Michael Bond Profile picture
Apr 17 31 tweets 12 min read
Thread 🧵consolidating updates from April 11 – April 17 on the large scale unit repositioning and resupply efforts ongoing in Ukraine. This thread will be incorporated into my primary thread on combat losses, which will be linked at the bottom once complete
It may be helpful for context to read the consolidation I put together last week
Combat Strength
On April 8 US estimated that Russia retains 80-85% combat strength


On April 12 this was updated to be just over 80%
Of an estimated 120 Battalion Tactical Groups (BTGs) committed by Russia to the invasion, it is believed there are currently between 65 and 75 BTGs in Ukraine as Russian moves and reconstitutes its forces
The estimated number of BTGs rendered combat ineffective has been evaluated at 37-38.
It is expected that the Russian concentration in the Donbas will increase significantly with the addition of dozens of new BTGs and tens of thousands of soldiers
Russian Equipment Manufacturing
There have been several reports over the past few weeks of production delays at Russian tank assembly plants and now there are unconfirmed reports of new stoppages
Australia recently added the primary Russian truck manufacturer Kamaz to their sanctions list


There are calls for similar sanctions in other countries, which have been targeting other military manufacturing companies instead
One item of interest to me was that Russian missile production is reliant on just two suppliers and I hope to dig into their material this week to see if we can learn anything about production capacity

ktrv.ru

almaz-antey.ru/en/
Repositioning
US defence officials have said that they expect Russia wants to move quickly


However, western officials believe there are still significant bottlenecks limiting the speed with which Russia is repositioning its forces
The speed of Russian repositioning of forces has been somewhat hampered by problems with rail transport, including reports of apparent sabotage
However, the increased supply of equipment to Ukraine has also begun to put stress on the rail network in Eastern Europe
Captured Equipment
It was recently noted by the leading OSINT observer that equipment captured by Ukraine from Russia has now exceeded 1000 units
While there is not enough certainty around captured equipment to incorporate it into the force estimates at this time, there are increasing signs that captured equipment will be useful
Training on captured equipment
Repair
The ability to repair damaged heavy equipment has been reduced on the Ukrainian side by heavy damage to the tank factory in Kharkiv and missile attacks on the factory in Lviv


However, the Ukrainians have found new techniques to repair heavy equipment


This process appears to be increasingly systematized
Here is a discussion about Ukrainian thoughts on repairing damaged and captured equipment

and a video report
Unfortunately, Russia has begun to target these facilities. There was a recent strike on a facility in Kyiv that was until recently a tank storage facility



urbextour.com/en/kyiv-urbex/…
New Equipment for Ukraine
For an effort to keep an ongoing count of equipment supplied to Ukraine see
oryxspioenkop.com/2022/04/answer…
The rate of supply of weapons to Ukraine remains high, with the arrival of 8-10 flights worth of equipment per day

The US is confident it can get sufficient supplies to Ukraine before the resumption of a concerted Russian offensive
A pentagon official has stated that it takes 4 days to ship weapons to near Ukraine’s borders and 1-2 days to distribute in the country
In addition to the announcements of armoured vehicles destined for Ukraine from the UK, the Czech Republic and Australia we have many new announcements.
The first of the Australian Bushmaster vehicles have begun to arrive and video has circulated of what is believed to be some Czech and Slovakian equipment on the move towards Ukraine



US supplies alone have been substantial, with the heaviest of the newly announced supplies being Humvees, M113 APCs and Mi-17 helicopters
There was speculation that Ukraine could purchase vehicles, possibly Leopard tanks, from German manufacturer Rheinmetall
rnd.de/politik/rheinm…

Germany has announced funding for Ukrainian purchases of military equipment worth between $1B and $2B USD
ndtv.com/world-news/ger…
Canada has promised to provide light armoured vehicles as well


We have received the first details of French commitments to Ukraine
On the note of domestically produced Ukrainian weaponry, we have background information on previous statements about production capacity for Neptune antiship missiles and some estimates of current inventory
Training of Ukrainian personnel
In addition to previously discussed training of Ukrainian military personnel in the US on the Switchblade systems and a Lithuanian training program, several other announcements have been made about training
It is reported that small units of the Ukrainian military will soon begin to be trained in Poland by the US military
The UK has announced it will train Ukrainians on the vehicles it plans to provide

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Bond

Michael Bond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HelloMrBond

Apr 17
April 17 Full update to thread 🧵 on estimates of #Russia and #Ukraine losses compared to available forces, using RU and UKR claims along with the best available #OSINT observations and estimates
Summary
OSINT % losses of Russian Committed (Russian total) vs Ukrainian total
Personnel 32.1(6.8) vs 10.4
Armor 41(8.6) vs 11.4
Tanks 42.2(15.3) vs 14.5
Artillery 13.8(3.9) vs 3.5
Aircraft 6.4(1.5) vs 13.6
Helicopters 14.2(3.5) vs 8.7
Read 59 tweets
Apr 15
Were there #nuclear weapons on the #Moskva? Unravelling a game of telephone.

It starts with this tweet from an account that bills itself as belonging to a “Data & Covid expert”. It cites BlackSeaNews as saying “Moskva was equipped with 2 nuclear warheads”.
The BlackSeaNews is an often cited source on events in the Black Sea

blackseanews.net

The linked Facebook account has no recent posts that mention nuclear warheads on the Moskva
However, the account of Andrii Klymenko, the co-founder of the BlackSeaNews, had a post saying “there are 2 nuclear warheads… on board of the Russian Federation Moscow”. The seriousness of this is clear by the statement that it is a matter for the UN and IAEA (MAGATE in Russian)
Read 10 tweets
Apr 14
UK-Dutch natural gas pipeline as background for the discussion in the space

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBL_Pipel…
The main shareholder of the company is Gasunie with 60%, and Uniper and Fluxys both own 20%. Gazprom had an option for 9%, in exchange for a 9% share of Nord Stream AG. The BBL Pipeline would allow Gazprom to supply gas to the British market via the Nord Stream pipeline
“The pipeline has a regulatory exemption from the two-ways gas flow until October 2018. Until this, the direction of gas flow is from the Netherlands to the UK”
Read 5 tweets
Apr 11
Ukraine: Personnel 6/
RU claim
30,500* (14,000; 16,000; 500 POW)(KIA; wounded; POW)
30,500/196,600 = 15.5%  
*not updated since Mar 25
 
My evaluation is 4,500 Ukrainian KIA and 3x that wounded
OS 18,500 (4,500; x3=13,500; 500(per RU)) (KIA; wounded; POW)
18,500/196,600 = 9.4%
Ukraine: Aircraft 
RU claim 127/125 = 100+%
OS Photo 15/125 = 12%  
OS Expert* 70/125 = 56%
*‘roughly 55 fighter jets’, quoting Dave Deptula, of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies  nytimes.com/2022/03/22/wor…
IISS states 125 combat capable jets, implying a loss of 70 jets
Helicopters
Note that the OS percentage loss of Russian helicopters has actually declined since last week. This appears to be due to a reclassification of certain losses by the OSINT analysis source that I rely on
Read 10 tweets
Apr 11
April 10 Full update to thread 🧵 on estimates of #Russia and #Ukraine losses compared to available forces, using RU and UKR claims along with the best available #OSINT observations and estimates
Concept
When competing claims are made for losses, setting these claims against each other can narrow the range that actual numbers should lie within. Claims form a maximum and admissions form a minimum. NATO has stated that it uses a similar approach in forming its estimates
Read 47 tweets
Apr 11
Thread 🧵consolidating updates from April 3 – April 10 on the large scale unit repositioning and resupply efforts ongoing in Ukraine. This thread will be incorporated into my primary thread on combat losses, which will be linked at the bottom once complete
Combat Strength
On March 25 US estimated Russia retained 85-90% combat strength


On April 8 this was updated to an estimate that Russia retains 80-85% combat strength
Of an estimated 120 Battalion Tactical Groups (BTGs) committed by Russia to the invasion, it is believed they have withdrawn 40 BTGs

Another estimate suggests that 80 of 130 BTGs remain within Ukraine
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(