On #InternationalWomensDay2022 I want to highlight that there is still a very real gender-based disparity in STEM by looking at the facts. These issues need to be addressed if we are to ever equity...a thread 🧵
Women in STEM are:
Cited less (papers cited 5.6 times on average compared men at 7.2) and whilst the difference may be small, long term cumulative effects of this have huge impact through the promotions process. rsc.org/globalassets/0…
Harassed more. Nearly 50% of women in science, 58% of women in academia and 43% of female STEM graduates report experiencing harassong behaviours. nap.edu/catalog/24994/…
Paid less. Depending on country as the the %, one thing that is consistent is a pervasive gender pay gap. [In the UK] "The average female scientist or engineer now earns £35,600, while the average for men is £45,800 – a 22 per cent difference." jobs.newscientist.com/en-gb/article/…
Told it's simply a confidence issue (even by other women). We are still being told that the gaps that exist are a problem with *us* not the environment/patriarchy we find ourselves in. We are told to lean in and change. pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn… #SmashThePatriachy
Not represented at undergraduate level. "The proportion of female first degree entrants has risen by only four percentage points
in 10 years...at the current rate of progress it will never reach gender parity.
Less likely to have the opportunity to speak at conferences. 93% of invited abstracts and 83% oral presentations are allocated to more senior career stages where there are fewer women due to the leaky pipeline & the historical barriers women have faced.
Underrepresented. "Women’s representation among tenured faculty is lower than one would expect based on the
supply of female science and engineering doctoral degree recipients in recent decades."
This isn't even an extensive list. All of these (and more) need considering holistically and addressing to move towards equity for women in STEM. Nevermind #BreakTheBias for one day only, we need clear strategies and actions from our institutions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some accessibility tips for Twitter I've learned over the last few years that are simple to integrate into Twitter use and can make your content accessible for a wider audience. If we are to be allies this is something to think about. A thread ✍️
Put alt text on your images. This can be enabled in Twitter settings and involves writing a descriptive sentence about the image you have tweeted. Without this, the image you post is not accessible to visually impaired Twitter users. @AltTxtReminder is a good tool to remind you.
Capitalise individual words in hashtags (called Camel Case). For example #AcademicMentalHealth. This is important for screenreaders as it will then read every individual word in the hashtag rather than a muddle of blended words.
The thing with academia is I can sit here and tell you to set boundaries. To not work weekends for your mental health, because you shouldn't have to, but the culture of overwork means that if you take a step back and look after yourself, or take time to be with your family 1/
or simply, want to enjoy your life outside of the academy, I cannot guarantee you will be "successful" in academia. Because from where I sit, to be successful means to give everything. Your weekends, your health. You are meant to show up and deliver classes during a 2/
pandemic "for the love of it", with disregard for your life because you have no choice. And after all that your dedication and sacrifice might still mean nothing because of the the fact it's not a meritocracy. 3/
The Ghost 👻 - Never available. You have much less contact time than you need, but you get gaslit due to statements like "a good PhD candidate just gets on with stuff". Really you just aren't getting enough guidance.
The Paper Mill 📃- Sees you as nothing more than a way to bolster their tenure bid, and pushes you to the brink to produce papers, pretending that breaking point is for your benefit. Spoiler, it isn't.
So I received this DM today (shared anon with permission, because I think this is something I want to discuss publicly).
Honestly, it doesn't matter of some students "lie" about their mental health, or deaths in the family. We must believe them. 1/
If a student feels the need to lie like this they ARE struggling. Maybe they are working 3 jobs to make ends meet and can't hit deadlines, maybe they are neurodiverse and struggling, maybe their mental health is impacted but from our perspective we just can't see it. 2/
Perhaps more students coming forward and disclosing mental health concerns is because they've always been there but are only now getting the confidence to speak out about it. /3
The "my academic picture was taken in the 90s" academic.
You go to meet them, you've looked up what they look like, you realise their photo on the university website hasn't been updated in 200 years. They know their stuff, and are a solid 7/10.
The "Definitely got your back, what a Belle" academic.
Great mentor, always got your best interests at heart. Probably knee deep in diversity and inclusion initiatives and not getting enough credit for it. Alway makes you go back and read the literature. 11/10.
How can universities support graduate/PhD mental health? Here's some thoughts on what institutions can work towards today 👇#AcademicMentalHealth#AcademicChatter
1 - Acknowledge that the research culture plays a role 🏛️
The onus to improve mental health isn't just on the individual. It's time to acknowledge that the stressors at university impact grad students.
2 - Train PIs 🧑🏫
Promoted to positions of power based on research capabilities PIs often haven't been trained in mental health, like even for 2 hours. Providing basic training can help.