Marc Owen Jones Profile picture
Mar 8, 2022 14 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Thread 1/ This is a thread about suspicious amplification and engagement farming on #Ukraine-related hashtags. I highlight a rampant violation of Twitter's Ts & Cs that makes getting valuable info on Ukraine more burdensome #disinformation #UkraineRussiaWar
2/ Firstly the tactic. Many of you will have noticed that a lot of #Ukraine hashtags are dominated by the below types of tweets. Ones that say 'RT for Russia" or "like for Ukraine" - sometimes it's reversed. They have huge engagement levels.
#UkraineRussiaWar
3/ I counted around 790 unique tweets, many with likes and RTs in the hundreds and thousands. So total engagement levels in the hundreds of thousands. This explains why many of these tweets appear in the 'top' tweets on #Ukraine hashtags
4/ The below network graph is a network graph of accounts that deploy the 'RT for russia' tactic. I mostly included it to give a sense of scale and also because it looks neat...

However some important things to note...

#Ukraine️
#disinformation
5/ Firstly, many of those engaging in the behaviour are also newly created accounts. As we saw before, there appears to be a large number of new or barely active accounts with a lot of engagement. That's suspicious. The below account is a few days old
6/ It also appears to be an account that tweets on Indian politics, and has changed its name to #UkraineRussianWar . It has a total of 3 tweets, and is following no one. Despite only having 3 tweets, and being created in March, one of the tweets has+3k likes. Good fortune? Hmmm
7/ Also, and this is bizarre. A huge proportion of accounts engaged in this activity (RT'ing it mostly) were created in February 2022 - around 1627. The average per month is around 120. Notwithstanding the fact the data is usually skewed to the right and that big events #ukraine
8/ drive people to Twitter, this is quite odd - especially considering they are all engaging in similar behaviour. It's around 8% of the 21000 accounts in the sample.

So what's the point?

Well it depends on your levels of cynicism...

#Ukraine️
#disinformation
9/ Starting with the most cynical.
a) Create moral parity between Putin and Zelensky. I.e.; war is just a competition between 2 opponents, like a football game, so don't feel guilt for choosing one side above the other. In other words, muddy waters between aggressor & defender
10 b) Create lots of 'noise' on #Ukraine hashtags with these banal tweets. Allows you to promote hashtags and create a presence on Twitter's 'top tweets'. This can dilute useful and legitimate content (unless you find these tweets useful). Can also 'launder' new fake accounts
11 c) Troll farms using trending topics to grow new accounts
d) Twitter newbies having lolz
Regardless of how you interpret it, it's hashtag spamming and engagement manipulation, which violates Twitter's terms and conditions in quite an obvious way. So why allow it?
#ukraine
12/ Some additional notes. Most of the accounts with user-reported location (take with a pinch of salt) state they are in India, Pakistan, Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya. Side note, The @EmbassyofRussia (South Africa) is giving a lot of love to its supporters #ukraine
12/ Some may be pleased to note that #Ukraine usually comes out on top in terms of numbers in these RT for Russia, like for ukraine tweets. But part of me thinks that is expected, and that a healthy RT to Like ratio is what helps them trend.
#UkraineRussianWar
13/ So the TL;DR. There is extensive & obvious engagement farming/hashtag spamming on #Ukraine hahstags at a time when ppl need good and accessible information, not noise. This violates Twitter rules

Why do Twitter allow it.

RT for 'Twitter suck', 💓 for 'Twitter don't care'

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

Dec 21
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation Image
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist Image
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period). Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 20
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both). Image
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on Image
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
Read 4 tweets
Nov 14
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right

Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
Read 6 tweets
Nov 9
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below Image
Image
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift! Image
Image
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 8
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed. Image
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people. Image
Image
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism. Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 8
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.

Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants. Image
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans. Image
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(