Thread 1/ This is a thread about suspicious amplification and engagement farming on #Ukraine-related hashtags. I highlight a rampant violation of Twitter's Ts & Cs that makes getting valuable info on Ukraine more burdensome #disinformation#UkraineRussiaWar
2/ Firstly the tactic. Many of you will have noticed that a lot of #Ukraine hashtags are dominated by the below types of tweets. Ones that say 'RT for Russia" or "like for Ukraine" - sometimes it's reversed. They have huge engagement levels. #UkraineRussiaWar
3/ I counted around 790 unique tweets, many with likes and RTs in the hundreds and thousands. So total engagement levels in the hundreds of thousands. This explains why many of these tweets appear in the 'top' tweets on #Ukraine hashtags
4/ The below network graph is a network graph of accounts that deploy the 'RT for russia' tactic. I mostly included it to give a sense of scale and also because it looks neat...
5/ Firstly, many of those engaging in the behaviour are also newly created accounts. As we saw before, there appears to be a large number of new or barely active accounts with a lot of engagement. That's suspicious. The below account is a few days old
6/ It also appears to be an account that tweets on Indian politics, and has changed its name to #UkraineRussianWar . It has a total of 3 tweets, and is following no one. Despite only having 3 tweets, and being created in March, one of the tweets has+3k likes. Good fortune? Hmmm
7/ Also, and this is bizarre. A huge proportion of accounts engaged in this activity (RT'ing it mostly) were created in February 2022 - around 1627. The average per month is around 120. Notwithstanding the fact the data is usually skewed to the right and that big events #ukraine
8/ drive people to Twitter, this is quite odd - especially considering they are all engaging in similar behaviour. It's around 8% of the 21000 accounts in the sample.
9/ Starting with the most cynical.
a) Create moral parity between Putin and Zelensky. I.e.; war is just a competition between 2 opponents, like a football game, so don't feel guilt for choosing one side above the other. In other words, muddy waters between aggressor & defender
10 b) Create lots of 'noise' on #Ukraine hashtags with these banal tweets. Allows you to promote hashtags and create a presence on Twitter's 'top tweets'. This can dilute useful and legitimate content (unless you find these tweets useful). Can also 'launder' new fake accounts
11 c) Troll farms using trending topics to grow new accounts
d) Twitter newbies having lolz
Regardless of how you interpret it, it's hashtag spamming and engagement manipulation, which violates Twitter's terms and conditions in quite an obvious way. So why allow it? #ukraine
12/ Some additional notes. Most of the accounts with user-reported location (take with a pinch of salt) state they are in India, Pakistan, Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya. Side note, The @EmbassyofRussia (South Africa) is giving a lot of love to its supporters #ukraine
12/ Some may be pleased to note that #Ukraine usually comes out on top in terms of numbers in these RT for Russia, like for ukraine tweets. But part of me thinks that is expected, and that a healthy RT to Like ratio is what helps them trend. #UkraineRussianWar
13/ So the TL;DR. There is extensive & obvious engagement farming/hashtag spamming on #Ukraine hahstags at a time when ppl need good and accessible information, not noise. This violates Twitter rules
Why do Twitter allow it.
RT for 'Twitter suck', 💓 for 'Twitter don't care'
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ THREAD: On populist gaslighting and the war on truth-tellers 🧵
2/ Something concerning is happening in our information ecosystem: populists aren't just spreading misinfo, they're systematically trying to undermine the very concept of verifiable truth
3/ When fact-checkers or experts present evidence contradicting false claims, they get labeled as "elitist manipulators" or 'censors' - effectively inverting reality
🧵 THREAD: Meta's disturbing new "free speech" announcement is a masterclass in how platforms enable digital harm under the guise of freedom 1/9 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Meta announces it's getting rid of factcheckers & "restrictions" on gender/immigration content. This isn't about free speech - it's about platforming hate & disinformation under the guise of "mainstream discourse" 2/9
Key red flags: ❗️❗️❗️
Moving content teams to Texas "for less bias" (read: political motivation)
Replacing factcheckers with "community notes"
Framing basic content moderation as "censorship" 3/9
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.