Anton Barbashin Profile picture
Mar 12 11 tweets 2 min read
An institutionalist explanation for why Putin invaded Ukraine. None of "he is crazy" or "he is rebuilding the Soviet Empire".
Putting it differently how come Kremlin made the worst decision in the past few decades?
1/10
Vladimir Gelman explains why there is no reason to believe Putin wasn't rational about taking this decision. His every decision before invading Ukraine was quite rational if we take into consideration Putin's calculus.
Key explanation for why this decision was
2/10
made is that Russia is a personalist authoritarian state. The stronger the authoritarianism in Russia, the stupider it gets: because it relies on people because of their loyalty and not expertise.
Critical feedback in FP is non-existant within decision-making circles
3/10
There is almost no instructions in FP decision-making, it is almost exclusively the will of the political leadership. Such was the decision to send troops to Czechoslovakia in 1968 or invade Afghanistan in 1979.
4/10
What is the key goal of public administration in Russia now - still the extraction of rent. Good, well prepared decision are limited to "pocket of efficiency", for instance like the Central Bank. Among few other "pockets of efficiency", the professionalism of a few
5/10
create the illusion among key decision-makers that the state is run effectively and bad governance is not that widespread. When in fact, it is. Most of Russia is run very poorly.
6/10
Another key factor is misrepresentation. Putin looked at US withdrawal in Afghanistan and thought, if I push Ukraine hard enough, government in Kyiv will run same way if US is out of the picture. Because in his mind, Ukraine and Afghanistan were run by the same people
7/10
These misconceptions are based on unrealistic retrospective worldview expectations. Russia's "We can do it again" stands in the same line as "Make America Great Again". Other worldviews are considered simply wrong and are not being looked at at all.
8/10
Also, it is highly likely Putin believed he can repeat the success of the past. That this would be like Crimea but just on a larger scale.
The combination of those factors led Putin to believe he can gain by invading Ukraine.
9/10
Facing reality that is far from what Putin expected does not mean he will learn his lessons and change his calculus.
For more details read this new Vladimir Gelman's piece for @RiddleRussia
10/10
ridl.io/en/why-the-kre…
consideration here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anton Barbashin

Anton Barbashin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ABarbashin

Mar 10
Fresh portion of Valdai delusions. But with an interesting twist - "China will need Russia's help soon, we need to stay strong for that". Thread 1/9
In his new "5-minutes of hate" piece Timofei Bordachev welcomes the opportunities that new "iron curtain" brings Russia, comparing 2022 to 1917. Because 1917 allowed to "get social mobility going and created a more just society"...okaaaay 2/9
The "Economic and humanitarian war of the West" -
(yes, Russia is the victim today) will give Russia an opportunity to be a force of its own. Russia is departing from its dependence on West that was harmful and is now open to new horizons 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Mar 8
Based on conversations with people living in Moscow, Sankt-Petersburg and Novosibirsk it would seem that aside from groups 60 and older the majority of people are starting to get the situation.
No, it is not what you might expect. Will try to get a few quotes here 1/8
"This is of course, war. We don't know what the end goal is. But it would seem Putin has departed from reality."
"Most people supported independence for DNR/LNR, what came the next is too much and is scary" 2/8
"Russia is probably doomed, we get it. It will get tremendously worse. But I don't want to spend the next few years in jail."
"Even if Putin "wins", sanctions will stay. We are ruined." 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Mar 7
How will #sanctions hammer Russian economy? Thread based on insightful @maria_shagina piece for @RiddleRussia
"Unwilling to counter Russia’s atrocities in Ukraine with direct military involvement, the West has opted to wage all out financial warfare" 1/8
ridl.io/en/an-unpreced…
First, we should note the unprecedented unity and speed of sanctions introduced. If in previous confrontation cycles it took ages for EU to get sanctions agenda agreed now it is extremely fast. Also, new nations join unified sanctions front - Singapore, Switzerland and Korea 2/8
First tool is the full blocking sanctions for state-owned second-largest bank VTB and a handful of other financial institutions (Sovcombank, Otkritie and Novicombank). US and UK also prohibited any dollar and sterling transactions for Russia's largest Sberbank 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Mar 4
How Russia covered the war in Ukraine from day one to today. The level of "reality fabrication" here is unbelievable and only matched by state's resolve to punish those who protest war. Based on this long-read by @IrisovaOlga for @RiddleRussia
ridl.io/en/the-russian…
Thread 1/9
There are 5 major narratives that have been pushed by Kremlin propaganda since the war began.
1st narrative - "The West provoked Russia"
Operation in Ukraine is presented as a matter of "life and death" for Russian people, state and sovereignty 2/9
For 8 years the US has invested in creating a hostile state out of Ukraine, Biden torpedoed every attempt at diplomacy. Ukraine aims for nuclear arms, US aims to use Ukraine to attack Russia. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Mar 2
Russia foreign policy experts keep at it. Bordachev here claims that Russia’s main mistake was miscalculating Biden’s interest in Europe. Simply speaking they thought he would agree on smth to keep China on the agenda before Europe 1/4
He claims that smart Americans basically dragged EU into a conflict with Russia that EU would be paying for by integrating Ukraine and generally carrying all the losses. While US only gains weight. 2/4
He says Russia has two options now - if Kremlin believes it can scare US straight with Cuban crisis 2.0., it should keep going and raise the stakes; if Moscow believes that Biden is not going to bite, better leave Ukraine bleeding like it is. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Mar 2
For the past decade and a half Russia was preaching first and by most to itself that the so-called #multipolar world is coming. And it’s going to change everything in favour of the non-West. Thread 1/7
It’s basic idea was that more powers across the globe should be involved in decision making (G20) and economic might should convert in political power (India, China) and some power like Russia just have to be centres of power (nukes+legacy) 2/7
Despite repeated attempts there was never an abundance of interest in this concept and it was mostly Russia that kept preaching the coming of this new multipolar order. 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(