1 #ufo Speaking about the 144 incidents in the ODNI report, Greenewald said, "they could not put 143 of them in any category that they came up with" and, "the other explanations, they said, were, potentially, classified systems from our own military, or,
2 JG: "a foreign advisory. But they were unable to identify any of the cases they investigated into those categories. What's interesting, with the resources of the U.S. military, they couldn't put them in those categories. So, it's a short list of what's left."
4 Would've been nice if @robbysoave & @ryangrim had known of JG's previous statements on Showtime:
"There's a big possibility, with incidents like the Nimitz (Tic Tac), the Rooosvelt encounters (Gimbal & Go Fast) & quite a few others through the years, there's a big possibility
"There's a big possibility, with incidents like the Nimitz (Tic Tac), the Rooosvelt encounters (Gimbal & Go Fast) & quite a few others through the years, there's a big possibility
5 JG: "THAT is done by the US military itself. Now we know that the @USNavy says, 'Well, we have no idea what these things are.' But that doesn't mean that that the @usairforce, who has been mysteriously quiet about the whole UAP/UFO issue, doesn't know what they are."
6 I think it's safe to assume the ODNI report, which looks back to 2004, includes Tic Tac encounter, & maybe Gimbal/Go fast, in the 143 unexplained incidents. In this recent interview, JG touted the military & their resources in being able to rule out that those were our
7 secret tech or foreign adversarial. Does JG still feel it's a "big possibility" those 3 incidents, or any one of them, are our black tech & USAF might know about it?
IMO, a perfect example of horrible analysis by JG.
Watch entire vids so u c I didn't take him out of context
IMO, a perfect example of horrible analysis by JG.
Watch entire vids so u c I didn't take him out of context
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
