2. It means that any carrots the US puts forward in the talks are devalued precisely because we are explicit about their lack of durability.
So the US has to offer more to achieve the same because of this lack of trustworthiness.
>>
3. As I have written elsewhere, this has been a major challenge in the nuclear talks. Being unreliable does not put you in a good position to ask for a "longer and stronger" deal... >>
4. At the same time, Pence is not lying. If the GOP wins in 2024, I see only two scenarios.
Either the US walks out of the deal a la Trump.
Or it adopts an ambiguous position in which it doesn't commit to staying and flirts with leaving.
In both cases, the JCPOA dies >>
5. In the latter case, the US injects so much uncertainty into the situation that international businesses will begin exiting the Iranian market. As such, UNCERTAINTY IS A DE FACTO SANCTION.
With Iran not getting what it has been promised, Tehran will likely quit the deal or >>
6... it will reduce its obligations, as it did from 2019 and onward. But this time around, the JCPOA would likely not be able to take that pressure without collapsing.
>>
7. Many in DC still think of how to "strengthen" the deal once it is revived.
But I fear very few have internalized how weak the Western bargaining position is: One can't ask for more when one simultaneously admits that no American promise can be kept longer than 4 years... //
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵
The audacity of Saudi and UAE to publicly HUMILIATE America this way is stunning!
If you ever wanted evidence that the US's relationship with Saudi & UAE is designed to serve THEM and not the US, this is it. #UkraineRussianWar
>> wsj.com/articles/saudi…
2. After all the (erroneous) support the US has given Saudi as it bombs Yemen to pieces, KSA & UAE still refuse to stand with the US on Russia.
They do so because they CAN. Because there's never been a cost for them to undermine the US. >>
3. It is important to understand that this is NOT their fault.
This is OUR fault.
We allowed this relationship to become this one-sided.
And instead of being tough on Saudi, as Biden promised he would, he has shifted towards appeasement in the last few months. >>
2. It is quite stunning to see how the WSJ in its reporting - let alone its opinion section - pushes for American global military domination by creating a narrative that other countries are expansionist.
Consider the numbers.>>
3. US has more than 750 (!) military bases worldwide. China has 2.
Yet, according to the WSJ, it is China that pursues an aggressive "expansionist" policy by seeking a base (unclear whether it is military) in West Africa - which WSJ goes on the declare America's "home turf.">>
Biden should bring home ALL US troops in Iraq, @AdamNoahWho and I argue in the @nytopinion today. They don't serve a purpose - they don't deter Iran nor are they needed to fight ISIS.
M. Biden should announce a phased troop withdrawal asap.
If he doesn’t, attacks on U.S. troops will inevitably increase and increase the risk of the United States getting dragged into a larger conflict in the Middle East. And for what? >>
The US does not have the answer for Iraq’s woes. It cant allay the frustration of Iraqis over an unresponsive government and political violence; it is ill-equipped to mediate between Iraq’s competing factions or untangle the web of crisscrossing interests that stymies progress.>>
🧵Wow! A very telling interview with head of Israel's Iran directorate from April. It gives important clues as to why, 6 mo's later, the nuclear talks are stuck...
He says Biden listens to the Bibi gov, evidenced by the US "NOT RUSHING TO A NEW DEAL"
2. This is important as Biden wasted several weeks before starting #IranDeal talks. Those weeks were partly spent on consulting w/ Israel, which apparently advised Biden not to "rush to a deal." Biden obliged by wasting time.
Today, Biden says "time is running out" for talks >>
3. Once again, the US chose to listen to the advice of a state and its leader (Netanyahu) who clearly had shown their preference for diplomacy to fail. (This doesn't take any blame away from the Raisi gov's conduct, but Biden had a major opportunity with Rouhani that he blew) >>
🧵
Important piece on US-Israeli tensions re Iran talks. It fails to point out a key conclusion tho: Biden’s immense efforts to appease Israel in hope of tempering its opposition to the JCPOA has not only failed but was likely a mistake from the outset >>
2. Diverging Israeli and American views on the JCPOA is nothing new - on the contrary. But senior officials in the Biden team thought Obama could have handled the Israelis better through closer coordination and by taking some of their hawkish advice. >>
3. The fundamental question was: Are Israel and America’s views on a negotiated settlement with Iran irreconcilable, or is there a way to clinch a lasting deal with Iran that also makes Israel happy? >>
🧵Important piece by @shira_rubin highlighting crucial developments in Israel where top officials are publicly admitting that leaving the JCPOA was a strategic mistake. This vindicates many of us who warned that it would end up badly for Israel itself >> washingtonpost.com/world/middle_e…
Still, the piece undersells Israel's own role in Trump's disastrous JCPOA exit. Israel didn't just merely "applaud" Trump's decision. It endlessly pushed for it, with Netanyahu even taking credit for convincing Trump to do it.
>>
Former Mossad Head Tamir Pardo has described it as "unforgivable" and "a strategic mistake."
If it was a strategic mistake for Israel, it was also a strategic mistake for the US.
So Israel pushed the US to commit an act that significantly undermined US national security.