A Russian comrade, who firmly opposes the invasion of Ukraine, describes the mood within Russia as deeply conflicted. There is widespread sentiment that nothing positive can come out of the #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
But many people believe that NATO forced Putin into a corner, with the aim of provoking a war that will create conditions for regime change in Moscow and the break up of Russia. 2/
The Kremlin is trying to appeal to the population by arousing nationalist and chauvinist sentiments. But the success of these efforts is limited. Only to the extent that it is seen as a defensive action is the war supported. 3/
But even among supporters there is little enthusiasm. The more common sentiment is one of depression. The Kremlin, acting upon behalf of a corrupt oligarchy, is incapable of making a popular appeal to the Russian public, and certainly not to the Ukrainian people. 4/
People realize that Putin has made disastrous miscalculations. Among the broad mass of the working people, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and restoration of capitalism is viewed as a disaster which has led to the present crisis. 5/
But they fear that a NATO victory will have terrible consequences - possibly the fragmentation of Russia and the theft of its raw materials by NATO powers. Most Russians want to see the war ended. But they do not know how this can be achieved without destroying the country. 6/
I asked: "What would be the impact upon Russian workers and leftwing intellectuals of a genuine anti-war movement in the 'West,' which made clear its opposition to US/NATO imperialism, Ukrainian fascists and Putin's corrupt and chauvinistic regime?" 7/
The Russian Trotskyist replied: "Of course, Putin's government would do everything in its power to prevent the Russian workers, intellectuals and student youth from learning of this development. Putin hates socialism and views its adherents as his most dangerous enemies. 8/
"But if a genuine anti-war movement developed in the United States and Europe, it would have a powerful effect on social consciousness in Russia. It is impossible to see a way out of this crisis, stop the violence and avoid disaster without a global perspective. 9/
"News of working people in the United States and Germany opposing NATO's threats against Russia would inspire hope among Russian people, and encourage them to oppose the Kremlin and demand an immediate end to the war. 10/
"Putin draws his strength from pessimism. He is helped by hate-filled denunciations of Russia, which lead people in this country to believe they are isolated in a hostile world dominated by an all-powerful United States. 11/
"But that pessimism would be dispelled by the emergence of an international anti-war movement. Though it is suppressed within the existing post-Soviet environment, there remains among the people a deep feeling that the October Revolution was a great event. 12/
"Putin attacked Lenin when he launched the war. This is not popular among masses of people, who still view Lenin as a great historical figure who fought for the working class and human equality. 13/
"Of course, there remains confusion about the Revolution. But it has not been entirely forgotten that the 1917 Revolution arose out of opposition to Russia's disastrous involvement in World War I. 14/
"So, yes, the emergence of an anti-war movement in the US and Europe would dramatically change the situation in Russia." 15/15
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The US-Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership, signed in Washington on November 10, 2021, provides a critical insight into the background of the #UkraineRussiaWar. It confirmed Ukraine's status as a key US ally in an offensive anti-Russia alliance. 1/ state.gov/u-s-ukraine-ch…
This bellicose statement, signed by Secretary of State Antony Blinken, defined Russia as an enemy, committing the US to support Ukraine "in the face of ongoing Russian aggression, which threatens regional peace and stability and undermines the global rules-based order." 2/
This "strategic partnership" was not only a preparation for war. Secretary of State Blinken understood and actually intended that this document would be read by the Russian government as a direct threat. 3/
This two part interview with Yaneer Bar-Yam should be read carefully. He presents a devastating refutation of the claim that #Covid_19 has become a mild and endemic disease with which society can easily "live with." Here are a few critical excerpts: 1/ wsws.org/en/articles/20…
"We are being told that we must live with the virus because it’s 'endemic,' whatever that means—a term which people are confused by...The narrative is also claiming that it’s going to remain mild. But we know that it’s not mild." 2/
"The business interests that have been driving the government response to the pandemic are trying to obscure the danger...There's no doubt that the governments could and should be tracking #Omicron and its subvariants like BA.2 because we know that it can be more severe." 3/
On July 23, 1939, Leon Trotsky, exiled in Mexico, met with journalists and gave his appraisal of the international situation. Though confined within the walls of a villa in Coyoacan, Trotsky's grasp of world politics was unequaled. 1/
Speaking in English, Trotsky told the assembled reporters: "The capitalist system is in a state of impasse. From my side, I do not see any normal, legal, peaceful outcome of this impasse. The outcome can only be created by a tremendous historic explosion. 2/
"Historic explosions are of two kinds - wars and revolutions. I believe we will have both." All governments and the established mass parties were being overwhelmed by events. 3/
The April 1949 edition of the "Fourth International" - the theoretical journal of the world Trotskyist movement - published a statement on the founding of the North Atlantic Alliance (which was to become known as NATO). It stated: 1/ marxists.org/history/etol/n…
"Four years after the collapse of Hitler’s 'New Order' a new balance of power is being forged on the old continent. 2/
"At the head of the coalition, for the first time in. modern history, stands a non-European power – American imperialism, chief victor in the recent war, inheritor of the mantle of the British Empire, unrivaled pretender for the role of master of the world." 3/
The risk of nuclear war is greater than at any time since 1945. Not even the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 - which, it should be recalled, was triggered by Kennedy's refusal to allow Soviet missiles in the Western Hemisphere - posed as great a danger. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar#NATO
Sixty years ago, even in the midst of a major confrontation, both the US and Soviet governments were seeking to negotiate a way out of the crisis and avoid war. Not so today: both US/NATO and the Putin government are acting with a staggering level of recklessness. 2/
Having been backed into a corner by the relentless expansion of NATO, Putin's desperate invasion has played into the hands of US and European imperialism. US strategists often boasted about plans to turn Ukraine into "Russia's Afghanistan." 3/
The war is having a devastating impact on historians. There are entirely principled and leftwing grounds upon which the Russian invasion of #Ukraine should be opposed, and which do not require adapting to the US-NATO coverup of fascism in Ukraine's past and present. 1/
But unfortunately, even historians who have written major works on the fascist Stepan Bandera, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and the UPA (Ukrainian Insurgent Army) are renouncing their own scholarship to suit the needs of the US-NATO propaganda campaign. 2/
The "Statement on Ukraine by scholars of genocide, Nazism and WWII" is a disgraceful example of the intellectual and moral capitulation of significant segments of the academic community to the demands for historical falsification. 3/