Thread 1/ This is a thread about suspicious amplification and engagement farming on #Ukraine-related hashtags. I highlight a rampant violation of Twitter's Ts & Cs that makes getting valuable info on Ukraine more burdensome #disinformation#UkraineRussiaWar
2/ Firstly the tactic. Many of you will have noticed that a lot of #Ukraine hashtags are dominated by the below types of tweets. Ones that say 'RT for Russia" or "like for Ukraine" - sometimes it's reversed. They have huge engagement levels. #UkraineRussiaWar
3/ I counted around 790 unique tweets, many with likes and RTs in the hundreds and thousands. So total engagement levels in the hundreds of thousands. This explains why many of these tweets appear in the 'top' tweets on #Ukraine hashtags
4/ The below network graph is a network graph of accounts that deploy the 'RT for russia' tactic. I mostly included it to give a sense of scale and also because it looks neat...
5/ Firstly, many of those engaging in the behaviour are also newly created accounts. As we saw before, there appears to be a large number of new or barely active accounts with a lot of engagement. That's suspicious. The below account is a few days old
6/ It also appears to be an account that tweets on Indian politics, and has changed its name to #UkraineRussianWar . It has a total of 3 tweets, and is following no one. Despite only having 3 tweets, and being created in March, one of the tweets has+3k likes. Good fortune? Hmmm
7/ Also, and this is bizarre. A huge proportion of accounts engaged in this activity (RT'ing it mostly) were created in February 2022 - around 1627. The average per month is around 120. Notwithstanding the fact the data is usually skewed to the right and that big events #ukraine
8/ drive people to Twitter, this is quite odd - especially considering they are all engaging in similar behaviour. It's around 8% of the 21000 accounts in the sample.
9/ Starting with the most cynical.
a) Create moral parity between Putin and Zelensky. I.e.; war is just a competition between 2 opponents, like a football game, so don't feel guilt for choosing one side above the other. In other words, muddy waters between aggressor & defender
10 b) Create lots of 'noise' on #Ukraine hashtags with these banal tweets. Allows you to promote hashtags and create a presence on Twitter's 'top tweets'. This can dilute useful and legitimate content (unless you find these tweets useful). Can also 'launder' new fake accounts
11 c) Troll farms using trending topics to grow new accounts
d) Twitter newbies having lolz
Regardless of how you interpret it, it's hashtag spamming and engagement manipulation, which violates Twitter's terms and conditions in quite an obvious way. So why allow it? #ukraine
12/ Some additional notes. Most of the accounts with user-reported location (take with a pinch of salt) state they are in India, Pakistan, Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya. Side note, The @EmbassyofRussia (South Africa) is giving a lot of love to its supporters #ukraine
12/ Some may be pleased to note that #Ukraine usually comes out on top in terms of numbers in these RT for Russia, like for ukraine tweets. But part of me thinks that is expected, and that a healthy RT to Like ratio is what helps them trend. #UkraineRussianWar
13/ So the TL;DR. There is extensive & obvious engagement farming/hashtag spamming on #Ukraine hahstags at a time when ppl need good and accessible information, not noise. This violates Twitter rules
Why do Twitter allow it.
RT for 'Twitter suck', 💓 for 'Twitter don't care'
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The earliest public post I could find for that fake quote about Hamas celebrating the Bondi Beach attacks (yes - the same fake quotes shared by @BillAckman @TRobinsonNewEra @EYakoby @WarMonitor3) appears to be @HenMazzig, but he deleted it. The second was an Indian pharmacist...
🧵1/ Quite expected how the Israeli press and Hasbara are trying to convince the world @FranceskAlbs was removed from Georgetown's affiliated faculty due to her antisemitism.
Actually, she was removed because she has been sanctioned by the US government
2/ As Maria Mayda, director of Georgetown University's ISIM said, '“U.S. institutions are prohibited by federal law from affiliating with individuals subject to U.S. sanctions,” she said.
3/ Furthermore, Albanese was sanctioned due to her 'engaging' with the ICC, pursuant to Trump's sanctions on the ICC - not antisemitsm. Antisemitism is mentioned, as is criticism of Israel and 'the west'. But as you can see, this is just ad hominem state.gov/releases/offic…
It's finally here! Remember that weird group of Emirati influencers you keep seeing online. Well I've done a VERY deep dive, & the story is even weirder than you can imagine!
2/ Until late 2024, most people had never heard of this group of Emirati influencers, including the somewhat infamous Rauda AlTenaiji. Then they appeared everywhere: op-eds, podcasts, think tanks, conferences. This piece maps how that visibility was built.
3/ This open source investigation documents a pattern of manufactured influence: coordinated account creation, shared studios, pseudo-news sites, AI-assisted content, and systematic amplification across platforms.
In the past week, hashtags linked to Southern #Yemen have surged on X notably:
القوات الجنوبيه طارده_للارهاب (“Southern forces are expelling terrorism”).
👉TLDR: over 5000 X bots are promoting promoting STC control of southern Yemen
2/ First, context: Saudi Arabia has mobilised up to 20,000 fighters on Yemen’s borders after the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) made significant territorial advances in Hadhramaut and Mahra theguardian.com/world/2025/dec…
3/ The STC is using these gains to push for a return to two states, arguing that an independent South would act as a bulwark against terrorism and protect Red Sea shipping routes. Much of the international community continue to emphasise Yemen’s territorial unity.
On 13/08, a fake quote attributed to Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya circulated on X:
“The countdown to the next massacre has begun. Next time we will slaughter all the Jews"
It was debunked, but Gemini later stated it as fact >
2/ Firstly, this super sus account was the first I could find spreading the rumour on X (7.49 am UK time 13/08). @RonanMark572778 - whoever this 'pilot and physician' is has sent >113k tweets since July 2023. He also has a verified account (rememeber verification = algo boost).
3/ The narrative then was picked up on X by other accounts and influencers, changing ever so slightly. Accounts like @FleurHassanN @thevoicetruth1 (lol) got a lot of engagement and 'legitimised' the rumour.
NOTE: Not one of these accounts is providing a source to the quote.
🧵🚨1/ This verified X account posing as an American doctor has been spreading pro-Israel propaganda, justifying the killing of journalists, and posting predominantly anti–Sudanese Armed Forces content. The account is fake.>
#disinformation #gazagenocide #Sudan
2/ The first clear red flags are the tweets versus creation date ratio.
The account was created in 2009, but has only tweeted 1090 times, and the first of those was on April 2025. This means the account has been appropriated/hacked/bought and its old tweets scrubbed.
3/ I located the unique user id of the account. I ran this user id via the botometer archive of bots and it tells me that in February 2023 the account was called 'sitaramks', not 'nate_jone'