'Seeking to predict people’s future behaviour and punish them for it is completely incompatible with the fundamental right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.'
[6] Much hinges on how this prohibition is drafted.
Predictive policing is the attempt to use AI to predict where and why whom crimes are likely to be committed in the future.
[7] Or the profiling of certain areas as places where 'low impact' crimes, like burglaries and muggings, are likely to happen. @ENAREurope released a report on the racialised nature of place-based predictive policing, written by @PatrickWillia17 + @ @e3i5
"The increased use of such systems is part of a growing ideology that social issues can be solved by allocating more power, resources - and now technologies - to police."
1/4 🚨Times of crisis must NOT be an excuse for undermining human rights!
In the closed-door #DigitalServicesAct negotiations, the @EU_Commission proposed a “crisis response mechanism” that would give itself the powers to unilaterally declare an EU-wide state of emergency.
2/4 In that state of emergency, the Commission would be able to force online platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to interfere with the right to free expression and the dissemination of information online. Hardly any checks and balances, no time limits.
3/4 At a minimum, the mechanism must:
🗣️require ex-post consent by @Europarl_EN
⏳include time limits for emergency powers
✋limit its use to serious threats to the EU only, not localised emergencies
⚖️ensure transparency of process when deciding any crisis mitigation measures
1/4 📢 Today, @EDRi, @fairtrials & 40+ civil society organisations urge the EU to ❌ BAN AI predictive & profiling systems in law enforcement & criminal justice in the #AIAct.
2/4 AI systems are used to profile people & areas, predict crime & assess the likely ‘risk’ of criminality.
This leads to undemocratic practices like surveillance, stop & search, fines, questioning, arrest, detention, prosecution & civil punishments like denial of welfare.
3/4 🚨AI can exacerbate structural imbalances of power & often harm the most marginalised in society.
The data law enforcement & criminal justice use to build & run AI systems result in the over-policing, disproportional surveillance & imprisoning of racialised groups in Europe.
Many Muslims are subject to discrimination, oppression & abuse because of anti-terrorist & surveillance policies in Europe, disproportionately targeting them as a threat to security.
2/5 ❌ The EU's 2020 Counter-Terrorism Agenda uses a flawed narrative that more surveillance is needed to guarantee security. This will only increase the over-policing of Muslims through data-sharing & biometric mass surveillance.
1/8 🙅♀️ Debiasing AI is not a silver bullet! 🙅🏾♂️
EDRi's latest report by @AggieBalayn & @sedyst from @tudelft shows that EU policymakers must STOP framing AI harms as technical flaws in the design of the AI systems, which can be fixed by using tech or "debiasing" solutions.
2/8 The report explains why AI inequalities are a much more complicated problem than just a system design issue.
🔥To make a real difference to the experience of marginalised groups, lawmakers need to view AI in the wider context of structural discrimination, inequality & power.
3/8 ❌ Failing to recognise the complexity of #AI’s impact on the broader political economy, risks giving even more power & control to #BigTech.
📢Today @sarahchander and @ellajakubowska1 takeover the @edri twitter account to give you their first impressions of the #EUAI Regulation as soon as it is out! Stay tuned for the latest impressions from civil society.
We're here! We'll be watching the press conference here and sharing our thoughts:
📢 It’s time to debunk narratives that the #TERREG will effectively fight terrorist content. In reality, it wouldn’t protect anyone from terrorism & it would censor marginalised groups.
Its proponents are making these false claims to support its adoption in the @Europarl_EN ⬇️
"Member States are free to determine their competent authority, as long as it acts independently and in a non-discriminatory manner."
❌Lack of mandatory judicial authorization & review of orders by national authorities to remove content online means erosion of the rule of law👇
❌To censor content within 1 hour, without prior judicial authorisation will lead to excessive, arbitrary or discriminatory interference with fundamental rights.
❌Systemic violations of the rule of law and fundamental rights concerns the EU as well: europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-…