1) Today's must read, by @TaskandPurpose's Andrew Milburn:
"Overconfidence may obscure for the Ukrainians one salient fact about this conflict: Time is not on their side.
2) Milburn notes that the Russians are adapting their tactics: "The Russians are already adapting, and by doing so are narrowing the Ukrainians’ tactical edge."
3) "The one-sided culling of Russian armored columns that characterized the opening days of the war, and kept YouTube subscribers around the world happy, are a thing of the past."
4) "The Russians now lead their formations with electronic attack, drones, lasers and good-old-fashioned reconnaissance by fire. They are using cruise missiles and saboteur teams to target logistics routes, manufacturing plants, and training bases in western Ukraine."
5) "Realizing that the Ukrainians lack thermal sights for their stinger missile launchers, the Russians have switched all air operations to after dark. It may be for this same reason that Russian cruise missile strikes in western and southern Ukraine have also been at nighttime."
6) "The Russians have learned to play to their strengths. While Ukrainian soldiers mock their Russian counterparts, they are deeply respectful of Russian artillery, an asset that the Russians are using more frequently to compensate for their infantry’s deficiencies."
7) “They [the Russians] own the long clock,” a senior Ukrainian officer recently admitted. “We are calculating time not in weeks or days – but in lives.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) The Ministry of Armed Forces highlights 5 areas: Kiev, Kharkiv, Dnipro (the French rightly see this as a strategic point, as I have noted in the past), Mariupol, and Mykolaiv. I will summarize France's analysis of each area.
3) Kiev: The Russians have not completed the encirclement, the Ukrainians flooded the Irpin River to slow the Russians [smart move], and the Ukrainians have retaken the town of Makariv to the west of Kiev [nice win for the Ukrainians].
1) Interesting information on the control of the skies above Ukraine: @nytimes: "While experts have been puzzled by Russia’s failure to gain complete control over the Ukrainian skies, they are certainly dominant ..." nytimes.com/2022/03/19/wor…
2) "... --- Russian surface-to-air missile capabilities can reach anywhere in Ukraine, according to military analysts. Russia is believed to fly some 200 sorties per day while Ukraine flies five to 10."
3) In the first week of the war, it is not clear how many Russian strikes hit their targets, but Piotr Lukasiewicz, an analyst at Polityka Insight, a Warsaw-based research institute, said that they did serious damage to Ukraine’s command and control centers."
1) The situation in Mariupol is grim. From @nytimes: "Street battles broke out in Mariupol ... as Russian troops and allied irregular forces moved into the city ..." nytimes.com/live/2022/03/1…
2) "Residents who fled the city in recent days have described scenes of dead bodies dotting the streets, widespread looting and the suffering endured by thousands who remain trapped without heat or water."
3) "Ukrainian government reported that its forces were outgunned, that attempts to provide air support had failed and that it had “temporarily” lost contact with the city’s officials."
1) Latest map from @nytimes. Accompanying analysis is similar to mine - the east is in danger of being encircled.
2) According to this map, the city of Chernihiv is now completely surrounded. Polohy is again marked as Russian controlled. Status of Izium is unclear, Pentagon said it was Russian controlled but Ukrainians deny this. Either way you can see how the Russians view its importance.
3) Additionally, Russian forces have punched through the defenses at Mariupol and are fighting in the city center. MOUT (military operations on urbanized terrain) is a nasty affair, you cannot set a timetable for how long the fighting will last. nytimes.com/live/2022/03/1…
1) My article at @DailyMailUK on Russia & the war in Ukraine. I've made many of the points in various Twitter threads, but the following part is new. While Russia may win in Ukraine (it may also lose), it has shown that is is not a serious conventional threat to NATO.
2) Quoting from the article. "While the information campaigns have clouded the reality of the situation on the ground, what has also become clear is that Russian military does not pose a conventional threat to NATO."
3) "Smaller, non-NATO members, such as Moldova, are not so lucky."
"Whatever successes the Russian military has had in Ukraine, the operation has exposed serious flaws in its ability to wage war against an adversary with advanced weaponry and sophisticated tactics."
1) @nytimes most recent map illustrates many of the points made in yesterday's thread. However I think it understates Russian advances in the southeast. Polohy and the area around it is under Russian control.
2) Here is yesterday's update. I highlighted the importance of Izium and Dnipro. Add Kryvyi Rih to that list, which the Russians are pushing towards. If the Russians have success in Kryvyi Rih, it will open the back door to Dnipro and Zaporizhzha.
3) The @nytimes map shows how precarious the situation is in the northern part of the east. Russian troops have bypassed Kharkiv and are pushing into Izium, where there is fighting inside the town.