Why is Putin bombing maternity wards and shelters labeled “CHILDREN”? Why does he order reckless attacks on nuclear plants and major dams? Why are Russian soldiers mining humanitarian corridors?
Other than being the epitome of evil, of course. 1/n
War is the continuation of bargaining by other means. It is an opportunity to convey information to your opponent-information about your capabilities, resolve, and the ability to inflict costs.
One of the two causes of war is private information. Wars occur, because opponents disagree on a peaceful division of some prize. They disagree, because they lack accurate information on each other’s capabilities, resolve, and ability to inflict costs.
Were they able to obtain this information without going to war, they would simply divide the prize in proportion to the true distribution of power plus/minus each party’s cost from war.
The expected costs of war delineate the pre-war bargaining range. E.g, if the distribution of power is 50:50, but side A’s cost of war is 10% of the prize, then A prefers any peaceful deal that gives it at least 40% of the prize to war. A’s expected utility from war is 40=50-10.
When Putin murders newborns, he is sending a credible signal that the costs of fighting him are more than anyone can bear. This is him saying “You may have superior weapons, but the cost I will inflict on you will make you wish you just peacefully handed over the entire prize.”
He is signaling to multiple audiences: to Ukraine (for negotiating power), to his domestic opposition (to prevent mass protests), to the West (for when he issues future ultimatums), and to the rest of what he views as his sphere of influence (to deter anti-government protests).
He is demonstrating that he can inflict costs. The way to stop him is to show that the West can inflict costs that are unbearable to him.
He obviously doesn’t care about human life (including Russians), so NATO needs to get more creative—e.g., seizing assets of his loved ones, a threat to him personally, or his rule.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Putin’s war in Ukraine is NOT just about Ukraine. Remember how it all started? Putin amassed his troops on the Ukrainian border, but what did he do next? He made a list of demands of NATO, not of Ukraine. Here is the list in case you missed that: theguardian.com/world/2021/dec…
The fact that he threatened NATO with an invasion of Ukraine, rather than threatening Ukraine, speaks volumes about his goals and intentions, as well as his view of the current conflict (“conflict” in the broad sense, not just #PutinsWar in Ukraine).
The West, especially @POTUS, has demonstrated a complete lack of the most basic understanding of crisis bargaining, brinkmanship, and deterrence. Here are the Cliff’s notes of Schelling, Fearon, and Powell with an application to #PutinsWar. This is taught in any Intro to IR. 1/n
War is a bargaining failure. The goal of crisis bargaining is to find the bargaining range-the division of pie that ALL parties prefer to fighting. Such a bargaining range always exists: war is costly-it decreases the size of the pie. The pie is always larger before the war start
So why do wars occur? There are two main reasons: private information and commitment problems. (There is really a third—issue indivisibility—it is more of a bargaining strategy than a cause of war, and it is subsumed by the others).
If you’re hoping that the war in Ukraine will lead to a popular revolution in Russia, here is why it won’t. #StopPutin#StandWithUkraine 1/n
I explain this via a comparison to the popular revolution in Ukraine in 2014, which resulted in the ouster of Yanukovich--mass protests started in response to his abrupt withdrawal from negotiating Ukraine’s accession to the EU.
This was the focusing event that helped solve the coordination problem bringing hundreds of thousands of protesters to Maidan in Kyiv on the same day. In the case of Russia, such a focusing event could be some aspect of Putin's war in Ukraine, e.g. use of chemical weapons.
A poll done by Navalny's Anti-Corruption Fund shows that the number of Moscovites who view Russia as the aggressor increased from 29% on Feb 25 to 53% on Mar 3. #StandWithUkraine️#StopPutin
As a researcher, I cannot help but admire the research design. To account for obvious sampling bias, the poll is repeated 4 over a short time period. While the absolute values are still likely biased, you can see the trend.
This question is "what is the impact of sanctions on Russia's economy?" Red denotes "catastrophic." Catastrophic increased 20 percentage points. img.pravda.com/images/doc/5/e…
If you’re hoping that Western sanctions will topple the regime in Russia, here is a thread on why they won’t. 1/n
To bring regime change, sanctions must prevent the leader from distributing rents to the winning coalition, ie elites will remove the leader who is no longer useful to them. Putin’s winning coalition roughly consists of two groups of elites: oligarchs and strongmen. 2/
We all love to hate the oligarchs, yet there is more to know about them than catches the eye. Beyond the gaudy décor, overpriced yachts, and extravagant parties, there are two important factors. 3/