a non-European power – American imperialism, chief victor in the recent war, inheritor of the mantle of the British Empire, unrivaled pretender for the role of master of the world." 3/
The Pact "is not just another military alliance. The coordination of weapons and the unification of the military staffs...under a centralized command cannot be achieved without the regimentation of all economic and political life in harmony with this martial plan." 4/
"In effect," the statement warned, "the political form of this coalition can be nothing else than a world-wide military dictatorship taking its orders from the Brass Hats in Washington." 5/
The Trotskyists were not overawed by the post-World War II reorganization of imperialist militarism under the direction of Washington. They wrote: 6/
"The general staffs have carefully calculated all contingencies and eventualities – all but one. That one is the alliance of the peoples of the world who above all want peace. 7/
"Not the maneuverings of the Kremlin, but the class struggle in Shanghai and Indonesia, in Milan, the Ruhr and Detroit will prove the Achilles heel of this unholy compact of death, reaction and dictatorship." 8/
This farsighted and even prophetic analysis of the implications of NATO's founding is now being fully confirmed. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David North

David North Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidNorthWSWS

Mar 8
A Russian comrade, who firmly opposes the invasion of Ukraine, describes the mood within Russia as deeply conflicted. There is widespread sentiment that nothing positive can come out of the #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
But many people believe that NATO forced Putin into a corner, with the aim of provoking a war that will create conditions for regime change in Moscow and the break up of Russia. 2/
The Kremlin is trying to appeal to the population by arousing nationalist and chauvinist sentiments. But the success of these efforts is limited. Only to the extent that it is seen as a defensive action is the war supported. 3/
Read 15 tweets
Mar 7
On July 23, 1939, Leon Trotsky, exiled in Mexico, met with journalists and gave his appraisal of the international situation. Though confined within the walls of a villa in Coyoacan, Trotsky's grasp of world politics was unequaled. 1/
Speaking in English, Trotsky told the assembled reporters: "The capitalist system is in a state of impasse. From my side, I do not see any normal, legal, peaceful outcome of this impasse. The outcome can only be created by a tremendous historic explosion. 2/
"Historic explosions are of two kinds - wars and revolutions. I believe we will have both." All governments and the established mass parties were being overwhelmed by events. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Mar 6
The risk of nuclear war is greater than at any time since 1945. Not even the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 - which, it should be recalled, was triggered by Kennedy's refusal to allow Soviet missiles in the Western Hemisphere - posed as great a danger. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar #NATO
Sixty years ago, even in the midst of a major confrontation, both the US and Soviet governments were seeking to negotiate a way out of the crisis and avoid war. Not so today: both US/NATO and the Putin government are acting with a staggering level of recklessness. 2/
Having been backed into a corner by the relentless expansion of NATO, Putin's desperate invasion has played into the hands of US and European imperialism. US strategists often boasted about plans to turn Ukraine into "Russia's Afghanistan." 3/
Read 9 tweets
Mar 4
The war is having a devastating impact on historians. There are entirely principled and leftwing grounds upon which the Russian invasion of #Ukraine should be opposed, and which do not require adapting to the US-NATO coverup of fascism in Ukraine's past and present. 1/
But unfortunately, even historians who have written major works on the fascist Stepan Bandera, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and the UPA (Ukrainian Insurgent Army) are renouncing their own scholarship to suit the needs of the US-NATO propaganda campaign. 2/
The "Statement on Ukraine by scholars of genocide, Nazism and WWII" is a disgraceful example of the intellectual and moral capitulation of significant segments of the academic community to the demands for historical falsification. 3/
Read 23 tweets
Mar 3
The deep-rooted and essential causes of a war are revealed not in how a war begins but, rather, how it develops and to what it leads. The American Civil War was not caused by the firing on Fort Sumter. The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand did not cause World War I. 1/
That the Civil War was ultimately about the destruction of slavery (and the resulting unfettered growth of modern capitalism In the United States) would become clear in historical retrospect. 2/
That the assassination of the Austrian archduke in Sarajevo was little more than a trigger event for the eruption of long simmering inter-imperialist conflicts was apparent in 1914 only to the most farsighted Marxists (especially Lenin, Trotsky and Luxemburg). 3/
Read 11 tweets
Mar 2
In today's climate of amnesia, journalists, historians and other professional framers of middle class public opinion - whose moral compass is set by the #NYTimes - seem to have forgotten the bloody days of "shock and awe," back in March 2003, when the US pulverized Baghdad. 1/
The page 1 article by the Times' reporter began: "In a blaze of heavy bombing, American air power devastated parts of Baghdad tonight, including several government buildings and palaces built by Saddam Hussein, as waves of fresh ground forces swarmed into Iraq from the south." 2/
The report continued: "The air battle was most visible in the capital, but military officials said it was only the beginning of an unfolding campaign that in the first 24 hours was expected to hit 1,500 targets all across Iraq." 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(