Thread: Conflicts are one of the main drivers of child trafficking. For years the UK government has conflated "trafficking", which can lead to long-term exploitation and "smuggling", which is predominantly transactional. 1/ bbc.co.uk/news/world-eur…
If the Government rejects amendments made by the House of Lords, the #nationalityandbordersbill will make it harder for trafficking survivors to come forward, by placing time limits on how long they have to present evidence and reveal the level of trauma they've been through. 2/
As the #Ukraine️ war continues we will see the tragic and inevitable rise of trafficking in the area, particularly with children. As it stands the UK government's proposed legislation would see them risk being treated as adults, disbelieved, and criminalised. 3/
The failure of the government to waive visas and ensure refugees can reach the UK safely risks forcing people to use smugglers. The deliberate attempt to deny survivors the ability to seek help WILL, however, embolden traffickers who prey on and exploit the most vulnerable. 4/
As reports saying that "every eighth child in Moldova is a refugee" highlight the scale of the situation, it is essential authorities watch out for signs of trafficking, do not conflate it with smuggling, and do absolutely everything to protect and believe survivors. 5/ #r4today
I highly recommend following my awesome colleagues at @Love146UK for more information about child trafficking, causes and what can be done to help tackle it, by the way. They work on the ground with survivors. 6/
An improvement, but the plan is still only a three year visa. People still need the right to seek asylum and be provided with long-term assistance. Not to mention, among other things, the real risks of exploitation which the sponsorship scheme opens up.
And this is a perfect example of why what is needed is for visas to be waived, not for a new visa scheme to be put. Home Office bureaucracy has been destroying people's lives for decades. Something tells me that increasing it isn't the way forward.
We have seen now schemes such as the seasonal workers scheme, you all remember, that was the one immigration minister Kevin Foster said Ukrainian refugees could use, have led to worker exploitation. This scheme risks being even worse.
THREAD: One of the main arguments which the UK uses for avoiding taking refugees is that they can seek asylum in "safe countries" before they arrive in Britain. That fact that "first safe country" doesn't actually exist in law is irrelevant. 1/
That is why it is so important not only to highlight the failures of the UK to provide protection, but also the risks posed to many asylum seekers in other countries, such as France and across the EU. 2/ hrw.org/world-report/2…
The EU's response to Ukrainian refugees has been astounding, and a direct contrast to the utter shambles which has been the UK's, but this really does highlight the unequal treatment of refugees within the EU as much as anything else. 3/
Thread: Refugees don't need visas. Under international refugee law they cannot be penalised for their manner of entry, which is just one way in which the government's proposals for #NationalityAndBordersBill would violate international law. It isn't so simple though. 1/ #r4today
You know all those stories you see about "small boat crossings"? The politicians and pundits who claim that anyone crossing the channel is an "economic migrant"? Yeah, now you see with the failure of the UK to support those fleeing the #UkraineRussianWar why it was never true. 2/
It doesn't matter where someone is fleeing, the basic reasons for trying to reach the UK remain the same, language and family/friendship ties. Most refugees do remain in their regions of origin, not always by choice, but some don't. 3/
Lord's debating age assessments in the #NationalityAndBordersBill, and in an entirely predictable turn of events Lord Green, of Migration Watch, misrepresents data to try and push an amendment which would see anyone who "looks 18+" automatically treated as an adult. 1/
This would obviously mean that inevitably more children would be held in adult facilities and denied their legal rights to protection. It would also increase the number of age disputes, which he uses to justify his argument. 2/
What his use of figures fails to take into account are, the number of those age disputes overturned, that many were conducted using "short assessments, which have been found to be unlawful, and the increase in use of age assessments by Home Office to attempt to deny asylum. 3/
THREAD: There is a persistent narrative that the UK has always had a "welcoming attitude to #refugees". There's a problem with this though, it is a nostalgic myth. In reality there are few differences in the way the UK acts now, and how it did in the past. Little of it good. 1/
It generally seems to be accepted that by the outbreak of World War two the UK had taken approximately 70,000 Jewish refugees, which sounds a lot until you realise that it is estimated that they rejected about half a million. 2/ theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/08…
Overall it's estimated about 80,000 people were offered refuge in UK, including nearly 10,000 through the Kinderstransport. Good huh. Well there were approximately 60 million displaced people, including 12 million Germans, so not brilliant to be honest 3/ gale.com/intl/essays/ra…
Before anyone gets too optimistic about this, Patel plays semantics. Just look at the language for one thing. "Look at", "investigating". That's a far cry from doing anything. "Ten thousand applications" doesn't mean "granted ten thousand visas". #r4today
Aaaand there we have it. The UK is far too focused on denying refugees safety, for example the #NationalityAndBordersBill being pushed through at the moment would criminalise Ukrainian refugees. It was highly unlikely it would genuinely do something to help. 2/ #r4today
It is hardly shocking given Patel's, and the UK government as a whole's, track record that they aren't actually talking about providing support for refugees, and instead are just alluding to one of the already woefully poor routes they have created. 3/