THREAD: One of the main arguments which the UK uses for avoiding taking refugees is that they can seek asylum in "safe countries" before they arrive in Britain. That fact that "first safe country" doesn't actually exist in law is irrelevant. 1/
That is why it is so important not only to highlight the failures of the UK to provide protection, but also the risks posed to many asylum seekers in other countries, such as France and across the EU. 2/
hrw.org/world-report/2…
The EU's response to Ukrainian refugees has been astounding, and a direct contrast to the utter shambles which has been the UK's, but this really does highlight the unequal treatment of refugees within the EU as much as anything else. 3/
Just recently we witnessed asylum seekers being forced back across the Polish/Belarusian border and left to freeze to death due to EU wide polices designed to maintain what is referred to as "Fortress Europe". 4/
theguardian.com/global-develop…
We have previously seen asylum seekers returned to EU funded camps in Libya where they are tortured, sold into slavery or murdered. A practice which was well known about within the EU, and yet people were still sent back. 5/
theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/n…
At least 2,000 people have died as a result of EU countries conducting "pushback" operations to prevent asylum seekers being able to reach safety, operations which are a fundamental violation of international law. 6/
theguardian.com/global-develop…
Even now while the EU is showing compassion and security to many of those feeling the war in Ukraine, racist policies which have become embedded are still on display with the way in which different groups of refugees are treated. 7/
joe.co.uk/news/refugee-c…
None of this diminishes the EU's response towards Ukrainian refugees. It does show that the ability to provide support and safety to refugees in general has always been there though, and just not used. 8/
To ignore that there are serious issues which need addressing in the EU's general, and decades old, approach to refugees just gives fuel to the UK's argument that it doesn't need to take asylum seekers, "because they have come through safe countries." That benefits no-one. 9/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

Mar 13
An improvement, but the plan is still only a three year visa. People still need the right to seek asylum and be provided with long-term assistance. Not to mention, among other things, the real risks of exploitation which the sponsorship scheme opens up.

theguardian.com/world/2022/mar…
And this is a perfect example of why what is needed is for visas to be waived, not for a new visa scheme to be put. Home Office bureaucracy has been destroying people's lives for decades. Something tells me that increasing it isn't the way forward.

theguardian.com/world/2022/mar…
We have seen now schemes such as the seasonal workers scheme, you all remember, that was the one immigration minister Kevin Foster said Ukrainian refugees could use, have led to worker exploitation. This scheme risks being even worse. Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 12
Thread: Conflicts are one of the main drivers of child trafficking. For years the UK government has conflated "trafficking", which can lead to long-term exploitation and "smuggling", which is predominantly transactional. 1/
bbc.co.uk/news/world-eur…
If the Government rejects amendments made by the House of Lords, the #nationalityandbordersbill will make it harder for trafficking survivors to come forward, by placing time limits on how long they have to present evidence and reveal the level of trauma they've been through. 2/
As the #Ukraine️ war continues we will see the tragic and inevitable rise of trafficking in the area, particularly with children. As it stands the UK government's proposed legislation would see them risk being treated as adults, disbelieved, and criminalised. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Mar 9
Thread: Refugees don't need visas. Under international refugee law they cannot be penalised for their manner of entry, which is just one way in which the government's proposals for #NationalityAndBordersBill would violate international law. It isn't so simple though. 1/ #r4today
You know all those stories you see about "small boat crossings"? The politicians and pundits who claim that anyone crossing the channel is an "economic migrant"? Yeah, now you see with the failure of the UK to support those fleeing the #UkraineRussianWar why it was never true. 2/
It doesn't matter where someone is fleeing, the basic reasons for trying to reach the UK remain the same, language and family/friendship ties. Most refugees do remain in their regions of origin, not always by choice, but some don't. 3/
Read 13 tweets
Mar 8
Lord's debating age assessments in the #NationalityAndBordersBill, and in an entirely predictable turn of events Lord Green, of Migration Watch, misrepresents data to try and push an amendment which would see anyone who "looks 18+" automatically treated as an adult. 1/
This would obviously mean that inevitably more children would be held in adult facilities and denied their legal rights to protection. It would also increase the number of age disputes, which he uses to justify his argument. 2/
What his use of figures fails to take into account are, the number of those age disputes overturned, that many were conducted using "short assessments, which have been found to be unlawful, and the increase in use of age assessments by Home Office to attempt to deny asylum. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 7
THREAD: There is a persistent narrative that the UK has always had a "welcoming attitude to #refugees". There's a problem with this though, it is a nostalgic myth. In reality there are few differences in the way the UK acts now, and how it did in the past. Little of it good. 1/
It generally seems to be accepted that by the outbreak of World War two the UK had taken approximately 70,000 Jewish refugees, which sounds a lot until you realise that it is estimated that they rejected about half a million. 2/
theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/08…
Overall it's estimated about 80,000 people were offered refuge in UK, including nearly 10,000 through the Kinderstransport. Good huh. Well there were approximately 60 million displaced people, including 12 million Germans, so not brilliant to be honest 3/
gale.com/intl/essays/ra…
Read 17 tweets
Mar 7
Before anyone gets too optimistic about this, Patel plays semantics. Just look at the language for one thing. "Look at", "investigating". That's a far cry from doing anything. "Ten thousand applications" doesn't mean "granted ten thousand visas". #r4today

thetimes.co.uk/article/48c663…
Aaaand there we have it. The UK is far too focused on denying refugees safety, for example the #NationalityAndBordersBill being pushed through at the moment would criminalise Ukrainian refugees. It was highly unlikely it would genuinely do something to help. 2/ #r4today
It is hardly shocking given Patel's, and the UK government as a whole's, track record that they aren't actually talking about providing support for refugees, and instead are just alluding to one of the already woefully poor routes they have created. 3/

Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(