Adv. Puneet Kumar Gupta appears for the parties contesting the Gyanvapi mosque being situated on the land in dispute. #kashi#mosque#temple#Varanasi
Gupta reads out the relief sought in the suit by Ancient Idol of Swayambhu Lord Vishweshwar filed in 1991 for restoration of performance of rituals at the principal seat of Asthan of Lord Visheshwar and other gods within the precincts of temple complex known as 'Ancient Temple'.
Gupta: Relief no. (1) A decree to reconstruct and renovate the old temple and the defendant(the Gyanvapi mosque) be directed to not obstructed the same in any manner. #kashi#mosque#temple#Varanasi
Gupta: Relief no. (2) A decree to give effect to the eviction of the defendants and to restrain them from interfering in possession of the plaintiff over the property. #kashi#mosque#temple#Varanasi
Gupta: These were the two reliefs that were sought in the 1991 suit. Though 'Asthan Lord Adi Visheshwar, Jyotirlinga' was damaged in 1669 under the orders of Mughal Ruler Aurangzeb but other subsidiary deities continued to exist within the ancient temple. #kashi#temple#mosque
Gupta: Now this ancient temple is claimed by Muslims to be part of the “Gyanvapi Mosque”. #kashi#temple#mosque#Varanasi
Gupta: The Central Govt. brought an act named Places of worship Act with effect from 18th September 1991.
Gupta reads from the Act: 'An Act to prohibit conversion of any place of worship and to provide for the maintenance of the religious character of any place of worship as it existed on the 15th day of August, 1947, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto."
Gupta: While bringing this law, the legislature was very clear that whatever be the nature of a religious place on August 15, 1947, that will be maintained as it was thereafter and its conversion was also prohibited. #kashi#varanasi#Temples
Court: Okay, the conversion was prohibited.
Gupta: Yes, if a place was a masjid, it was to remain the same and if it was a temple it was supposed to remain the same as well. #kashi#varanasi#Temples
Gupta: The suit for restoration of the land to Hindus was filed after the commencement of the Act in October 1991. #kashi#varanasi#Temples
He argues that the Act provides that the nature of the religious place as it was on August 15, 1947, was to be maintained, however, the ancient temple was demolished in the year 1869, and thereafter it was used as a mosque.
Court enquires what exactly the term 'conversion' means in Section 4(3) of the Act and asks the counsel to clarify the same on the next hearing. #kashi#temple#mosque
Court: If you are seeking the benefit of Section 4(3) of the Act, then you must prepare a stronger case on this point. #kashi#temple#mosque
Advocate Rastogi now begins his arguments. He says that the whole emphasis is being put upon the term '#conversion' here whereas, since ancient times, the land in question was a temple and still remains the same. #kashi#temple#mosque
He places documents in support of this contention. He also alleges that the temple had to be reconstructed a few times although the 18th-century temple was preserved despite the fact that there was a Muslim dynasty at that time. #kashi#temple#mosque
He also cites recorded incidents where a Mughal officer visited the place and met one Narayan Bhatt who had played his role in building the first floor of the new temple. #kashi#temple#mosque
He apprises court that thereafter the first floor of the temple was demolished. He also refers to one Gyan koop.
Photographs and text from ancient books have also been placed before the bench in support of the existence of the temple on the disputed land. #kashi#temple#mosque
He also alleges in an underground place above which now the Gynavpi mosque stands, aartis, and other rituals used to be performed. #kashi#temple#mosque
Hearing over. Arguments to continue in the instant plea and other connected matters on April 4. #kashi#temple#mosque#conversion
IMPORTANT: When the other party sought time till May, Advocate Rastogi expressed his wish that the hearing in the case(s) should get concluded before Navratri. #kashi#temple#mosque#conversion
It was argued that the religious nature of the land in question was never changed as the temple of Lord Visheshwar has been in existence from ancient times, i.e., Satyug up till now. @ISalilTiwari reports lawbeat.in/top-stories/ka…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt a special bench will shortly hear the plea for cancellation of bail of Ashish Mishra, the main accused in the #lakhimpurkheri violence that happened in October 2021. The court had on the last date of hearing asked #UP to file a reply to the plea.
Uttar Pradesh in its counter has said that the kin of the victims of #lakhimpurkheri violence and the eye witnesses have been provided security. UP has also said that it vehemently opposed Mishra’s bail in High Court
🚨Shortly in Delhi HC - plea challenging “arbitrary suspension” of Twitter handle of social media group @wokeflix_ . Wokeflix says social media platforms like Twitter should be held accountable for arbitrary actions. Plea by handle of Dimple Kaul @BharadwajSpeaks also listed
@wokeflix_@BharadwajSpeaks Single Judge bench of Justice Yashwant Varma is expected to hear the case today.
@wokeflix_@BharadwajSpeaks Earlier this month, the High Court had issued notice on a petition by "Wokeflix", an unregistered social media group engaged in posting political satires, against the permanent suspension of its Twitter handle and temporary suspension of Instagram handle. lawbeat.in/top-stories/br…
🚨In Srinagar Court today - Family of Kashmiri Hindu Satish Tikoo who was killed by terrorist Bitta Karate approaches Court for retrial in case. #KashmiriPandits
Retrial plea against terrorist Bitta Karate adjourned. Court asks Satish Tickoo’s family lawyer to file hard copy by April 16. Bitta Karate’s lawyer asked to file a hard copy motion in the case to be a party in the case. Next hearing of case on April 16
via @AdityaRajKaul’s TL
In #SupremeCourt hearing plea by Ashwini Upadhyay challenging Section 2(f) of the National Commission for Minority Education Institution Act 2004, since it confers unbridled powers on Centre to declare community as 'minority'
SG: We have filed a reply, I could not read it.
Kaul J: The reply by centre has appeared on media already.
SG: Some PILs are like that, before a document reaches the law officer, it reaches the media
Anupam Lal Das, Sr.Adv: This pertains to linguistic, religious and political minority.
SG: What is political minority!
Das: I apologise only linguistic and religious minorities.
SG: I thought a new term has been coined #SupremeCourt
🚨Calcutta High Court’s Suo Motu case hearing concerning #BirbhumMassacre expected at 2 PM.
Yesterday Court directed State of West Bengal to submit a status report on probe into incident in which homes were set ablaze & 10 persons including women & children were charred to death
Petitioner says that inspite of directions by court yesterday, CCTV cameras not installed
"Police and CM @MamataOfficial has been visiting the place of incident today - they have announced "packages", this is a way to influence witnesses" #BirbhumMassacre
Petitioner: The incident can be compared with 2002 in Gujarat.
Another Petitioner now highlights the various incidents of violence in Bengal. #BirbhumMassacre
#SupremeCourt hearing plea by Mumbai's former top cop Param Bir Singh seeking transfer of cases of alleged misconduct and corruption to Central Bureau of Investigation.
Senior Advocate Puneet Bali appearing for Singh submitted that I have prepared a note, want to show the shocking aspect.
Bench: Whole case is shocking.
Bali: My officers were asked to collect Rs. 100 Crores from the bars.
Bali: Maharashtra Government moved against the High Court order, also an FIR was registered on a complaint of a Bookie.