First report assessing the recently introduced French “Repairability index.”

🧵
A “tsunami of e-waste”: in 2019 the global amount reached a staggering 53.6 million metric tons - an increase of 58% in less than 10 years, making it the world’s fastest growing waste stream.
Transferring these numbers to the global population would assign 7.3 kilograms to each individual. Yet, in France it reaches 21 kg per capita, indicating that more developed countries are responsible for the lion share of the total amount.
When things break, we don’t fix them: Today, only 30% to 40% of electrical and electronic equipment failures are repaired in France. Outside the warranty period this number even falls to 10%.
Extending the lifespan of electronic equipment in France could avoid up to 2,218 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year related to the repair of smartphones and up to 5,704 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year for TVs.
Trying to do that, France introduced in 2021 the mandatory display of a repairability index for electrical and electronic equipment.
As of January 1, 2021, the index covers 5 pilot product categories
The calculation of the repairability index includes 5 criteria:
The index is displayed in the form of a score from 1 to 10 in a color-coded label
Here is how the repairability scores for laptops look like.
Smartphones are, in general, more reparable than laptops.
The report covers much more.

halteobsolescence.org/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothée Parrique

Timothée Parrique Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @timparrique

Mar 1
The idea of #degrowth made it to the latest IPCC report.

🧵
The term “degrowth” is mentioned 27 times in the 3,675 pages of the full report (12 of these mentions occur in the bibliography). There is no mention of it neither in the 96 pages technical summary nor in the 36 pages summary for policy makers.
The first mention of the term happens in “Chapter 1: Point of Departure and Key Concepts,” in the penultimate section titled “Facilitating Long-Term Transformation," where degrowth is contrasted with ecomodernism on the issue of decoupling.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 18
18 tips to make your company look green (even though it’s not).

🧵
This is based on the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022, which has assessed the climate strategies of 25 major global companies.

newclimate.org/2022/02/07/cor…
The study has identified 18 "bad practices" through which companies make themselves look greener than they actually are. Here are all of them.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 16
Another spectacular empirical study on unequal exchange by @jasonhickel, @C_Dorninger, Hanspeter Wieland, and Intan Suwandi.

🧵
The article is looking for evidence of something called "unequal exchange." (For more: compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…)
Finding: there is a net flow of resources from the global South to the global North. For example, for every unit of labour that the South imports from the North, they have to export on average 13 units to pay for it.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 7
Here is an indispensable piece of work to understand the global dynamics of environmental pressures. Thomas Wiedmann & Manfred Lenzen in @NatureGeosci.

🧵
In a globalised economy, many processes of production scatter through complex, international supply chains. To calculate the footprint of one single country, one must keep track of all the impacts its consumption has abroad.
This article is a review of the empirical literature that has looked at the environmental and social impacts embodied in international trade.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 3
An interesting article by @JPTilsted et al. on the "green" growth of Nordic countries (that is actually not as green as you may have heard).

🧵 Image
The article criticises the concept of "Genuine Green Growth" from @estoknes and @jrockstrom arguing that the growth of Nordic countries is not as genuine and green as it seems. Image
In the Stoknes & Rockström paper, the authors show that the emission patterns of Nordic countries sometime meets the green growth requirement of a yearly 5% improvement in carbon productivity (the straight blue line). Image
Read 11 tweets
Jan 31
One of my favourite papers of 2021: "The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations" by @AndrewLFanning, @DrDanONeill, @jasonhickel, and Nicolas Roux.

🧵
The paper looks at 11 social and 6 environmental indicators for 140 countries between 1992 and 2015. It also models 'business-as-usual' projections up to 2050.
This donut-shaped figure shows which ecological boundaries are transgressed: the 'OVERSHOOT' (the red bits outward), and which social foundations are unreached: the 'SHORTFALL" (the red bits inward).
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(