In recent days, the ruble stabilized and then appreciated sharply.
RU govt bond yields have fallen back.
The consensus forecast for Russia GDP growth in 2022 stands at -8% – a sharp contraction, but hardly a collapse.
It's blatantly obvious we have not done enough. 2/7
Indeed, high energy prices mean we are sending HUGE sums of money to Russia.
Estimate for gas alone: 3/7
The debate on energy ban is stuck. This is v bad because:
1. it shows Putin he holds real power over Europe, emboldening him 2. it's delaying the inevitable and increasing the vulnerability to Putin's blackmail 3. it raises the overall expected costs of containment for EU 4/7
To move things forward we propose a preannounced embargo schedule, implemented over a period of, say, six weeks, e.g.
week 1: refined oil products, other than diesel
week 2: coal
week 3: diesel
week 4: seaborne crude oil
week 5: pipeline oil
week 6: escrow gas payments
5/7
This kind of policy comes with some highly desirable effects.
First, it increases pressure on Putin. Ratcheting stops when he stops bombing children and withdraws.
Second, it puts pressure on consumers of Russian energy to start adjusting now.
6/7
Third, it can be designed to minimize the logistical disruption in Europe.
Fourth, it introduces much needed clarity.
Finally, with indefinite duration, it is a strong and credible policy.
Absent a full ban, this is a good option. Stop funding his war. Act now.
7/7
2/20 Just let that sink in: *2 weeks* into this war, German policymakers had on their desks a concise, lucid and detailed study of the economic effects of a policy tool (energy ban) that could actually make a difference in this war.
3/20 A tool that would not only reverse the mistaken policies that brought us to this point but would actually use the leverage we have (yes, EU’s addiction to Russian energy is a double-edged sword – a sword one can use to hit Putin hard).
MYTH 2: Russia can sell oil & gas to China and others, so we’d only be hurting ourselves.
FALSE: a complete substitution towards China is infeasible given the scale of EU imports. If China becomes nearly the sole buyer, it will bargain hard.
Another input into the energy imports embargo 🇩🇪 debate, now from @MonikaSchnitzer.
Unfortunately rather than the advertised "balanced and unexcited assessment of the tradeoffs" we get a bunch of gut feelings, unsubstantiated claims, and outright errors and misunderstandings.
What are the distributional consequences of shifts in technology? Who wins and who loses, and why?
Much has been said about the uneven impact of technology on wages of different workers (@davidautor, @lkatz42).
But what about its effects on wealth ownership and the unequal distribution of capital income?
In this paper we build a tractable framework of wealth and total (i.e. labor + capital) income distributions, and we use it to study the consequences of automation technologies.