Timothée Parrique Profile picture
Mar 26 • 14 tweets • 4 min read
Good news: Max Koch (@ProfMaxKoch1) has joined Twitter. Here are 13 degrowth-related papers from him you might want to read.

🧵
On social policy without growth.

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
On degrowth and wellbeing.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On income and wealth caps.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On transitions issues.

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
On growth and quality of life.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On the role of the State.

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
On the role of the State, again.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On global steady-state economy.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On the centrality of human needs for degrowth.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
On deliberative citizens forums on need satisfaction.

paecon.net/PAEReview/issu…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothée Parrique

Timothée Parrique Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @timparrique

Mar 15
First report assessing the recently introduced French “Repairability index.”

🧵
A “tsunami of e-waste”: in 2019 the global amount reached a staggering 53.6 million metric tons - an increase of 58% in less than 10 years, making it the world’s fastest growing waste stream.
Transferring these numbers to the global population would assign 7.3 kilograms to each individual. Yet, in France it reaches 21 kg per capita, indicating that more developed countries are responsible for the lion share of the total amount.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 1
The idea of #degrowth made it to the latest IPCC report.

🧵
The term “degrowth” is mentioned 27 times in the 3,675 pages of the full report (12 of these mentions occur in the bibliography). There is no mention of it neither in the 96 pages technical summary nor in the 36 pages summary for policy makers.
The first mention of the term happens in “Chapter 1: Point of Departure and Key Concepts,” in the penultimate section titled “Facilitating Long-Term Transformation," where degrowth is contrasted with ecomodernism on the issue of decoupling.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 18
18 tips to make your company look green (even though it’s not).

🧵
This is based on the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2022, which has assessed the climate strategies of 25 major global companies.

newclimate.org/2022/02/07/cor…
The study has identified 18 "bad practices" through which companies make themselves look greener than they actually are. Here are all of them.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 16
Another spectacular empirical study on unequal exchange by @jasonhickel, @C_Dorninger, Hanspeter Wieland, and Intan Suwandi.

🧵
The article is looking for evidence of something called "unequal exchange." (For more: compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…)
Finding: there is a net flow of resources from the global South to the global North. For example, for every unit of labour that the South imports from the North, they have to export on average 13 units to pay for it.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 7
Here is an indispensable piece of work to understand the global dynamics of environmental pressures. Thomas Wiedmann & Manfred Lenzen in @NatureGeosci.

🧵
In a globalised economy, many processes of production scatter through complex, international supply chains. To calculate the footprint of one single country, one must keep track of all the impacts its consumption has abroad.
This article is a review of the empirical literature that has looked at the environmental and social impacts embodied in international trade.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 3
An interesting article by @JPTilsted et al. on the "green" growth of Nordic countries (that is actually not as green as you may have heard).

🧵 Image
The article criticises the concept of "Genuine Green Growth" from @estoknes and @jrockstrom arguing that the growth of Nordic countries is not as genuine and green as it seems. Image
In the Stoknes & Rockström paper, the authors show that the emission patterns of Nordic countries sometime meets the green growth requirement of a yearly 5% improvement in carbon productivity (the straight blue line). Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(