🧵Important piece by @shira_rubin highlighting crucial developments in Israel where top officials are publicly admitting that leaving the JCPOA was a strategic mistake. This vindicates many of us who warned that it would end up badly for Israel itself >>
washingtonpost.com/world/middle_e…
Still, the piece undersells Israel's own role in Trump's disastrous JCPOA exit. Israel didn't just merely "applaud" Trump's decision. It endlessly pushed for it, with Netanyahu even taking credit for convincing Trump to do it.

>>
Former Mossad Head Tamir Pardo has described it as "unforgivable" and "a strategic mistake."

If it was a strategic mistake for Israel, it was also a strategic mistake for the US.

So Israel pushed the US to commit an act that significantly undermined US national security.
There should be consequences for this. For starters, the media should repeatedly inform readers whenever Israeli officials are quoted that Israel partly brought about - by its own admission - the crisis we currently are in.
Moreover, DC groups who pushed for the exit should no longer get a pass. They're often quoted blaming the crisis on Biden, without the media raising their own role in creating this mess.

They are presented as innocent bystanders whereas, in reality, they are culprits.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trita Parsi

Trita Parsi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tparsi

12 Dec
🧵
Important piece on US-Israeli tensions re Iran talks. It fails to point out a key conclusion tho: Biden’s immense efforts to appease Israel in hope of tempering its opposition to the JCPOA has not only failed but was likely a mistake from the outset >>

nytimes.com/2021/12/10/us/…
2. Diverging Israeli and American views on the JCPOA is nothing new - on the contrary. But senior officials in the Biden team thought Obama could have handled the Israelis better through closer coordination and by taking some of their hawkish advice. >>
3. The fundamental question was: Are Israel and America’s views on a negotiated settlement with Iran irreconcilable, or is there a way to clinch a lasting deal with Iran that also makes Israel happy? >>
Read 26 tweets
2 Dec
Belatedly, Tom Friedman has recognized the strategic insanity of Israel pushing Trump to quit the #IranDeal. Better late than never!

Yet, his piece is very important as it highlights two issues that the US media largely has neglected. >>

nytimes.com/2021/11/30/opi…
2. First, Friedman points out that Biden made a huge mistake not simply returning to the JCPOA back in January, instead of negotiating its return (which so far has been a fruitless process). >>
3. Secondly, very little coverage has been given in US media that a large number of Israeli officials have now publicly admitted that pressing the US to exit the JCPOA was a mistake. What Israel did profoundly damaged American AND Israeli security. >>
Read 7 tweets
7 Nov
Stunning admission by Nikki Haley:

"You [Biden] have sent Saudi into the arms of Iran. The idea that they’re actually having conversations was unthinkable a couple of years ago.”

🧵Let's unpack this >>
jewishinsider.com/2021/11/graham…
Thanks to the US withdrawing militarily from the MidEast, regional states such as Iran and Saudi have begun exploring their own diplomacy. The neocons had warned that if the US pulled back, chaos would ensue. Instead we're seeing regional diplomacy.

But here's the thing...>>
Haley's comments suggest the neocons knew this all along. They knew diplomacy would break out, not chaos, and that the US was not needed in the region.

Yet that's what they were against all along: Stability in the Middle East and regional powers finding ways to get along >>
Read 5 tweets
21 Oct
So I have a piece out with new revelations on why the Iran talks are stalling. It’s controversial because it shows that the picture painted thus far- the hold-up is cuz Iran is uninterested or feels immune to US sanctions-is incomplete, to say the least >>
responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/10/20/rev…
The key problem from the Iranian side has been the unreliability of US sanctions relief. What good is it if the US exits the deal under the next GOP President? Every time Iran goes in and out of the deal, Iran’s economy is massively destabilized. >>
But here’s the thing: Iran first wanted guarantees that the next US Prez wouldnt quit the JCPOA. Biden said no. Iran shifted then & only sought a guarantee that Biden HIMSELF wouldnt reimpose sanctions.

Shockingly, Biden rejected that as well, diplomats in Iran & EU told me. >>
Read 12 tweets
19 Sep
🧵:

Fascinating story by @nytimes, but there are systemic flaws in its coverage of Israel/Iran. Don’t know Ronen Bergman, but @farnazfassihi is an outstanding reporter. Still, the systemic whitewashing of Israeli actions & motives is very troublesome.>>

nytimes.com/2021/09/18/wor…
2. No less than 3 times (!) does it cite Israel’s justification for its assassinations at face value: It’s solely to stop Iran’s (non-existent) “nuclear weapons program.” No mention that US intelligence assesses that Iran has NOT had an active weapons program since 2003. >>
3. All 3 cases are unjustifiably deferential to Israel's official line with not even an ounce of scrutiny of the statements of a gov the Times itself has reported seeks to start a war.

This type of deference is sadly how the @nytimes helped sell the Iraq war.>>
Read 12 tweets
17 Sep
Blinken famously said in Jan that "the world doesn’t organize itself." It was a staunch endorsement of American domination, lest chaos or a negative counter-order would emerge.

But is is Blinken right? Not quite. A short thread: >>

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
Contrary to Blinken's prediction, we're increasingly seeing that when the US steps back militarily, others step forward diplomatically.

The US is not the only country that can organize the world, nor is it necessarily bad for the US when regional actors take on this role.>>
Beijing, Moscow, Tehran & Islamabad are trying to figure out how to curtail AlQaeda and ISIS in Afghanistan and help bring stability to the country. They are in the neighborhood, they pay the price for instability, they should shoulder this. That is actually GOOD for the US.>>
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(